Search

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease whose molecular mechanisms are activated several years before cognitive symptoms appear. Genotype-based prediction of the phenotype is thus a key challenge for the early diagnosis of AD. Machine learning techniques that have been proposed to address this challenge do not consider known biological interactions between the genes used as input features, thus neglecting important information about the disease mechanisms at play. To mitigate this, we first extracted AD subnetworks from several protein–protein interaction (PPI) databases and labeled these with genotype information (number of missense variants) to make them patient-specific. Next, we trained Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) on the patient-specific networks for phenotype prediction. We tested different PPI databases and compared the performance of the GNN models to baseline models using classical machine learning techniques, as well as randomized networks and input datasets. The overall results showed that GNNs could not outperform a baseline predictor only using the APOE gene, suggesting that missense variants are not sufficient to explain disease risk beyond the APOE status. Nevertheless, our results show that GNNs outperformed other machine learning techniques and that protein–protein interactions lead to superior results compared to randomized networks. These findings highlight that gene interactions are a valuable source of information in predicting disease status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Differential gene expression normalised to a single housekeeping (HK) is used to identify disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets. HK gene selection is often arbitrary, potentially introducing systematic error and discordant results. Here we examine these risks in a disease model of brain hypoxia. We first identified the eight most frequently used HK genes through a systematic review. However, we observe that in both ex-vivo and in vivo, their expression levels varied considerably between conditions. When applying these genes to normalise expression levels of the validated stroke target gene, inducible Nox4, we obtained opposing results. As an alternative tool for unbiased HK gene selection, software tools exist but are limited to individual datasets lacking genome-wide search capability and user-friendly interfaces. We, therefore, developed the HouseKeepR algorithm to rapidly analyse multiple gene expression datasets in a disease-specific manner and rank HK gene candidates according to stability in an unbiased manner. Using a panel of de novo top-ranked HK genes for brain hypoxia, but not single genes, Nox4 induction was consistently reproduced. Thus, differential gene expression analysis is best normalised against a HK gene panel selected in an unbiased manner. HouseKeepR is the first user-friendly, bias-free, and broadly applicable tool to automatically propose suitable HK genes in a tissue- and disease-dependent manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Various studies exist about the molecular mechanisms of viral infection. However, such information is spread across many publications and it is very time-consuming to integrate, and exploit. We develop CoVex, an interactive online platform for SARS-CoV-2 host interactome exploration and drug (target) identification. CoVex integrates virus-human protein interactions, human protein-protein interactions, and drug-target interactions. It allows visual exploration of the virus-host interactome and implements systems medicine algorithms for network-based prediction of drug candidates. Thus, CoVex is a resource to understand molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity and to prioritize candidate therapeutics. We investigate recent hypotheses on a systems biology level to explore mechanistic virus life cycle drivers, and to extract drug repurposing candidates. CoVex renders COVID-19 drug research systems-medicine-ready by giving the scientific community direct access to network medicine algorithms. It is available at https://exbio.wzw.tum.de/covex/. Information developed to understand the molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection for predicting drug repurposing candidates is time-consuming to integrate and explore. Here, the authors develop an interactive online platform for virus-host interactome exploration and drug (target) identification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plants are essential for life and are extremely diverse organisms with unique molecular capabilities1. Here we present a quantitative atlas of the transcriptomes, proteomes and phosphoproteomes of 30 tissues of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Our analysis provides initial answers to how many genes exist as proteins (more than 18,000), where they are expressed, in which approximate quantities (a dynamic range of more than six orders of magnitude) and to what extent they are phosphorylated (over 43,000 sites). We present examples of how the data may be used, such as to discover proteins that are translated from short open-reading frames, to uncover sequence motifs that are involved in the regulation of protein production, and to identify tissue-specific protein complexes or phosphorylation-mediated signalling events. Interactive access to this resource for the plant community is provided by the ProteomicsDB and ATHENA databases, which include powerful bioinformatics tools to explore and characterize Arabidopsis proteins, their modifications and interactions. A quantitative atlas of the transcriptomes, proteomes and phosphoproteomes of 30 tissues of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana provides a valuable resource for plant research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in adults being marked with a very poor prognosis. Therapy concept implies concomitant radio-chemotherapy and facultative implantation of carmustine-eluted wafer. Current literature suggests microRNA 26a expression in glioblastoma to interact with alkylating chemotherapy. Subsequently, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of miRNA-26a expression and carmustine