Search

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX are widely used as first-line regimens for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). When GnP therapy is selected, considering patient age or condition, second-line FOLFIRINOX is sometimes difficult to administer owing to its toxicity. This study aimed to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-IROX (S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan combination) regimens in patients with unresectable PC after first-line GnP failure. This phase-I study used the "3 + 3" dose-escalation design with two dose levels. Patients who failed first-line GnP therapy for unresectable PC were enrolled. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally twice daily on days 1–7, followed by 7 days of rest. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determination of RD. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of potential antitumor activity. Nine patients received the second-line S-IROX regimen. In level-0 (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 120 mg/m2), no patient experienced DLT; however, one patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia. At level-1 (irinotecan increased to 150 mg/m2), one of six patients experienced DLTs, including G3 diarrhea. The RD was confirmed at the level-1 dose. The response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 33.3%, 77.8%, 172 (range:77–422) days, and 414 (101–685) days, respectively. One patient underwent surgery after the second-line S-IROX therapy. Second-line S-IROX treatment was deemed acceptable. The RD was set at level-1 dose (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 150 mg/m2). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFCs) are common adverse events (AEs) after pancreatic surgery and may need interventions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage for POPFCs is increasingly reported, but its appropriate timing has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate treatment outcomes of POPFCs according to the timing of EUS-guided drainage. Methods: Using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, we identified clinical studies published until December 2022 with data comparing outcomes of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage for POPFCs. We pooled data on AEs, mortality, and technical and clinical success rates, using the random-effects model. Results: From 1415 papers identified in the initial literature search, we identified 6 retrospective studies, including 128 and 107 patients undergoing early and delayed EUS-guided drainage for POPFCs. The threshold of early and delayed drainage ranged from 14 to 30 days. Distal pancreatectomy was the major cause of POPFCs, ranging from 44 to 100%. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for AEs was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.64, P = 0.55) comparing early to delayed drainage. There was no procedure-related mortality. Technical success was achieved in all cases and a pooled OR of clinical success was 0.60 (95% CI 0.20–1.83, P = 0.37). Conclusion: POPFCs can be managed by early EUS-guided drainage without an increase in AEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is an effective option for biliary drainage with long-term stent patency. Laser-cut and braided SEMS can be used for bilateral SEMS placement. This study aimed to clarify any differences in the clinical features and proper use of the laser-cut and braided SEMS placement using the stent-in-stent method for UMHBO. Methods: In this study, 78 patients who underwent bilateral stent-in-stent SEMS placement for UMHBO were included. The patients were divided into the laser-cut (n = 33) and braided groups (n = 45). Both groups were compared for technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs), time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), overall survival, and endoscopic reintervention (ERI). Results: There were no significant differences in technical and clinical success rates (laser-cut vs. braided group, 97% vs. 95.6%, P = 1.0), AEs (21.2% vs. 15.6%. P = 0.56), median TRBO (242 days vs. 140 days, P = 0.36), and median overall survival (654 days vs. 675 days, P = 0.58). ERI was required in 15 patients in the laser-cut group and in 20 patients in the braided group. The technical and clinical success rates of ERI (60% vs. 85%) were not significantly different (P = 0.13); however, the median ERI procedure time was significantly longer in the laser-cut group (38 min) than in the braided group (22 min; P = 0.02). Conclusion: No significant difference in initial SEMS placement was noted between the laser-cut and braided groups; however, the laser-cut group required a longer ERI procedure time than that required by the braided group. The use of braided SEMS may be a convenient option for ERI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) commonly develop as complications of acute pancreatitis and ductal disruption due to chronic pancreatitis. In the revised Atlanta classification, PFCs were classified based on the presence of necrosis and duration following the onset of acute pancreatitis. Interventions are required in cases of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis (WON). In the management of these PFCs, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and subsequent direct endoscopic necrosectomy for WON are increasingly utilized as less invasive treatment modalities compared to surgical debridement. To date, researchers have focused predominantly on the technical aspects of endoscopic therapy for symptomatic PFCs. Given the poor physical condition of patients receiving endoscopic treatment for PFCs, systemic support may have a substantial impact on the short- and long-term outcomes of these patients. A multidisciplinary approach is required to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with infected PFCs and their associated comorbidities. However, non-interventional support during the periprocedural period of endoscopic treatment of PFCs has not been fully discussed, and there have been considerable variations in the selection of treatment options between endoscopists and centers. To address these unmet needs in the clinical management of PFCs and promote future research to improve the clinical outcomes, we conducted a review of the literature within a multicenter consortium of expert endoscopists with specific expertise in the endoscopic treatment of PFCs. