Search

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of ripasudil for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Study design: Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 12-week clinical trial. Methods: Infants born with gestational age (GA) of ≤ 32 weeks or weight of ≤ 1500 g with zone I or II, ≥ stage 1, ROP in both eyes were enrolled. Ripasudil eye drops were administered to patients in both eyes. Phase 1 was a dose-escalation study (once daily for 1 week, then twice daily for 2 weeks); an additional dosing up to 9 weeks was allowed if no safety issues occurred. In phase 2, ripasudil was administered twice daily for up to 12 weeks. Adverse events were assessed. The proportion of patients with type 1 ROP progression, number of days for type 1 ROP progression, and progression to the most advanced ROP stage were estimated. Results: Twenty-four infants were enrolled (phase 1, n = 3; phase 2, n = 21). Nineteen and four patients experienced systemic and ocular adverse events, respectively. Efficacy endpoints were not different between the ripasudil and historical control groups. However, in the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroup, fewer patients progressed to type 1 ROP in the ripasudil than in the historical control group (P = 0.09). In the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroups, the 25th percentile for the number of days for type 1 ROP progression was 22 days in the historical control group and 44 days in the ripasudil group. Conclusion: Ripasudil was safe and inhibited/delayed type 1 ROP progression, especially in infants with short GA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cataract surgery poses a risk to corneal endothelial cells. This study aimed to assess the protective effect of rho-associated kinase inhibitor eye drop (ripasudil) on corneal endothelial cells after cataract surgery over 12 months. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded comparative study including 43 patients divided into two groups: the ripasudil group (22 patients, 23 eyes) and the control group (21 patients, 21 eyes). All patients had grade 3 nuclear cataract and underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. In the ripasudil group, one drop of ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate (Glanatec® ophthalmic solution 0.4%) was administered three times a day for 5 days. Outcome measures included central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell density (ECD), which were evaluated preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Results: In the ripasudil group, the median ECD was 2398 (interquartile range [IQR] 410, 2201–2611) cells/mm2 at baseline and 2262 (IQR 298, 2195–2493) cells/mm2 at 12 months postoperatively. In the control group, the median ECD was 2503 (IQR 390, 2340–2730) cells/mm2 at baseline and 2170 (IQR 324, 2049–2373) cells/mm2 at 12 months postoperatively. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) was 12.8% in the control group, significantly reduced to 4.5% in the ripasudil group (p = 0.001*). CCT (p = 0.042), age (p = 0.383), sex (p = 0.944), and duration of surgery (p = 0.319) were not significant factors. No adverse effects were observed in either of the groups. Conclusions: Incorporating ripasudil into postoperative management could help maintain corneal endothelial cell integrity and reduce cell loss after cataract surgery, potentially decreasing the need for endothelial transplantation in patients who have undergone intraocular surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A clinical trial evaluated ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of netarsudil 0.02% once daily (QD) relative to ripasudil 0.4% twice daily (BID). Methods: This was a single-masked, randomized, phase 3, superiority study. Japanese patients were randomized to either the netarsudil 0.02% group or the ripasudil 0.4% group in a 1:1 ratio and treated for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) (average of diurnal time points at 09:00, 11:00, and 16:00) at Week 4. Results: A total of 245 patients were included in the primary analysis. At Week 4, least squares (LS) mean of diurnal IOP adjusted for baseline was 15.96 and 17.71 mmHg in the netarsudil 0.02% and ripasudil 0.4% groups, respectively, demonstrating the superiority of netarsudil 0.02% QD over ripasudil 0.4% BID by a margin of − 1.74 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Mean reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP at Week 4 was 4.65 and 2.98 mmHg, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) occurred less frequently in netarsudil 0.02% than in ripasudil 0.4%, with the incidence of ocular AEs being 59.8% and 66.