Search

Purpose of Review: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of genetic markers associated with heart failure (HF) and its underlying causative diseases, such as cardiomyopathies. It highlights the relevance of genetic biomarkers in diagnosing HF, predicting prognosis, potentially identifying its preclinical stages and identifying targets to enable the implementation of individualized medicine approaches. Recent Findings: The prevalence of HF is increasing due to an aging population but with greater access to disease-modifying therapies. Advanced diagnostic tools such as cardiac magnetic resonance, nuclear imaging, and AI-enabled diagnostic testing are now being utilized to further characterize HF patients. Additionally, the importance of genetic testing in HF diagnosis and management is increasingly being recognized. Genetic biomarkers, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and rare genetic variants, are emerging as crucial tools for diagnosing HF substrates, determining prognosis and increasingly directing therapy. These genetic insights are key to optimizing HF management and delivering personalized treatment tailored to individual patients. Summary: HF is a complex syndrome affecting millions globally, characterized by high mortality and significant economic burden. Understanding the underlying etiologies of HF is essential for improving management and clinical outcomes. Recent advances highlight the use of multimodal assessments, including AI-enabled diagnostics and genetic testing, to better characterize and manage HF. Genetic biomarkers are particularly promising in identifying preclinical HF stages and providing personalized treatment options. The genetic contribution to HF is heterogeneous, with both monogenic and polygenic bases playing a role. These developments underscore the shift towards personalized medicine in HF management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) is not reliable in identifying subtle systolic dysfunction. Speckle Tracking (ST) plays a promising role and hemodynamic forces (HDFs) are emerging as marker of LV function. The role of LV myocardial deformation and HDFs was investigated in a cohort of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and normal LVEF. Two hundred fifty three patients (median age 79 years, IQR 73 – 83 years) with mild (n = 87), moderate (n =77) and severe AS (n =89) were retrospectively enrolled. 2D echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential strain (GCS) and HDFs were determined. The worsening of AS was associated with raising inappropriate LV mass (p < 0.001) and declined LVEF, despite being in the normal range (p < 0.001). ST and HDFs parameters declined as the AS became severe (p<0.0001, for all). When patients were grouped based on the median of LV endocardial GLS value (> -19,9%) and LV systolic longitudinal force (LVsysLF) value (< 12,49), patients with impaired ST and lower HDFs components had increased incidence of aortic valve replacement (AVR) and worse survival (p <0.024 and p <0.037, respectively). Among ST and HDFs parameters, only LVsysLF was independently associated with AVR and all causes mortality on multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-0.99; p= 0.012). Reduced values of LVsysLF were associated with AVR and reduced survival in AS patients. LVsysLF could provide useful information in the stratification of patients with AS and possibly in the choice of timing for AVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite growing evidence about myocardial injury in hospitalized COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, the mechanism behind this injury is only poorly understood and little is known about its association with SARS-CoV-2-mediated myocarditis. Furthermore, definite evidence of the presence and role of SARS-CoV-2 in cardiomyocytes in the clinical scenario is still lacking. Methods: We histologically characterized myocardial tissue of 40 patients deceased with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first wave of the pandemic. Clinical data were also recorded and analyzed. In case of findings supportive of myocardial inflammation, histological analysis was complemented by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens and in situ RNA hybridization for the detection of viral genomes. Results: Both chronic and acute myocardial damage was invariably present, correlating with the age and comorbidities of our population. Myocarditis of overt entity was found in one case (2.5%). SARS-CoV-2 genome was not found in the cardiomyocytes of the patient with myocarditis, while it was focally and negligibly present in cardiomyocytes of patients with known viral persistence in the lungs and no signs of myocardial inflammation. The presence of myocardial injury was not associated with myocardial inflammatory infiltrates. Conclusions: In this autopsy cohort of COVID-19 patients, myocarditis is rarely found and not associated with SARS-CoV-2 presence in cardiomyocytes. Chronic and acute forms of myocardial damage are constantly found and correlate with the severity of COVID-19 disease and pre-existing comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Myocarditis is a polymorphic disease, both in its presentation and clinical course. Recent data suggests that the genetic background, interacting with environmental factors, could be diriment both in the susceptibility and evolution of myocarditis in different clinical presentations. The aim of this paper is to expose the current available evidences and the evolving concepts on this topic, in order to provide insight for improving the clinical management of those patients. In this regard, the main goal is an optimal characterization of each patient's risk, with the purpose of individualizing the treatment and the follow-up. Recent Findings: The latest research highlights the possible prognostic role of some pathogenic mutations that could create a vulnerable myocardium prone to myocardial inflammation and also to the development of a long-lasting cardiomyopathy. Summary: The identification of these genetic defects and of myocarditis patients requiring genetic testing is emerging as a challenge for the future. In fact, identifying a possible genetic background responsible for a particularly high-risk profile could be of extreme importance in improving management of myocarditis. This and many other aspects in the genetics of myocarditis remain uncovered, and further studies are expected based to refine our daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]