Search

Purpose: To examine the subjective and objective audiological benefits of the Osia system compared to devices commonly implanted prior to the introduction of this system. Methods: Osia recipients with either conductive hearing loss (CHL/MHL) (n = 9) or single-sided deafness (SSD) (n = 8) who underwent surgery from February 2021 to March 2022 were prospectively recruited. The audiological outcomes and usage rate of Osia implantees were compared with those of retrospectively recruited patients implanted with other devices (n = 50). The subjective satisfaction of the Osia implantees was also evaluated through questionnaires. Results: All users of the Osia system were classified as regular users. In the CHL/MHL group, the effective gain of the Osia system (11.1 ± 14.9 dB) surpassed that of the Baha and Bonebridge (− 2.7 ± 12.6 dB) at 2 kHz (p = 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test). Among the devices, the Osia system tended to tolerate the worst bone conduction thresholds, up to the level of 61 dB. In the SSD group, the functional gain of Osia at 4 kHz (37.5 ± 3.1 dB) was higher than that of the Baha and Bonebridge group (26.9 ± 3.0 dB) (p = 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test). Conclusion: The Osia system yielded larger audiological gain than the Baha Attract and Bonebridge devices, especially at high frequencies, leading to substantially higher compliance. The Osia system tended to have the strongest tolerance to aggravated bone conduction thresholds among the available transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants. Therefore, the Osia system could potentially be a good option for CHL/MHL patients with bone conduction thresholds of 50 dB HL or more, as well as patients with SSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate the alteration of PAP compliance after nasal surgery and to determine the optimal indications of nasal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) subjects. Among OSA subjects using PAP devices, 29 subjects who underwent septoturbinoplasty due to nasal obstruction were included and their pre- and postoperative medical and PAP records were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative autoPAP usage data was further assessed by grouping the compliance (the percentage of days with usage ≥ 4 h) data (group 1: the good compliance group; group 2: the poor compliance group). The data showed that 56% of subjects in group 1 complained of nasal obstruction as the only barrier to using a PAP device and about 89% reported experiencing the efficacy of PAP usage. Both the mean and peak average PAP pressures were significantly reduced in group 1 following nasal surgery. Group 2 had multiple subjective problems that interfered with wearing a PAP device and reported a lack of experiencing the efficacy of PAP usage. Preoperative nasal cavity volume values were smaller and absolute blood eosinophil counts were significantly lower in group 1. The current data demonstrate that nasal surgery might increase the compliance of PAP device wear in OSA subjects who complained of only nasal obstruction as a barrier to wearing PAP and who had small nasal cavity volumes combined with allergic inflammation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lateral pharyngeal wall appears to be a critical culprit of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) subjects and relocation pharyngoplasty has been expected to be a promising surgical option to correct retropalatal circumferential narrowing in OSA patients. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of relocation pharyngoplasty and its clinical effectiveness in OSA patients with retropalatal circumferential narrowing. We performed relocation pharyngoplasty combined with nasal surgery in 133 OSA patients with the following characteristics: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) over 10, retropalatal circumferential narrowing greater than grade I when awake, and redundant soft tissue around the lateral pharyngeal wall. The analysis of surgical success rate was performed with the data of 68 subjects who underwent pre and postoperative polysomnography. The objective success rate of relocation pharyngoplasty was 52.9%, and significant reduction of mean AHI with improvement of lowest SpO2 was seen in 69% of patients 3 months after the surgery. The median AHI was decreased from preoperative 37.3 to postoperative 21.4. Median lowest SpO2 changed from 78.4 to 84.1%. Total sleep time, daytime sleepiness, and visual analogue scale for snoring showed improvement as well. Postoperative complications including pain or bleeding were minimal in 133 subjects and a few patients complained of subtle taste loss. Our data demonstrate that relocation pharyngoplasty can be a favorable surgical option fighting against retropalatal circumferential narrowing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]