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported AE was conjunctival hyperemia in both groups, with an incidence of 54.9% and 62.6%, respectively. No serious eye-related AEs were reported. Conclusion: Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% dosed QD (p.m.) was well tolerated and more effective in reducing IOP than ripasudil ophthalmic solution 0.4% dosed BID. Netarsudil 0.02% QD may become an important option for the treatment of Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04620135. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness and ripasudil was the first Rho kinase inhibitor approved as antiglaucoma medication. Here we present the final analysis of the ROCK-J study, a large-scale post-marketing surveillance study to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of ripasudil in Japanese patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension in a real-word clinical setting. Methods: ROCK-J was a 24-month, prospective, open-label, observational study that included ripasudil-naïve patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were initiating treatment with ripasudil according to the Japanese approved indication between June 1, 2015 and April 30, 2017. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (including blepharitis, plus assessment of its background factors); the primary efficacy endpoint was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to 24 months. Results: A total of 3374 Japanese patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were evaluated for safety and 3178 for effectiveness of ripasudil over a mean 524.5-day observational period. Overall, 853 (25.3%) patients experienced adverse drug reactions; the most common were blepharitis (8.6%), conjunctival hyperemia (8.5%), and conjunctivitis (6.3%). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that patients were more likely to experience the ADR blepharitis with ripasudil treatment if they were female (hazard ratio [HR] 1.307; p = 0.040), had comorbid or a previous history of blepharitis (HR 2.178; p = 0.001), or had a history of allergy to pollen (HR 1.645; p = 0.003) or medication (HR 2.276; p < 0.001). IOP decreased significantly from baseline with ripasudil; the least-squares mean ± standard error change in IOP from baseline to 24 months was − 2.6 ± 0.1 mmHg (p < 0.001). Significant IOP changes were seen in four types of glaucoma, namely primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, primary angle-closure glaucoma, and secondary glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. Conclusion: Ripasudil was safe and effective as an antiglaucoma medication with no new safety signals identified and significant reductions in IOP maintained over 24 months of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing efficacy and safety of Rho-kinase inhibitor (RKI). Methods: Published studies in PubMed and EMBASE were searched on March 20, 2021. Study selection and data extraction were performed according to PRISMA. Meta-analysis of the IOP-lowering effect was performed with the bivariate random-effects model, with studies categorized into 2 classes: RKI versus placebo and RKI versus another medication. The main outcome was the difference in IOP reduction between RKI and non-RKI groups. Subgroup analysis of adjunctive RKI efficacy and additional review of its major ocular adverse events (AE) were also performed. Results: Ten (2.6%) out of 391 studies were retrieved. In the RKI versus placebo class, RKI showed greater IOP reduction after 4–8 weeks (mean difference = − 1.69 mmHg [− 2.22, − 1.16], P < 0.001). In the RKI versus another medication class, IOP reduction by RKI was noninferior to timolol 0.5% twice-daily after 4–8 weeks (mean difference = 0.39 mmHg [0.01, 0.76], P = 0.043) and 12 weeks (mean difference = 0.48 mmHg [0.11, 0.85]; P = 0.011). In the subgroup analysis, the mean difference in IOP reduction by adjunctive RKI and placebo was − 1.42 mmHg (P < 0.001). The most common ocular AE of RKI was conjunctival hyperemia (19–65%), followed by conjunctival hemorrhage (6–20%) and cornea verticillata (13–26%). Conclusions: With a treatment duration of 1–3 months, RKI showed effective IOP reduction noninferior to timolol as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy. Our results suggested RKI be a reliable IOP control medication; however, its higher incidence of some ocular complications should be attended to. