Search

This study was conducted to retrospectively compare the area under the curve (AUC) and the total clearance of busulfan (Bu) following oral and intravenous (IV) administrations and to determine which intravenous dose generated equivalent exposure to that of the oral form that has been marketed for decades. Patient pharmacokinetics were assessed at dose 9 during a conditioning regimen for stem-cell transplantation and included data from 277 patients for oral Bu (71 from fixed-dose studies and 206 from studies with dose adjustment allowed) and 120 patients for IV Bu (fixed dose). AUCs were compared between patients with fixed dose of oral Bu ( n = 71, 1 mg/kg) and those of IV Bu ( n = 120, 0.8 mg/kg). Total clearances were calculated for all 277 patients with oral Bu and compared to those with IV Bu, with the ratio of IV-to-oral clearance representing the absolute bioavailability of the oral form. Oral and IV populations differed on disease-type distribution but presented comparable demography parameters. IV Bu dosing was mostly based on the ideal body weight index while actual body weight or adjusted ideal body weight indexes were mostly used for oral. When normalised to comparable indexes, bioequivalent AUCs were achieved between oral and IV populations. Oral Bu bioavailability was about 80% when calculated from the ratio of IV-to-oral total clearances. This retrospective study carried out on a large set of data showed that similar plasma exposures were achieved with 1.0 mg/kg oral Bu or 0.8 mg/kg IV Bu. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral busulfan clearance is age-dependent and children experience a wide variability in plasma exposure. BSA- or age-based dosing is used with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to reduce this variability. A new intravenous (IV) dosing of busulfan (Bu) based on body weight, designed to improve AUC targeting without TDM and dose-adjustment, was prospectively evaluated. Bu was administered as a 2 h IV infusion every 6 h over 4 days (16 administrations). Five dose levels were defined on body weight as follows: 1.0 mg/kg for <9 kg; 1.2 mg/kg for 9 to <16 kg; 1.1 mg/kg for 16–23 kg; 0.95 mg/kg for >23–34 kg; 0.80 mg/kg for >34 kg. Bu treatment was followed by Cyclophosphamide or Melphalan prior to allogeneic or autologous transplantation in 55 children aged 0.3–17.2 years (median 5.6 years). No difference in AUC values was observed between weight strata (mean ± SD 1248 ± 205 μmol·min), whereas a significant difference in Bu clearance was demonstrated. This new dosing enabled to achieve a mean exposure comparable to that in adults. At dose 1, 91% of patients achieved the targeted AUC range (900–1500 μmol·min) while no patients were underexposed. At doses 9 and 13, over 75% of patients remained within that target whilst most of the others were slightly above. Successful engraftment was achieved in all patients. In conclusion, from infants to adults this new dosing enabled, without TDM and dose adjustment, to successfully target a therapeutic AUC window. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patient’s preference is for oral chemotherapy when both oral and i.v. are available, provided that efficacy is equivalent. Reliable switch from oral to i.v. is possible if correspondence between respective doses has been established. Vinorelbine oral was developed as a line extension of VRL i.v. on the basis that similar AUCs result in similar activities. From a first crossover study on 24 patients receiving VRL 25 mg/m2 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 oral data extrapolation concluded on AUCs bioequivalence between Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 oral. A new trial was performed to support this calculation. In a crossover design study on patients (PS 0-1) with advanced solid tumours (44% breast carcinoma), VRL was administered (30 mg/m2 i.v., 80 mg/m2 oral) with a standard meal and 5-HT3 antagonists, at 2 weeks interval. Pharmacokinetics was performed over 168 h and VRL was measured by LC-MS/MS. Statistics included bioequivalence tests. Forty-eight patients were evaluable for PK: median age 58 years (25–71), PS0/PS1: 20/28, M/F: 11/37. Mean AUCs were 1,230 ± 290 and 1,216 ± 521 ng/ml for i.v. and oral, respectively. The confidence interval of the AUC ratio (0.83–1.03) was within the required regulatory range (0.8–1.25) and proved the bioequivalence between the two doses. The absolute bioavailability was 37.8 ± 16.0%, and close to the value from the first study (40%). Patient tolerability was globally comparable between both forms with no significant difference on either haematological or non-haematological toxicities (grade 3–4). This new study, conducted on a larger population, confirmed the reliable dose correspondence previously established between vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 oral and 30 mg/m2 i.v. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An IV form of busulfan (IV Bu) has recently become available for high dose conditioning regimen before haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This IV form is expected to reduce the high pharmacokinetic variability exhibited with oral busulfan and as a result, to better target the plasma area under the curve (AUC). Pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV Bu was investigated on 127 adult patients (333 PK administrations) who received 0.8 mg·kg−1 of Bu as a 2-h infusion every 6 h over 4 days, followed by cyclophosphamide (60 mg·kg−1 day−1×2). A retrospective population PK analysis was carried out to search for important predictive factors of IV Bu PK and to develop a limited sampling strategy (LSS) through Bayesian methodology. The analysis was conducted using the Non Linear Mixed Effect methodology and included a validation process on an independent data set. Adjusted Ideal Body Weight (AIBW) and Body Surface Area (BSA) were the best covariates to explain the inter-patient variability. The final inter-patient variability (CV=16%) in IV Bu clearance (Cltot) was estimated close to the intra-patient variability (CV=13%). There was neither age-dependency nor gender effect. IV Bu Cltot was not affected by elevated hepatic enzymes or by co-administration of either fluconazole or acetaminophen, and was not altered in heavily pre-treated or pre-transplanted patients. Normalised Cltot based on either AIBW or BSA was comparable between normal and obese patients (BMI=18–26.9 kg·m−2, >26.9 kg·m−2, respectively) whereas significant differences existed when based on either actual (ABW) or ideal body weight (IBW). As a consequence, no dose adjustment is required in obese patients when using a AIBW- or BSA-based dose calculation. A fixed dose of 0.80 mg·kg−1 of AIBW or 29 mg·m−2 of BSA yielded an average AUC of 1,200 μM·min, with 80% of patients within the “therapeutic” AUC range of 900–1,500 μM·min. Alternatively, 0.80 mg·kg−1 based on either ABW or IBW for normal patients and on AIBW for obese patients would achieve the same performance. A limited sampling strategy based on a Bayesian methodology was developed and validated on an independent dataset: AUCs obtained from one to two samplings were demonstrated to be reliably estimated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A retrospective population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed in 24 pediatric patients (PEDS) (0.45-16.7 years old) receiving i.v. busulfan/cyclophosphamide (i.v. Bu/Cy 4) regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. I.V. Bu doses were given as a 2-hour infusion every 6 h over 4 days. Initial dosing of i.v. Bu was 1 mg/kg for children &les;4 years old and 0.8 mg/kg for patients >4 years old. Bu plasma concentrations at doses 1, 9 and 13 were analyzed through a multivariate NONMEM analysis. A close log-linear relationship between body weight (BW) and i.v. Bu clearance was demonstrated with no further age-dependency or gender effect. The interpatient coefficient of variation (CV) in Bu clearance significantly decreased from 56% (covariate-free model) to 19% (BW covariate model) and reproducible i.v. Bu exposure between doses was illustrated (intraindividual CV =9%). Based on the PPK model, a novel Bu dosing regimen (ie: doses in mg/kg adjusted to discrete weight categories) for a better AUC targeting was developed by simulation on 1000 patients. Age-based dosing was demonstrated not to be clinically relevant with i.v. Bu. Use of the new BW-based dosing appears to be more appropriate for the PEDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study, we gave 12 healthy male volunteers placebo or milnacipran orally, such that each volunteer received placebo and two doses of milnacipran. Blood samples taken before and at various times after dosing were analysed for plasma concentrations of unchanged milnacipran and the inhibitory effect of the plasma on the uptake ofH-5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) into normal human platelets or ofH-noradrenaline into rat hypothalamus homogenate. The mean maximal inhibition of 5HT and noradrenaline uptake was correlated with drug dose. The inhibition of 5HT uptake was correlated with the inhibition of noradrenaline uptake and both were correlated with plasma concentration of unchanged drug at all times and doses tested. Thus, milnacipran, when given orally to man, circulates in a biologically active form with similar potency for the inhibition of 5HT and noradrenaline uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]