Search

Purpose: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is pivotal for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients, significantly enhancing survival rates. Yet, adherence to AET remains challenging due to side effects. This study delves into the lived experience of breast cancer survivors concerning AET-induced side effects and examines differences in symptom profiles between Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Methods: We interviewed 35 breast cancer survivors on AET, conducting qualitative iterative analysis using grounded theory. A codebook was developed to aid data coding and interpretation. NVIVO software facilitated comprehensive transcript analysis. Results: Survivors reported a spectrum of side effects like hot flashes, sexual issues, joint pain, stiffness, mood swings, and fertility concerns. Symptom profiles differed based on AET type. Tamoxifen users experienced more frequent sexual side effects and mood swings, while AIs were linked to joint pain, stiffness, and bone health worries. Those on AET for over 6 months expressed heightened concerns about side effects. Conclusion: Tailored patient education, aligned with AET type, empowers survivors to manage side effects using self-regulatory strategies. Acknowledging distinct symptom profiles enables informed decisions, improving adherence and quality of life. Implications: This study underscores tailored survivorship support, equipping patients with tools to manage side effects, enhancing adherence, and long-term outcomes. The findings inform the integration of comprehensive survivorship programs, emphasizing individualized strategies for managing side effects and promoting better adherence and improved quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Discordance between HER2 expression in tumor tissue (tHER2) and HER2 status on circulating tumor cells (cHER2) has been reported. It remains largely underexplored whether patients with tHER2−/cHER2+ can benefit from anti-HER2 targeted therapies. Methods: cHER2 status was determined in 105 advanced-stage patients with tHER2− breast tumors. Association between cHER2 status and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox models and survival differences were compared by Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Compared to the patients with low-risk cHER2 (cHER2+ < 2), those with high-risk cHER2 (cHER2+ ≥ 2) had shorter survival time and an increased risk for disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20–3.88, P = 0.010). Among the patients with high-risk cHER2, those who received anti-HER2 targeted therapies had improved PFS compared with those who did not (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10–0.92, P = 0.035). In comparison, anti-HER2 targeted therapy did not affect PFS among those with low-risk cHER2 (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36–1.38, P = 0.306). Similar results were obtained after adjusting covariates. A longitudinal analysis of 67 patients with cHER2 detected during follow-ups found that those whose cHER2 status changed from high-risk at baseline to low-risk at first follow-up exhibited a significantly improved survival compared to those whose cHER2 remained high-risk (median PFS: 11.7 weeks vs. 2.0 weeks, log-rank P = 0.001). Conclusion: In advanced-stage breast cancer patients with tHER2− tumors, cHER2 status has the potential to guide the use of anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with high-risk cHER2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]