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the additional effects and safety of a Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate, in Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with an intraocular pressure (IOP) of at most 15 mmHg undergoing prostaglandin F2α (FP) receptor agonist monotherapy (FP monotherapy). Methods: In this prospective observational study, 30 Japanese patients with POAG and IOP of at most 15 mmHg (mean age 59.4 years; 10 men) who were undergoing FP monotherapy in both eyes were administered an additional dose of ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate (GLANATEC ophthalmic solution 0.4%: ripasudil) in one eye. The following factors were investigated at 1 and 3 months after the initiation of ripasudil treatment: (1) magnitude of change in IOP between the treated and contralateral untreated eyes, (2) number of treated eyes showing 20% and 30% IOP reduction, (3) IOP difference between treated and contralateral untreated eyes, and (4) safety during the treatment period. Both (1) and (3) were analyzed using the mixed-effect model for repeated measurements. Results: The treated eyes showed significant reduction in IOP at 1 month (− 1.92 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 3 months (− 1.81 mmHg, P < 0.001). In contrast, contralateral untreated eyes did not show IOP reduction at 1 month (0.53 mmHg, P = 0.016) and 3 months (0.38 mmHg, P = 0.15). IOP reduction of − 20% and − 30% was achieved in 9 (30%) and 3 (10%) treated eyes, respectively. There were significant differences in IOP between the treated and contralateral untreated eyes at 1 month (− 2.46 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 3 months (− 2.20 mmHg, P < 0.001). Two patients experienced local adverse events (facial edema, one patient at week 1; blepharitis, one patient at 1 month); they recovered quickly after stopping ripasudil administration. Conclusion: In patients with POAG with an IOP of at most 15 mmHg undergoing FP monotherapy, the addition of ripasudil resulted in significant IOP lowering at 1 and 3 months. Ripasudil could be used to enhance the outcome of FP monotherapy. Trial registration: Registered UMIN ID: UMIN000030742. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: We performed an investigation of the temporal impact on corneal endothelial cell (CEC) shape after ophthalmic instillation of one drop of the ROCK inhibitor, ripasudil. Methods: Subjects comprised 32 healthy adult volunteers, each of whom instilled ripasudil in the right eye. CEC shape [defined as CEC density (CECD), coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonal cell rate (6A)], central corneal thickness (CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and conjunctival hyperemia were evaluated before instillation (baseline) and at 15 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4–6 h after instillation by non-contact specular microscopy and slit-lamp microscopy. The incidence of pseudo gutta was also assessed. Results: The CECD (cells/mm2) significantly decreased after instillation as follows: 2661 cells/mm2 at baseline, 2578 cells/mm2 at 15 min, 2527 cells/mm2 at 1 h, 2575 cells/mm2 at 2 h, and 2613 cells/mm2 at 4–6 h. After instillation, CV significantly increased and 6A significantly decreased. Pseudo gutta appeared in 18 subjects (56.3%) after instillation. There was no difference in CCT before and after instillation. IOP significantly decreased after instillation. The most severe conjunctival hyperemia was observed at 15 min after instillation, but had nearly disappeared within 2 h. Conclusions: Pseudo gutta appeared in more than half of the subjects, and the CEC shape changed upon instillation of one drop of ripasudil; however, it recovered at 4–6 h after instillation. Therefore, these changes would not greatly impact clinical treatment. Similar to the presence of conjunctival hyperemia, changes in CEC shape occur at early stages after instillation of ripasudil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of topically administrated ripasudil, a rho kinase inhibitor, on blood flow in the optic nerve head (ONH) of normal rats.Methods: Ripasudil (0.4%) or placebo was administered in the right eye of normal Brown Norway rats in a double-blind manner. Laser speckle flowgraphy was measured in the ONH of the right eye 20 or 40 min after a single instillation and before and after 7 or 14 days of twice daily instillation. Mean blur rate was evaluated in the total area (MA), the vessel region (MV), and the tissue region (MT). Intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, ocular perfusion pressure (OPP), and heart rate were also recorded at each time point.Results: After a single instillation, MV was significantly larger at 40 min than 20 min in the ripasudil group (P = 0.044) and was significantly lower in the placebo group (P = 0.023). MA and MV 40 min after instillation were significantly larger in the ripasudil group than in the placebo group (P = 0.022 and P = 0.006, respectively). After continuous instillation, MA and MV in the ripasudil group significantly increased from baseline after 7 and 14 days of treatment (both P < 0.05) and MA, MV, and MT were significantly higher than in the placebo group (MA: 7 and 14 days, P < 0.01; MV: 7 days, P = 0.003, and 14 days, P = 0.012; MT: 7 days, P = 0.046). There were no significant changes in IOP, blood pressure, or OPP after single or continuous instillation.Conclusions: Topical instillation of ripasudil increased blood flow around the ONH in the eyes of normal rats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects of a ripasudil 0.4% ophthalmic solution in Japanese patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OH) as a post-marketing surveillance.Methods: This was a 2-year prospective observational study in patients with glaucoma or OH who had not previously received ripasudil. Patients registered in the study using a central internet-based system from June 1, 2015 to April 30, 2017. Data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and IOP were collected and analysed from the first 3 months of ripasudil treatment.Results: Of the 3058 patients in the safety analysis set, 3016 had IOP data and were included in the efficacy analysis. ADRs were seen in 244 (8.0%) of the 3058 patients. IOP decreased significantly in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (- 2.9 ± 4.2 mmHg; p < 0.001), normal tension glaucoma (- 1.7 ± 2.4 mmHg; p < 0.001), primary angle-closure glaucoma (- 3.9 ± 5.3 mmHg; p < 0.001), and OH (- 3.8 ± 5.8 mmHg; p < 0.001). Significant IOP reduction was also noted in exfoliation glaucoma (- 3.0 ± 5.5 mmHg; p < 0.001), uveitis-associated glaucoma (- 4.7 ± 7.2 mmHg; p < 0.001) and steroid glaucoma (- 5.5 ± 6.0 mmHg; p < 0.001), but not for neovascular glaucoma (- 2.8 ± 12.1 mmHg; p = 0.669).Conclusion: Ripasudil was safe and effective in the treatment of glaucoma and OH in Japanese patients, with a low incidence of ADRs or treatment discontinuation, and reduced IOP after 3 months of treatment.Funding: Kowa Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of adjunctive therapy involving the Rho-associated, coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor ripasudil in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with different subtypes of glaucoma, on the basis of the time of IOP measurementStudy design: Retrospective studyMethods: In total, 58 patients who underwent adjunctive therapy with ripasudil at a single institution were included. They were classified into a primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) group, an exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) group, and a secondary glaucoma associated with uveitis, or steroid glaucoma (SG), group. The average IOPs within 6 months before (pre-IOP) and after (post-IOP) the addition of ripasudil were compared among the 3 groups. The IOP values of the morning-visit and afternoon-visit groups were also compared to reflect the peak effectiveness of ripasudil.Results: The IOP reductions in the POAG (n = 38), XFG (n = 6), and SG (n = 14) groups were −1.1, +0.5, and +0.5 mmHg, respectively. Significant reductions in IOP were observed in the POAG group (P = .014). The IOP reductions in the POAG morning-visit and afternoon-visit groups were −1.9 and +0.5 mmHg, respectively. IOP was significantly reduced in the morning-visit POAG group after treatment with ripasudil (P = .002). The IOP values measured during morning visits were lower than those measured during afternoon visits (IOP reduction: −1.3 mmHg; P = .011).Conclusions: The findings of the present study indicate that ripasudil is effective as an adjunctive therapy for lowering IOP in patients with POAG; these reductions are more significant when measured closer to the time of peak effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of either switching from topical prostaglandin (PG) analog monotherapy to topical PG/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding topical ripasudil therapy.Study design: An open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel group, comparative studyMethods: Fifty-one patients (51 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma who experienced insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) control while taking a PG analog were enrolled. The participants were divided into the following treatment groups: PG/timolol fixed combination (switched group) or ripasudil therapy addition (added group). Blood pressure, IOP, and pulse rate were measured at baseline and after 1 and 3 months of study treatment. Adverse reactions and decreased effectiveness were examined.Results: The mean IOP after 3 months of therapy was 14.3 ± 2.2 mmHg in the switched group and 14.7 ± 3.0 mmHg in the added group, both of which were significantly lower than those at baseline (switched, 16.3 ± 3.0 mmHg; added, 16.6 ± 2.8 mmHg; both P <.001). At 3 months, the IOP was reduced by 2.0 ± 1.7 mmHg (11.7 ± 9.6%) in the switched group and by 1.8 ± 2.1 mmHg (10.7 ± 12.5%) in the added group. In the added group, the diastolic blood pressure after 1 month of therapy was significantly lower than that at baseline (P <.05). In the switched group, 10 (40.0%) and 2 (8.0%) participants experienced adverse reactions at 1 and 3 months, respectively. In the added group, 6 (23.1%) and 4 (15.4%) participants experienced adverse reactions at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Treatment was discontinued in 4 participants (16.0%) in the switched group and in 1 participant (3.8%) in the added group.Conclusion: Treatment changes involving either