wafer implantation and its potential usefulness as a predictive marker for therapy response. Methods: In total, 229 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were included into the final analysis. Of them, 80 cases were recruited from the Saarland University Medical Center for a retrospective matched-pair analysis stratified after therapy regime: One group (carmustine wafer group; n=40) received concomitant radio-chemotherapy with carmustine wafer implantation. The other group (control group; n=40) only received concomitant radio-chemotherapy. The results were confirmed by comparing them with an independent dataset of 149 patients from the TCGA database. All tumor specimens were evaluated for miRNA-26a expression, MGMT promoter methylation, and IDH1 R132H mutation status, and the results were correlated with the clinical data. Results: Twenty-three patients in the carmustine wafer group showed low expression of miRNA-26a, while 17 patients showed a high expression. In the control group, 28 patients showed low expression, while 12 patients showed a high expression. The patients with high miRNA-26a expression in the carmustine wafer group were characterized by a significantly longer overall (hazard ratio [HR] 2.750 [95% CI 1.352–5.593]; p=0.004) and progression-free survival (HR 3.091 [95% CI 1.436–6.657]; p=0.003) than patients with low miRNA-26a expression. The 17 patients in the carmustine wafer group with high miRNA-26a expression showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (p=0.013) and overall survival (p=0.007) compared with the control group. There were no such correlations identified within the control group. TCGA datasets supported these findings. Conclusions: MiRNA-26a expression turned out to be a promising predictor of therapy response and clinical outcome in glioblastoma patients treated with carmustine wafer implantation. For evaluation of the role of miRNA-26a in a combined therapy setting, further studies are needed in order to translate general findings to the patient's individual situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advance of new technologies in biomedical research has led to a dramatic growth in experimental throughput. Projects therefore steadily grow in size and involve a larger number of researchers. Spreadsheets traditionally used are thus no longer suitable for keeping track of the vast amounts of samples created and need to be replaced with state-of-the-art laboratory information management systems. Such systems have been developed in large numbers, but they are often limited to specific research domains and types of data. One domain so far neglected is the management of libraries of vector clones and genetically engineered cell lines. OpenLabFramework is a newly developed web-application for sample tracking, particularly laid out to fill this gap, but with an open architecture allowing it to be extended for other biological materials and functional data. Its sample tracking mechanism is fully customizable and aids productivity further through support for mobile devices and barcoded labels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

De novo pathway enrichment is a powerful approach to discover previously uncharacterized molecular mechanisms in addition to already known pathways. To achieve this, condition-specific functional modules are extracted from large interaction networks. Here, we give an overview of the state of the art and present the first framework for assessing the performance of existing methods. We identified 19 tools and selected seven representative candidates for a comparative analysis with more than 12,000 runs, spanning different biological networks, molecular profiles, and parameters. Our results show that none of the methods consistently outperforms the others. To mitigate this issue for biomedical researchers, we provide guidelines to choose the appropriate tool for a given dataset. Moreover, our framework is the first attempt for a quantitative evaluation of de novo methods, which will allow the bioinformatics community to objectively compare future tools against the state of the art. Computational biology: Evaluation of network-based pathway enrichment tools De novo pathway enrichment methods are essential to understand disease complexity. They can uncover disease-specific functional modules by integrating molecular interaction networks with expression profiles. However, how should researchers choose one method out of several? In this article, a group of scientists from Denmark and Germany presents the first attempt to quantitatively evaluate existing methods. This framework will help the biomedical community to find the appropriate tool(s) for their data. They created synthetic gold standards and simulated expression profiles to perform a systematic assessment of various tools. They observed that the choice of interaction network, parameter settings, preprocessing of expression data and statistical properties of the expression profiles influence the results to a large extent. The results reveal strengths and limitations of the individual methods and suggest using two or more tools to obtain comprehensive disease-modules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epigenetics studies inheritable and reversible modifications of DNA that allow cells to control gene expression throughout their development and in response to environmental conditions. In computational epigenomics, machine learning is applied to study various epigenetic mechanisms genome wide. Its aim is to expand our understanding of cell differentiation, that is their specialization, in health and disease. Thus far, most efforts focus on understanding the functional encoding of the genome and on unraveling cell-type heterogeneity. Here, we provide an overview of state-of-the-art computational methods and their underlying statistical concepts, which range from matrix factorization and regularized linear regression to deep learning methods. We further show how the rise of single-cell technology leads to new computational challenges and creates opportunities to further our understanding of epigenetic regulation., (© 2021. Springer Nature America, Inc. part of Springer Nature.)