Search

Background: Radioactive tracer injections for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping can be painful. In this randomized trial, we compared four approaches to topical pain control for radiotracer injections. Methods: Breast cancer patients were randomized (9 April 2021–8 May 2022) to receive the institutional standard of ice prior to injection (n = 44), or one of three treatments: ice plus a vibrating distraction device (Buzzy®; n = 39), 4% lidocaine patch (n = 44), or 4% lidocaine patch plus ice plus Buzzy® (n = 40). Patients completed the Wong-Baker FACES® pain score (primary outcome) and a satisfaction with pain control received scale (secondary). Nuclear medicine technologists (n = 8) rated perceived pain control and ease of administration for each patient. At study conclusion, technologists rank-ordered treatments. Data were analyzed as intention-to-treat. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare pain scores of control versus pooled treatment arms (primary) and then control to each treatment arm individually (secondary). Results: There were no differences in pain scores between the control and treatment groups, both pooled and individually. Eighty-five percent of patients were 'satisfied/very satisfied' with treatment received, with no differences between groups. No differences in providers' perceptions of pain were observed, although providers perceived treatments involving Buzzy© more difficult to administer (p < 0.001). Providers rated lidocaine patch as the easiest, with ice being second. Conclusion: In this randomized trial, no differences in patient-reported pain or satisfaction with treatment was observed between ice and other topical treatments. Providers found treatments using Buzzy® more difficult to administer. Given patient satisfaction and ease of administration, ice is a reasonable standard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There is a continuous search for imaging techniques with high sensitivity and specificity for brain tumors. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has shown promise, though many PET agents either have a low tumor specificity or impractical physical half-lives. [124I]CLR1404 is a small molecule alkylphosphocholine analogue that is thought to bind to plasma membrane lipid rafts and has shown high tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) in a previous pilot study in brain tumor patients. This study attempts to define the clinical value of [124I]CLR1404 PET/CT (aka CLR124).Procedures: Adult patients with new or suspected recurrence of high-grade primary or metastatic brain tumors (N = 27) were injected with [124I]CLR1404 followed by PET/CT at 6, 24, and 48 h. Standard uptake values (SUV) and TBR values were calculated for all time points. Uptake of [124I]CLR1404 was qualitatively assessed, compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and correlated with clinical outcome. Final diagnosis (N = 25) was established based on surgically resected tissue or long-term follow-up.Results: Positive uptake with high TBR was detected in all but one patient with a final diagnosis of primary/recurrent brain tumor (12/13) and in less than half of patients with treatment-related changes (5/12). Concordance between [124I]CLR1404 uptake and contrast enhancement on MRI was seen in < 40 %, with no concordance between T2-hyperintensities and uptake. No significant difference in overall outcome was found between patients with and without [124I]CLR1404 uptake.Conclusions: The uptake pattern in these patients suggests a very high sensitivity of [124I]CLR1404 PET/CT for diagnosing tumor tissue; however, tumor specificity needs to be further defined. Relative lack of concordance with standard MRI characteristics suggests that [124I]CLR1404 PET/CT provides additional information about brain tumors compared to MRI alone, potentially improving clinical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Rapid disease progression associated with increased tumor proliferation has been observed during withdrawal of anti-angiogenic therapy. We characterize the dynamics of withdrawal flare for axitinib.Methods: Thirty patients with metastatic solid malignancies received axitinib for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week drug holiday. Twenty patients suitable for PET imaging received scans with (18)F-3'deoxy-3'fluoro-L-thymidine (FLT), a marker of proliferation. Plasma VEGF and axitinib pharmacokinetic levels were also assessed at specified time points.Results: During axitinib withdrawal, significant increases in both SUVmax (+22 %; p = 0.006) and SUVmean (+20 %; p = 0.001) were observed. Significant increases relative to peak axitinib concentration were observed at day 2 withdrawal for SUVmax and SUVmean, with no further significant increase from day 2 to day 7 of withdrawal. No significant change in SUVmax or SUVmean was observed during the treatment period, relative to baseline. VEGF concentration significantly increased when on drug (p < 0.001) and decreased back to a level indistinguishable from baseline by day 7 of drug washout (p = 0.448). No correlation between change in VEGF and change in imaging metrics was observed.Conclusions: A significant increase in tumor proliferation was observed during withdrawal of axitinib therapy, and this flare occurred within 2 days of axitinib withdrawal. An exploratory analysis indicated that this flare may be associated with poor clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The clinical utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in comparison to standard workup in patients with known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unknown.Procedures: Clinical data were collected on seven patients with known or suspected IBD undergoing PET/CT. Standard workup included history, physical exam, laboratory tests, colonoscopy and/or cross-sectional imaging. We divided the intestine into five regions [small bowel and four colon (ascending, transverse, descending and rectosigmoid)] and graded relative standard uptake values 0, 1, 2 or 3 by comparison to the liver, using a region-of-interest analysis (0 = no activity, 1 = liver, 2 and 3 = significant inflammation).Results: In patients 1 and 2, PET/CT demonstrated more activity than we thought clinically present. The other patients avoided unnecessary escalation or initiation of IBD therapy based on PET/CT results. Compared with standard workup, all seven patients had superior results when therapeutic decisions were based on PET/CT.Conclusions: We found PET/CT to be very useful in diagnosis and management in patients with known or suspected IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Accurate staging of esophageal cancer (ECA) is critical in determining appropriate therapy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning can be used, but limited data exists regarding the use of combined PET/CT fusion imaging and EUS in ECA staging. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of integrated PET/CT imaging and EUS in the staging of ECA.Procedures: Identification of patients diagnosed with ECA from 2004 to 2007 that underwent staging PET/CT and EUS. Data regarding tumor detection, lymph node identification, presence of metastatic disease, and affect on patient management were collected and compared between PET/CT and EUS.Results: Eighty-one patients (65 male, 16 female) were identified with mean age of 63.5 years who underwent EUS and PET/CT to stage known ECA. PET/CT identified the primary tumor in 74/81 (91.4%) of cases, compared to 81/81 (100%) with EUS. Locoregional adenopathy was seen by PET/CT in 29/81 (35.8%) of cases, compared to 49/81 (60.5%) by EUS (p = 0.0001). PET/CT identified celiac axis adenopathy in 8/81 (9.9%) of cases, compared to 11/81 (13.6%) with EUS (p = 0.5050). PET/CT identified 17/81 (21.0%) of patients with distant metastases who subsequently did not undergo attempt at curative surgical resection.Conclusions: In ECA, EUS is superior to PET/CT for T staging and in identifying locoregional nodes, while PET/CT provides M staging. EUS and integrated PET/CT appear to independently affect treatment decisions, indicating complimentary and necessary roles in the staging of ECA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appropriate 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) determination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) before and after clinical improvement to see if this determination correlates with clinical activity.Procedures: We performed PET-computed tomography (PET/CT) on five patients before and after successful medical therapy in patients with moderately active IBD. Each patient had five bowel segments scored (0-3) for the appropriate FDG-PET determination.Results: There were five patients [Crohn's disease (CD) = 3, ulcerative colitis = 2] who were studied an average of 437 days (range, 77-807) after initial PET/CT scan. All patients showed significant improvement in physician global assessment scores (p = 0.004) and underwent repeat PET/CT. The total score of all segments was 32 pretreatment and 14 posttreatment (p < 0.01). Of 11 pretreatment active segments, nine (82%) segments either became inactive or displayed decreased activity, while two showed no change (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Appropriate FDG-PET determination decreases with successful treatment of inflammation in active IBD and correlates with symptom improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]