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on non-interventional supportive care (e.g., continuous lavage, medications, nutritional support, and antimicrobials) and propose potential topics for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Image evaluation of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) and additional time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis enable qualitative and quantitative analyses of pancreatic tumor based on real-time perfusion imaging. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of CEH-EUS with a combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses of pancreatic solid tumors. Methods: Patients were scheduled to undergo EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for pancreatic solid tumors were prospectively enrolled between 11/2016 and 12/2018 and underwent CEH-EUS. The vascular and enhancement patterns were qualitatively evaluated and heterogeneous enhancement was defined to be indicative of malignancy. The echo intensity change during 60 s in the tumor was quantitatively evaluated by time intensity curve analysis. Results: In total, 100 patients were enrolled in this study. The final diagnoses were malignant lesions in 87 patients and benign legions in 13 patients. There were four categories of enhancement and patterns: hypovascular with heterogeneous, hypovascular with homogeneous, hypervascular heterogeneous, and hypervascular homogeneous enhancement. The diagnostic capability of qualitative analysis was the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 62%, and 85%, respectively. With respect to time intensity curve analysis, the time to peak of malignant lesions was significantly shorter than those of benign lesions (P = 0.0009) with an optimal cutoff value of 12.81 s on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. With the combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were improved to 100%, 54%, and 94%, respectively. Conclusions: CEH-EUS with combined qualitative and quantitative analyses for pancreatic tumors might be useful as a complement for EUS-FNA. The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000025192) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To provide updated clinico-epidemiological information on chronic pancreatitis (CP) in Japan. Methods: We conducted a two-stage nationwide epidemiological survey; the number of CP patients was estimated in the first-stage survey, and their clinical features were examined in the second-stage survey. We surveyed patients with CP who had visited hospitals in 2016 and were diagnosed according to the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2009 (DC2009). Furthermore, we validated the new Japanese diagnostic criteria (DC2019) in patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009. Results: The number of patients with definite/probable CP in 2016 was 56,520 (prevalence, 44.5 per 100,000 persons), and that of early CP was 4470 (prevalence, 3.5 per 100,000 persons). We obtained detailed clinical information of 2150 patients with definite/probable CP and 249 patients with early CP. Compared with the early CP cases, the definite/probable CP cases had higher proportions of male (4.8 vs. 1.3), alcohol-related etiology (72.0% vs. 45.8%), smoking history (69.6% vs. 41.0%), diabetes mellitus (42.3% vs. 19.3%), and past history of acute pancreatitis (AP) (50.4% vs. 22.1%). Among the patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009, 93 (37.3%) were diagnosed with early CP according to DC2019, but the diagnosis of the remaining 156 (62.7%) patients was downgraded. Alcohol-related etiology, smoking history, early disease onset, and past history of AP were associated with the maintenance of early CP diagnosis in DC2019. Conclusion: We clarified the current status of CP in Japan. Further validation studies are warranted to clarify the diagnostic utility of DC2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, a novel 22-gauge needle with three symmetric needle points and crown-shaped cutting heels, known as a Franseen needle, has been developed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB).Aim: To assess the histological material acquisition rate and histological diagnostic capability of the 22-gauge Franseen needle (AC22) during EUS-FNB for solid lesions.Methods: This study was designed as an open-label, multicenter, prospective, single-arm pilot study of EUS-FNB using AC22 for the diagnosis of solid lesions. Three passes of FNB using AC22 were performed for all lesions. The primary endpoints were the histological material acquisition rate and histological diagnostic capability. The secondary endpoints were the technical success rate, quality of histological samples, number of passes for diagnosis, and safety.Results: Between September 2017 and May 2018, 75 patients were enrolled. The final diagnoses were malignancy in 65 and benign in 10. Three passes of FNB were technically successful in all patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the malignancy of histological analyses were 92.3% (60/65), 100% (10/10), and 93.3% (70/75), respectively, for the first pass and 95.4% (62/65), 100% (10/10), and 96% (72/75), respectively, for combined three passes. The diagnostic yield plateaued after the second pass. Sufficient tissue samples for histological interpretation were obtained in 96% (72/75) and 100% (75/75) patients for the single pass and combined three passes, respectively. Two patients (2.7%) developed mild pancreatitis as an adverse event.Conclusion: EUS-FNB using AC22 showed high histological diagnostic capability with the high first pass yield.Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN ID: UMIN000036641). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Both fully covered (FC) and partially covered (PC) self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are now commercially available for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). While FCSEMS can be easily removed at the time of re-interventions, it is theoretically prone to migration. However, few comparative data between FC and PC SEMSs have been reported.Aims: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of FCSEMS with those of PCSEMS.Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective study of FCSEMS for unresectable distal MBO with a historical control of PCSEMS, which was previously reported as the WATCH study. The primary outcome was recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and secondary outcomes were stent migration, stent removal, stent-related adverse events, and survival.Results: A total of 151 cases with unresectable distal MBO undergoing FCSEMS placement were enrolled and compared with a historical cohort of 141 cases undergoing PCSEMS placement. No significant differences were found in the rate of RBO (29 vs. 33%; P = 0.451), time to RBO (318 vs. 373 days; P = 0.382), and survival (229 vs. 196 days; P = 0.177) between FCSEMS and PCSEMS. The rate of stent migration also did not differ significantly between the two groups (14 vs. 8%; P = 0.113). The removal of FCSEMSs was successful in all 24 attempted cases (100%).Conclusions: FCSEMSs appeared comparable to PCSEMSs in terms of RBO without a significant increase in stent migration rate in patients with unresectable distal MBO.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000007131. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The necessity of histological analysis is increasing. A 19-gauge histology needle (PC19) in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has recently been developed and has shown high yields of tissue acquisition and histological diagnosis.Aims: To compare the histological diagnostic yield in single-pass EUS-FNA for solid lesions using PC19 and a standard 19-gauge needle (EC19).Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with solid lesions were enrolled and underwent one pass with each of PC19 and EC19 for EUS-FNA with the randomized order of the needles. The primary endpoint was the histological diagnostic accuracy. The secondary endpoints were the feasibility, yield of histological core, cytological and overall diagnostic accuracies, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis was performed for the optimal situation with PC19.Results: Of the 115 patients, 110 underwent EUS-FNA and five were excluded. EUS-FNA was performed from the esophagus in four, stomach in 80, or duodenum in 26. The final diagnosis was malignancy in 100 and benign in 10. The feasibility was 98.2 and 97.3% with PC19 and EC19, respectively (p = 1.00). The rate of presence of a histological core and the histological, cytological, and overall diagnostic accuracies for PC19 versus EC19 were 84.6 versus 80.9% (p = 0.593), 83.6 versus 73.6% (p = 0.099), 63.6 versus 56.4% (p = 0.335), and 90.0 versus 79.1% (p = 0.039), respectively. PC19 was favored in the trans-esophageal/gastric approaches to obtain a histological diagnosis (p = 0.013). Adverse events were observed in four patients.Conclusion: Single-pass EUS-FNA with PC19 was feasible and showed significantly higher overall diagnostic accuracy and an increased tendency towards histological diagnostic accuracy, especially with trans-esophageal/gastric FNA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Japan and Europe, a retrieval basket is generally used for endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones, while in the US, a retrieval balloon is mainly used. However, the efficacies of these two devices have not been previously compared. Therefore, the present multicenter, prospective, randomized study was performed to compare the efficacies of these two devices for endoscopic biliary stone extraction.Methods: This study was designed as a non-inferiority study in comparing a basket removal with a balloon removal. Six Japanese institutions participated in this study, which included 184 patients with bile duct stones <11 mm in diameter with no limitation in the number of stones. The stones were identified and measured during ERCP, after which the patients were randomly assigned to undergo endoscopic stone extraction using either a basket catheter or a balloon catheter. The primary end point was the rate of complete removals of stones within 10 min, and the secondary end point was the rate of procedure-related complications.Results: There were 91 patients in the basket group and 93 in the balloon group. The rate of successful stone extraction within 10 min was 81.3 % (74/91) in the basket group and 83.9 % (78/93) in the balloon group (p = 0.7000). The complication rate was 6.6 % in the basket group and 11.8 % in the balloon group (p = 0.3092). Complications included bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis.Conclusions: Basket and balloon catheters showed similar efficacies for endoscopic biliary stone extraction when stone size is 11 mm or smaller. