Search

Background:We completed a phase I clinical trial to test the safety and toxicity of combined treatment with cixutumumab (anti-IGF-1R antibody) and selumetinib (MEK 1/2 inhibitor).Methods:Patients with advanced solid tumours, refractory to standard therapy received selumetinib hydrogen sulphate capsules orally twice daily, and cixutumumab intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The study used a 3+3 design, with a dose-finding cohort followed by an expansion cohort at the maximally tolerated dose that included pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlative studies.Results:Thirty patients were enrolled, with 16 in the dose-finding cohort and 14 in the expansion cohort. Grade 3 or greater toxicities included nausea and vomiting, anaemia, CVA, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, and ophthalmic symptoms. The maximally tolerated combination dose was 50 mg twice daily of selumetinib and 12 mg kg−1 every 2 weeks of cixutumumab. Two patients achieved a partial response (one unconfirmed), including a patient with BRAF wild-type thyroid carcinoma, and a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, and six patients achieved time to progression of >6 months, including patients with thyroid carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma. Comparison of pre- and on-treatment biopsies showed significant suppression of pERK and pS6 activity with treatment.Conclusions:Our study of anti-IGF-1R antibody cixutumumab and MEK 1/2 inhibitor selumetinib showed that the combination is safe and well-tolerated at these doses, with preliminary evidence of clinical benefit and pharmacodynamic evidence of target inhibition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Preclinical drug screens identified disulfiram as a potent in vitro inhibitor of prostate cancer (PCa) cell growth. Although many mechanisms for its anticancer activity have been proposed, tumor suppressor gene re-expression through promoter demethylation emerged as one of the more plausible.Methods:We conducted an open-label, dose escalation trial of disulfiram in men with non-metastatic recurrent PCa after local therapy. Dose escalation occurred if a demethylating 'response' (that is, 10% decrease in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) global 5-methyl cytosine (5meC) content) was observed in <3 patients in cohort 1. Cohorts 1 and 2 received disulfiram 250 mg and 500 mg daily, respectively. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects with a demethylation response. Secondary end points included the rate of PSA progression at 6 months, changes in PSA doubling time and safety/tolerability.Results:Changes in global 5meC content were observed in two of nine patients (22.2%) in cohort 1 and 3 of 10 (30.0%) in cohort 2. Only five subjects were on trial for 6 months, all were in cohort 1 and all had PSA progression by 6 months. No changes in PSA kinetics were observed in either cohort. Disulfiram was poorly tolerated with six patients experiencing grade 3 adverse events (three per cohort). Three of the responders displayed pretreatment instability in their 5meC content.Conclusions:A minority of patients had transient global PBMC demethylation changes. Instability in 5meC may limit the reproducibility of these findings, limiting our ability to confirm our hypothesis. Given the toxicities and no clinical benefits, further development of disulfiram should not be pursued in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Preclinical studies suggest that histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors may restore tumour sensitivity to retinoids. The objective of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability, and the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of the HDAC inhibitor entinostat in combination with 13-cis retinoic acid (CRA) in patients with solid tumours.Methods:Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated with entinostat orally once weekly and with CRA orally twice daily × 3 weeks every 4 weeks. The starting dose for entinostat was 4 mg m−2 with a fixed dose of CRA at 1 mg kg−1 per day. Entinostat dose was escalated by 1 mg m−2 increments. Pharmacokinetic concentrations of entinostat and CRA were determined by LC/MS/MS. Western blot analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumour samples were performed to evaluate target inhibition.Results:A total of 19 patients were enroled. