Search

The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the hip abduction angle (HAA) and lower limb alignment as well as the clinical assessments in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) patients. A total of 90 patients who underwent OWHTO were included. The demographic characteristics and clinical assessments (the Visual Analogue Scale for activities of daily living, the Japanese knee osteoarthritis measure, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Knee Society score, the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, the single standing (SLS) test and muscle strength) were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups according to the HAA at 1 month after operation: the HAA (−) group (HAA < 0°) and the HAA (+) group (HAA ≥ 0°). Clinical scores except for the SLS test and radiographic parameters except for the posterior tibia slope (PTS), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) were significantly improved at 2 years postoperatively. Regarding the two groups, scores on the TUG test in the HAA (−) group were significantly lower than those in the HAA (+) group (p = 0.011). The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), weight bearing line (WBLR) and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) in the HAA (−) group were significantly higher than those in the HAA (+) group (p < 0.001, 0.001 and p = 0.025). In contrast, the LDFA in the HAA (−) group were significantly lower than those in the HAA (+) group (p < 0.001). The TUG test and the LDFA were weakly positively correlated with the HAA (r = 0.34, 0.42, p < 0.001 and 0.001). In contrast, the HKA, WBLR and KJLO had a weak negative correlation with the HAA (r = − 0.43, − 0.38 and − 0.37, p < 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001). This study showed the postoperative HAA was significantly associated with the TUG test and the HKA, WBLR, LDFA, and KJLO. A higher postoperative HAA might induce varus recurrence and poor outcomes of the gait parameter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Bone bruises with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are well studied, but the association between bone bruises and multiple factors is unclear. The main objective of this study was to investigate the association between bone bruising and ACL injury and concomitant injury as well as clinical and functional scores. The second objective was to investigate the presence and distribution patterns of bone bruises. Method: A total of 176 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction for primary ACL injury were included. The demographic characteristics and responses to clinical and functional assessments (the Visual Analog Scale for activities of daily living and sports, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System, the Lysholm score, the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and side-to-side difference in anterior laxity) were recorded at the initial visit. Concomitant injuries were evaluated by intraoperative assessment. Results: Bone bruises were detected in 141 patients (80.1%). The lateral femoral condyle (LFC) was the most common site in 116 patients (65.9%), followed by the lateral tibial plateau (LTP) in 82 patients (46.6%), medial tibial plateau (MTP) in 47 patients (26.7%) and medial femoral condyle (MFC) in 29 patients (16.5%). Regarding the distribution patterns, bone bruising at only the LFC, which was the most common pattern, was detected in 38 patients (27.0%). Bone bruising at the LTP or MTP was significantly associated with lateral (LM) and medial meniscus (MM) tears (odds ratios 4.0, 3.0, 4.3 and 40.5, 95% confidence intervals 1.5–11.6, 1.2–15.1, 1.2–17.3 and 8.6–283.0, respectively). No marked differences in the functional or clinical scores were noted. The severity of bone bruising at the MTP was significantly associated with MM tears and that at the LTP was significantly associated with LM tears. (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study showed association between bone bruising at LTP and LM tears or at MTP and MM tears. Additionally, it provided detailed information on the presence and distribution patterns of bone bruises at each anatomic site. These findings are clinically relevant and will aid in preoperatively diagnosing meniscus tears in cases of ACL injury. Level of evidence: Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to detect the pre- and intra-operative influential factors for lower limb alignment correction error in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).Methods: This study involved 69 patients (71 knees) undergoing OWHTO for primary medial osteoarthritis. The weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) were measured on radiographs preoperatively and at 1 month after surgery, and the differences between the pre- and postoperative values were calculated. The correction angle during surgery was also investigated. The radiological correction angle was defined as the difference between the pre- and postoperative MPTA. The correction error was defined as the difference between the correction angle during surgery and the radiological correction angle. The ideal correction angle was defined as when the postoperative WBL passed through Fujisawa's point (WBL = 62.5%), and the alignment error was defined as the difference between the postoperative WBL ratio and 62.5. The correlations among the alignment error, the correction error, correction angle during surgery, pre- and postoperative WBL ratio, MPTA, and JLCA and the differences between the pre and postoperative WBL ratio, MPTA, and JLCA were investigated. In addition, the factor most influential on the alignment error was determined.Results: The preoperative MPTA was the only predictor of the alignment error after OWHTO. The alignment error was positively correlated with the correction error and correction angle during surgery, and negatively correlated with pre- and postoperative WBL ratio, MPTA, and differences between the pre- and postoperative WBL ratio and JLCA.Conclusion: The preoperative MPTA was the only pre- and intra-operative predictor of the alignment error after OWHTO. The larger the correction angle, the greater the alignment error. The MPTA was recommended as an indicator for improving the correction accuracy. Accurate correction based on the MPTA provides good lower limb alignment and better clinical results.Level Of Evidence: III Case-control study/Retrospective comparative study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]