Search

Gastric emptying is a major determinant of postprandial blood glucose, accounting for ~35% of variance in peak glucose in both healthy individuals and those with type 2 diabetes. Gastric emptying is frequently disordered in individuals with diabetes (both abnormally delayed and accelerated). Delayed gastric emptying, i.e. diabetic gastroparesis, may be linked to upper gastrointestinal symptoms for which current treatment remains suboptimal; pharmacological acceleration of delayed emptying is only weakly associated with symptom improvement. Accordingly, the relationship between symptoms and delayed gastric emptying is not simply 'cause and effect'. In insulin-treated patients, disordered gastric emptying, even when not associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, can cause a mismatch between the onset of insulin action and the availability of absorbed carbohydrate, leading to suboptimal glycaemic control. In patients with type 2 diabetes, interventions that slow gastric emptying, e.g. glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, reduce postprandial blood glucose. This review focuses on recent insights into the impact of gastric emptying on postprandial blood glucose, effects of diabetes therapy on gastric emptying and the management of disordered gastric emptying in diabetes. In view of the broad relevance of gastric emptying to diabetes management, it is important that future clinical trials evaluating novel therapies that may affect gastric emptying should quantify the latter with an appropriate technique, such as scintigraphy or a stable isotope breath test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: It is uncertain whether lixisenatide has postprandial insulinotropic effects when its effect on slowing gastric emptying is considered, in healthy subjects and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the effects of single administration of 10 μg sc lixisenatide on glycaemia, insulin secretion and gastric emptying (GE), measured using the 'gold standard' technique of scintigraphy following an oral glucose load (75 g glucose). Methods: Fifteen healthy subjects (nine men, six women; age 67.2 ± 2.3 years) and 15 patients with T2DM (nine men, six women; age 61.9 ± 2.3 years) had measurements of GE, plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide for 180 min after a radiolabeled 75 g glucose drink on two separate days. All subjects received lixisenatide (10 μg sc) or placebo in a randomised, double-blind, crossover fashion 30 min before the drink. Insulin secretory response (ISR) was determined using the C-peptide deconvolution method. Results: GE was markedly slowed by lixisenatide compared with placebo in both healthy subjects (1.45 ± 0.10 kcal/min for placebo vs. 0.60 ± 0.14 kcal/min for lixisenatide) and diabetes (1.57 ± 0.06 kcal/min for placebo vs. 0.75 ± 0.13 kcal/min for lixisenatide) (both P < 0.001) with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.42). There was a moderate to strong inverse correlation between the early insulin secretory response calculated at 60 min and gastric retention at 60 min with lixisenatide treatment in healthy subjects (r = − 0.8, P = 0.0003) and a trend in type 2 diabetes (r = − 0.4, P = NS), compared with no relationships in the placebo arms (r = − 0.02, P = NS, healthy subjects) and (r = − 0.16, P = NS, type 2 diabetes). Conclusion: The marked slowing of GE of glucose induced by lixisenatide is associated with attenuation in the rise of postprandial glucose in both healthy subjects and diabetes and early insulin secretory response in healthy subjects. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02308254. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is released primarily from the proximal small intestine and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) from the more distal small intestine and colon. Their relative importance to the incretin effect in health has been contentious in the past, although it now appears that GIP has the dominant role. It is uncertain whether there is a relationship between GIP and GLP-1 secretion. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between plasma GIP and GLP-1 responses to a 75-g oral glucose load in individuals with normal (NGT) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Methods: One hundred healthy subjects had measurements of blood glucose, serum insulin, plasma GIP and GLP-1 concentrations for 240 min after a 300 mL drink containing 75 g glucose. Results: Fifty had NGT and 41 IGT; 9 had type 2 diabetes and were excluded from analysis. In both groups, there were increases in plasma GIP and GLP-1 following the glucose drink, with no difference in the magnitude of the responses between t = 0–240 min. There was a weak relationship between the iAUC0–240 min for GIP and GLP-1 in the combined (r = 0.23, P = 0.015) and in the IGT (r = 0.34, P = 0.01), but not in the NGT (r = 0.15, P = 0.14) group. Conclusions: There is a weak relationship between oral glucose-induced GIP and GLP-1 secretions in non-diabetic subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Of Review: Gastroparesis is an important complication of diabetes that may have a major impact on the quality of life as a result of upper gastrointestinal symptoms and impaired glycaemic control. Current management strategies include optimising blood glucose control, dietary modifications and supportive nutrition. Pharmacologic approaches with drugs that have prokinetic and/or antiemetic effects are also used widely; however, current available treatments have major limitations. There is increasing recognition that the rate of gastric emptying (GE) is a key determinant of the glycaemic response to a meal.Recent Findings: There is ongoing uncertainty regarding the impact of longstanding hyperglycaemia on GE, which requires clarification. New diagnostic techniques have been developed to better characterise the mechanisms underlying gastroparesis in individual patients, and these have the potential to lead to more personalised therapy. Management of gastroparesis is complex and suboptimal; novel approaches are desirable. This review summarises recent advances in the understanding of diabetic gastroparesis, with an emphasis on the current therapies that influence GE, and the bidirectional relationship between glycaemic control and GE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of reactive hypoglycaemia having breakthrough followed by intraduodenal glucose infusion in case of a type 2 diabetes patient. The article also includes the established result of reactive hypoglycaemia may lead to type 2 diabetes whereas postprandial reactive hypoglycaemia is rare in type 2 diabetes.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article related to ethnic disparities in glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and insulin responses to intraduodenal glucose in health.