switching from a PG analog to PG/timolol fixed combination eye drops or adding ripasudil to PG analog therapy were equally safe and effective in reducing IOP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the responses of the superficial peripapillary retinal vessel density (VD) and prelaminar flow index (PLFI) to topical Rho-assisted coiled-coil forming protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor ripasudil and alpha-2 agonist brimonidine using optical coherence tomography angiography.Methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized, comparative cohort study. We studied the response of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters to drugs in 24 eyes treated with ripasudil and 23 eyes treated with brimonidine at the Sensho-kai Eye Institute. After division by the signal strength (SS), we compared the responses of peripapillary VD/SS and PLFI/unit area (UA)/SS to topical eye drops in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH).Results: In the superficial peripapillary retina, VD/SS increased significantly in the ripasudil-treated eyes (12.5 ± 21.7%, P = 0.018), but not in the brimonidine-treated eyes (− 2.0 ± 13.8%, P = 0.484). In the deeper area of the optic disc, the changes in the PLFI/UA/SS in the brimonidine-treated eyes (+ 0.9 ± 8.9%, P = 1.00) and ripasudil-treated eyes (− 1.3 ± 8.5%, P = 0.241) were not significant. Multivariate discriminant analysis showed that the change in the peripapillary VD/SS was the most important parameter (P = 0.0186) for differentiating ripasudil- and brimonidine-treated eyes.Conclusions: The topical ROCK inhibitor ripasudil enhanced the peripapillary VD in POAG and OH, whereas the alpha-2 agonist brimonidine did not. The PLFI did not respond to either drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the initial experience, efficacy, and safety of ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate (ripasudil), a Rho-associated kinase inhibitor eye drop, for uveitic glaucoma.Methods: In this retrospective case series, we retrieved the clinical data of 21 eyes from 19 patients with open-angle uveitic glaucoma who were treated with ripasudil at Kobe University Hospital. We analyzed the median intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions after ripasudil treatment and collected the information on the adverse events that were encountered during the course of this treatment period.Results: The causes of uveitis were sarcoidosis (29%), Behçet’s disease (14%), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (10%), others (15%), and unclassified (33%). Of total, 19 (90%) eyes were treated with topical, periocular, and/or systemic steroid therapies. The median number of glaucoma medications used before ripasudil treatment was 2, and the median follow-up time was 13 months. The median IOPs were 23 mmHg at baseline, 16 mmHg at 1 month, and 18 mmHg at 12 months with significant IOP reductions of − 3 mmHg at 1 month and − 2 mmHg at 12 months (P = 0.0050). Of total, 11 (52%) eyes with an IOP reduction ≥ 3 mmHg at 1 month (responders) showed a significant median IOP decrease at 12 months compared with non-responders (− 5 versus 0 mmHg, P = 0.0242). Two adverse events were observed: rashes on the back and transient conjunctival hyperemia.Conclusions: Ripasudil appears to be safe and substantially reduce IOP in eyes with uveitic glaucoma if the eye is a responder. Ripasudil could be an option for the treatment of uveitic glaucoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Ripasudil accelerates aqueous humour drainage along the trabecular meshwork—Schlemm’s canal route and has been approved for clinical use in Japan. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of adding ripasudil to existing treatment regimens to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma.Methods: A total of 119 eyes from 119 subjects (61 men, 58 women) with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had ripasudil added to their treatment regimens between December 2014 and June 2015 were included. An average of 3.8 ± 1.0 anti-glaucoma medications was in use before adding ripasudil. Subjects were divided into four groups based on the number of medications included in the original treatment regimen: ≤2, 3, 4, or ≥5 medications. The IOP was compared before and after 1 and 3 months of treatment with ripasudil for all subjects and between groups. Patients for whom ripasudil use was discontinued within 3 months were also examined.Results: The IOP was significantly lower in all patients after 1 month (17.5 ± 4.5 mmHg) and 3 months (16.8 ± 4.2 mmHg) of treatment than it was before (19.8 ± 5.3 mmHg, p < 0.0001). All groups were equivalent in the rate and magnitude of IOP change. Ripasudil administration was discontinued in five patients (4.2%) prior to the end of the study: three were lost to follow-up and two underwent glaucoma surgery.Conclusion: Adding ripasudil to existing glaucoma