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was exceeded at the entinostat 5 mg m−2 dose level (G3 hyponatremia, neutropenia, and anaemia). Fatigue (G1 or G2) was a common side effect. Entinostat exhibited substantial variability in clearance (147%) and exposure. CRA trough concentrations were consistent with prior reports. No objective responses were observed, however, prolonged stable disease occurred in patients with prostate, pancreatic, and kidney cancer. Data further showed increased tumour histone acetylation and decreased phosphorylated ERK protein expression.Conclusion:The combination of entinostat with CRA was reasonably well tolerated. The recommended phase II doses are entinostat 4 mg m−2 once weekly and CRA 1 mg kg−1 per day. Although no tumour responses were seen, further evaluation of this combination is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this work was to determine the efficacy of inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in pancreatic cancer preclinical models and translate preclinical observations to the clinic.Methods: Temsirolimus (20 mg Kg(-1) daily) was administered to freshly generated pancreatic cancer xenografts. Tumour growth inhibition was determined after 28 days. Xenografts were characterised at baseline by gene expression and comparative genomic hybridisation. Patients with advanced, gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer were treated with sirolimus (5 mg daily). The primary end point was 6-month survival rate (6mSR). Correlative studies included immunohistochemistry assessment of pathway expression in baseline tumours, drug pharmacokinetics (PKs), response assessment by FDG-PET and pharmacodynamic effects in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).Results: In all, 4 of 17 xenografts (23%) responded to treatment. Sensitive tumours were characterised by gene copy number variations and overexpression of genes leading to activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Activation of p70S6K correlated with drug activity in the preclinical studies. Sirolimus was well tolerated in the clinic, showed predictable PKs, exerted pathway inhibition in post-treatment PBMCs and resulted in a 6mSR of 26%. No correlation, however, was found between activated p70S6K in tumour tissues and anti-tumour effects.Conclusion: Sirolimus activity in pancreatic cancer was marginal and not predicted by the selected biomarker. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the results of a phase I dose escalation trial of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in relapsed and refractory acute leukemia patients using an intermittent dosing regimen. Fifteen patients with advanced leukemia (12 with acute myeloid leukemia, 2 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 1 with biphenotypic) and a median age of 63 (range 37-85) years were enrolled and treated on a dose escalation trial. Toxicities >or=grade 3 were present in 55% of cycles and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 400 mg b.i.d. x 21 days in a 28-day cycle. Plasma inhibitory assays of kinase targets extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) showed excellent target inhibition, with FLT3-ITD silencing occurring below the MTD. The N-oxide metabolite of sorafenib seemed to be a more potent inhibitor of FLT3-ITD than the parent compound. Despite marked ex vivo FLT-3 ITD inhibition, no patients met the criteria for complete or partial response in this monotherapy study. Out of 15 patients, 11 experienced stable disease as best response. Although sorafenib showed only modest clinical activity as a single agent in this heavily treated population, robust inhibition of FLT3 and ERK suggests that there may be a potential important role in combination therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pupose of this study was to evaluate the activity of ON 01910.Na, a mitotic inhibitor, in in vitro and in vivo models of pancreatic cancer and to discover biomarkers predictive of efficacy. Successive in vitro and in vivo models were used; these included cell line-derived and patient-derived tumors from our PancXenoBank, a live collection of freshly generated pancreatic cancer xenografts. ON 01910.Na showed equivalent activity to gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro. The activity of the agent correlated with suppression of phospho-CDC25C and cyclin B1. These markers were optimized for a fine-needle aspirate ex vivo rapid assay. Cyclin B1 mRNA evaluation yielded the most optimal combination of accuracy and reproducibility. Next, nine patient-derived tumors from the PancXenoBank were profiled using the assay developed in cell lines and treated with ON01910.Na for 28 days. Two cases were cataloged as potential responders and seven as resistants. There was a correlation between the ex vivo assay and sensitivity to the tested agent, as the two cases prospectively identified as sensitive met prespecified criteria for response. Of the seven tumors of predictive resistant, only one was found to be sensitive to ON 01910.Na. In addition, there was a good correlation between cyclin B1 downregulation ex vivo and changes in cyclin B1 protein post-treatment. The novel mitotic inhibitor, ON 01910.Na, showed activity in preclinical model of pancreatic cancer. A rapid assay was rationally developed that not only identified cases sensitive to ON 01910.Na, but also anticipated the pharmacodynamic events occurring after in vivo exposure.Oncogene (2009) 28, 610–618; doi:10.1038/onc.2008.424; published online 24 November 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]