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) is safe and effective in management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) prior to EPLBD has been performed as a standard procedure. However, the significance of EST prior to EPLBD has not been well studied yet.Aims: To compare the clinical outcomes of EPLBD with and without EST to evaluate the significance of EST.Methods: Between April 2010 and March 2015, a total of 82 patients with naïve papillae underwent EPLBD with or without EST for the management of CBDS. A retrospective analysis compared the efficacy and safety of EPLBD with and without EST.Results: Basic patient characteristics were not significantly different between the groups that underwent EPLBD with EST (n = 27) and without EST (n = 55). Complete stone removal rates were similar between the groups (100 % in the EST group and 98 % in the non-EST group, p = 1.00). There was no significant difference in the median balloon size (13 mm in both groups, p = 0.445), rate of application of mechanical lithotripsy (26 vs. 35 % in the EST and non-EST groups, respectively, p = 0.463), or the median procedure time (38 vs. 34 min in the EST and non-EST groups, respectively, p = 0.682). The overall adverse event rates were not statistically different (4 vs. 7 % in the EST and non-EST groups, respectively, p = 1.00). Pancreatitis, cholangitis, and hemorrhage rates were also similar in both groups.Conclusions: EST prior to EPLBD may be unnecessary since this study did not demonstrate its benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), anticancer treatment is often administered. The impact of anticancer treatment on recurrent biliary obstruction in covered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) has not been fully elucidated. Methods: Data on 279 patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study of two different covered SEMS for distal MBO, WATCH study (141 partially covered WallFlex stents and 138 partially covered Wallstents) were retrospectively analyzed. The rates and causes of recurrent biliary obstruction (stent occlusion or migration) were compared between anticancer treatment group ( n = 173) and best supportive care alone (BSC) group ( n = 106). Cumulative time and prognostic factors for recurrent biliary obstruction were analyzed, using a proportional hazards model with death without recurrent biliary obstruction as a competing risk. Results: The overall rate (43 vs. 25 %, P = 0.002) and the cumulative incidence (16.1 vs. 8.2, 27.9 vs. 18.9 and 44.1 vs. 26.6 % at 3, 6 and 12 months, P = 0.030 by Gray’s test) of recurrent biliary obstruction were significantly higher in anticancer treatment group compared with BSC group. The multivariate analysis revealed anticancer treatment [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 1.93, P = 0.007) as well as the use of a partially covered WallFlex stent (SHR 0.65, P = 0.049) as prognostic factors. Conclusions: Anticancer treatment was a risk factor for recurrent biliary obstruction in covered SEMS for distal MBO. The superiority of a partially covered WallFlex stent was again confirmed in this competing risk analysis; UMIN-CTR: UMIN000002293. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is widely performed in patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, the long-term outcomes of patients following ES have not been sufficiently elucidated. Impaired papillary function following ES may result in additional late complications. In contrast, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD)-another option for treating CBDS-is expected to preserve papillary function. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with CBDS treated with ES to those treated with EPBD in a large cohort. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed, according to gallbladder (GB) status. Methods: A cohort study was performed using propensity score matching to reduce treatment selection bias. This involved the analysis of follow-up data for 1086 patients who underwent EPBD or ES for CBDS. Results: Propensity score matching extracted 246 pairs of patients. The median (interquartile range) follow-up period after EPBD or ES was 93.5 (46.8-129.2) months and 90 (42-139.3) months, respectively. The incidence of CBDS recurrence after EPBD and ES were 8.5 and 15.0 %, respectively. The hazard ratio (95 % CI) was 0.577 (0.338-0.986) ( P = 0.044). Based on the status of the GB, the incidence of CBDS recurrence was significantly different between post-EPBD and post-ES in the group with cholecystectomy after EPBD/ES ( P = 0.013). Conclusions: The incidence of biliary complications was significantly lower in patients after EPBD than in those after ES, and this outcome appeared most markedly in patients who also underwent cholecystectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy is challenging. Several endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary access techniques have been reported as effective alternatives. EUS-guided antegrade treatments (AG) have been developed more recently but have not yet been studied well. Aims: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of EUS-AG for biliary disorders in patients with surgically altered anatomies. Methods: We retrospectively identified all the patients who underwent EUS-AG. The left intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD) was initially punctured from the intestine followed by cholangiography, antegrade guidewire manipulation, and bougie dilation of the fistula. Either antegrade biliary stenting (ABS) or antegrade balloon dilation (ABD) was performed depending on the biliary disorders. In stone cases, the stones were antegradely pushed out using a balloon. After