treatment regimens is effective and safe in reducing IOP, regardless of the number of medications in use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the one-year efficacy, ability to lower intraocular pressure, and tolerability of ripasudil, a rho-kinase inhibitor, in patients with glaucoma inadequately controlled with maximum medical therapy. Methods: This prospective, non-comparative, interventional case-series study included 39 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma inadequately controlled with maximum medical therapy before treatment with ripasudil. Ripasudil was administered twice per day as adjunctive therapy to ongoing glaucoma treatment. The primary endpoint was the degree of intraocular pressure reduction after 12 months of treatment; the secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events. Results: We examined 39 eyes. The intraocular pressure reduction (given as the relative percentage of intraocular pressure reduction) from baseline was −2.6 mmHg (−15.5%; 95% confidence interval, −1.1 to −3.9 mmHg; P < 0.001) after 12 months of treatment. The adverse events were conjunctival hyperemia (all patients), blepharitis (three), allergic conjunctivitis (two), punctate keratitis (two), and ophthalmalgia (one). Conclusions: Treatment with ripasudil decreased intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma that was poorly controlled with maximal medical therapy, and it was well-tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Ripasudil, a Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, is a novel drug for glaucoma in Japan. ROCK inhibition not only reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) but also increases ocular blood flow. We investigated the effects of ripasudil on optic disc blood flow (ODBF) in rabbit eyes and in isolated rabbit ciliary arteries. Methods: We measured IOP by tonometry and ODBF by laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) in male Dutch rabbits. A single drop (20 μL) of 0.8% ripasudil was delivered to the ocular surface after topical application of phenylephrine hydrochloride to reduce the ODBF. The effects of ripasudil on isolated rabbit ciliary artery smooth muscle contractions were measured in vitro with a myograph. Results: Ripasudil inhibited the reduction of ODBF induced by phenylephrine at 30 and 120 min after instillation ( P < .05). The blood flow change was not significantly correlated with the IOP change. Ripasudil induced a concentration-dependent relaxation in isolated rabbit ciliary arteries precontracted with a high-potassium solution. This relaxation was not mediated through the endothelium-dependent activities of nitric oxide synthase, prostacyclin, or the large-conductance calcium-activated K channel as shown by the inability of specific inhibitors of these pathways to block the ripasudil-induced relaxation. Conclusions: Taken together, our results showed that ripasudil not only decreased IOP but also increased ODBF in rabbits. However, the changes in IOP were not correlated with the changes in ODBF. Ripasudil also induced a concentration-dependent relaxation of isolated rabbit ciliary arteries through a NO-independent mechanism. Further investigation of the effect of ripasudil on ODBF is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the additive intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects and safety of the selective Rho kinase inhibitor, 0.4% ripasudil, in patients with glaucoma not adequately controlled by other maximal tolerated medical therapies.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 92 glaucoma patients who received ripasudil as an additive glaucoma treatment. In spite of receiving prior maximal tolerated medical therapies, all patients had uncontrolled glaucoma before receiving ripasudil. IOP was recorded at all follow-up dates.Results: The study population consisted of 43 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), 28 normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), ten secondary glaucoma, seven exfoliation glaucoma, and four developmental glaucoma patients. After ripasudil administration, there was a significant decrease in the IOP. The mean pre-administration IOP and % IOP reduction at the last follow-up were 19.7 ± 4.9 mmHg and 6.5 ± 17.0% for POAG, 15.5 ± 2.0 mmHg and 2.3 ± 10.4% for NTG, 22.8 ± 8.3 mmHg and 19.1 ± 13.5% for secondary glaucoma, 22.5 ± 4.4 mmHg and 2.1 ± 14.5% for exfoliation glaucoma, and 20.2 ± 8.9 mmHg and 11.4 ± 23.1% for developmental glaucoma, respectively. Side effects led to ripasudil discontinuation in 13 patients, with five exhibiting an allergic reaction, six developing blepharitis, and two having a burning sensation.Conclusions: Use of ripasudil as an adjunctive therapy resulted in lowering of the IOP. Ripasudil was well tolerated.Funding: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (26462689). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]