ABD, a nasobiliary drainage tube was placed to prevent possible bile leak and to keep an access route for any possible repeat procedures. Results: EUS-AG was attempted in seven patients including choledocholithiasis in five, malignant biliary obstruction in one, and bilioenteric anastomosis stricture in one. EUS-AG was not performed in one patient because EUS-cholangiography did not indicate the presence of stones. In the remaining six patients, the IHBD was successfully punctured, followed by cholangiography, guidewire insertion, and bougie dilation. ABS and ABD were successfully performed in one and five patients, respectively. Antegrade procedures with ABD were repeated twice in one patient. Mild complications were observed in two patients. Conclusions: EUS-AG for biliary disorders in patients with surgically altered anatomy is feasible. Further studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In order to confirm the impact of adding S-1 to gemcitabine, we conducted a randomized phase II study to compare the combination therapy of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Methods: Sixty-two patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer were randomized to either the combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m on days 1 and 15 and S-1 40 mg/m b.i.d. on days 1-14, repeated every 4 weeks) or gemcitabine monotherapy (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint of this study was response rate, and the regimen which showed the better response rate was selected as a candidate of phase III study. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria version 1.0. Results: The response rates of the combination therapy and the monotherapy were 20.0 and 9.4 %, respectively. The median time-to-progressions and overall survivals of these two treatments were nearly the same (5.6 vs. 4.3 months; 8.9 vs. 9.2 months). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the combination arm. Conclusions: The combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 showed the better response rate, but the superiority of this combination therapy was not clear in total. Because the standard of care changed to the combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin during this study, it is difficult to select this combination therapy with a 4-week regimen as a candidate of phase III study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy are widely used for the pathological diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures (MBS). However, the sensitivity of these methods remains insufficient, and it can be difficult to confirm the diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and the impact of this technique on clinical management in patients with suspected MBS where endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy yielded negative results. Methods: This study included 225 consecutive patients with suspected MBS, who underwent endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy at our institutions. Negative results were obtained for these pathological tests in 75 patients, and EUS-FNA was performed in 22 of these patients. We retrospectively compared the EUS-FNA results with the final diagnosis and examined the influence of the EUS-FNA diagnosis on treatment selection. Results: FNA specimens were successfully obtained in all patients, and the pathological results confirmed malignancy in 16 cases and predicted that the other 6 cases were benign. Of the 6 cases that were suspected to be benign, 3 patients were diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis by surgical pathology, and the remaining 3 patients were diagnosed with benign diseases at a follow-up after 12-18 months. Thus, the EUS-FNA-based diagnosis was proven correct for all the patients. In addition, the treatment strategy was altered as a result of the EUS-FNA results in the above 6 patients (27%). Conclusions: EUS-FNA is a sensitive and safe diagnostic modality for patients with suspected MBS and can be an additional option in cases where endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy have produced negative results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnosis of lymphadenopathy after treatment of malignancy is sometimes difficult, especially in patients whose treatment was deemed curative and without local recurrence or those who have increased serum levels of related tumor markers. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) as a diagnostic tool in patients with lymphadenopathy after curative treatment of malignancy. Consecutive patients with mediastinal, intraabdominal, or pelvic lymphadenopathy after curative treatment of malignancy who were referred to our hospital between October 2003 and September 2007 were enrolled in this study. A total of 62 patients were included. The lymph nodes were located at the mediastinum in 22 patients, intraabdomen in 38 patients, and intrapelvis in 2 patients. From the pathological findings of the FNA sample, 31 patients (50%) were confirmed to have recurrence of the prior malignancy, and 9 patients (15%) were diagnosed as having a different new malignancy. The remaining 22 patients (35%) were shown to have no recurrence or no other malignancies. However, 1 of them was later diagnosed with recurrence by open laparotomy. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of the EUS-FNA were 97%, 100%, 98%, 100%, and 97%, respectively. Lymphadenopathy after treatment of malignancy is not a definitive sign of recurrence. Therefore, pathological sampling and diagnosis are essential for determining the appropriate treatment. For this purpose, EUS-FNA is a safe, convenient, and minimally invasive procedure with high diagnostic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]