Search

Purpose: Dysphagia prevalence in younger community dwelling adults and across nations is sparse. We investigated the prevalence of swallowing problems in an unselected cohort of people aged 18–65 years. Methods: The EAT-10 Assessment Tool was converted into an anonymized online survey. Invitations were e-mailed to author contacts and onwards dispersal encouraged. Analysis was performed using non-parametric test for group comparison (Mann–Whitney U) and Spearman's rho correlation. Results: From March 2014 to October 2017: 2054 responses (32 reported ages outside of 18–65 or undeclared) from Africa, Asia, Australasia/Oceania, Europe, and North and South America. Responses: 1,648 female, 364 male, (10 reported as both), median age 34, (range 18–65, mean 37.12, SD 12.40) years. Total EAT-10 scores: median 0 (range 0–36, mean 1.57, SD 3.49). EAT-10 score ≥ 3 (337) median 5 (range 3–36, mean 7.02 SD 5.91). Median age 36 (range 19–65, mean 37.81, SD 13.21) years. Declared sex was not statistically significantly associated with non-pathological vs. pathological EAT-10 score (p = 0.665). Female scores (median 0.00, mean 1.56, SD 3.338) were significantly higher than for males (median 0.00, mean 1.62, SD 4.161): U (Nfemale = 1648, Nmale = 364) = 275,420.000, z = − 2.677, p = 0.007. Age and EAT-10 score were not associated: females rs = − 0.043, p = 0.079, N = 1648, males rs = − 0.003, p = 0.952, N = 364. Considerable impact on people: "I take ages to eat a main course ... This is embarrassing and I often leave food even though I am still hungry." (no diagnosis, EAT-10 = 17). Conclusion: Concerns regarding swallowing exist in people undiagnosed with dysphagia, who may feel uncomfortable seeking professional help. Dysphagia may be under reported resulting in a hidden population. Subtle changes are currently seen as subtle markers of COVID-19. Further work is required to ensure that what is an essentially normal swallow does not become medicalized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Feeding difficulties are common in preterm infants. These may be associated with inadequate dietary intake, poor growth, and parental anxiety. Oral-motor dysfunction has been observed in preterm infants during sucking and the early stages of weaning but has not been rigorously studied in later infancy when eating a range of food consistencies. We aimed to establish if oral-motor dysfunction during feeding occurs in preterm infants in later infancy and to explore the relationships with specific neonatal risk factors: gestational age at birth, prolonged supplementary oxygen requirement, and delay in establishing full oral feeding. Infants born less than 37 weeks gestational age were evaluated once at 10 months corrected gestational age using a validated feeding assessment (Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment). Fifteen infants were enrolled (9 males, 6 females; median gestational age at birth = 33 weeks, range = 25–36 weeks; median birth weight = 1890 g, range = 710–2950 g). Oral-motor dysfunction was observed in three infants all born after 31 weeks gestation. No relationship was found with the neonatal risk factors. This study indicates that oral-motor dysfunction may occur in later infancy and is not easily predicted from specific neonatal risk factors. Further study is required to evaluate the true prevalence and the health implications of oral-motor dysfunction in this population in later infancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This original pilot study was conducted to explore and understand the factors that influence a patient’s decision-making when considering percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement for nonoral nutrition and hydration supplementation. Seven patients living with progressive dysphagic symptoms who had made a decision about percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement were interviewed and their responses analyzed using the constant comparison method. All participants felt they had no option other than to accept the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The impact of visible physical deterioration and medical opinion were the most powerful influences on patients’ decisions. Patients’ perception of their involvement in the decision varied. This was linked to the amount and timing of information supplied and support they felt they received. Few patients have prior knowledge of tube feeding and rely heavily on medical advice. Effective communication by healthcare professionals can promote an environment that is supportive of patients’ involvement in decisions. Adequate preparation time is vital if patients are to stop feeling uninvolved or peripheral to the decision-making process. Multidisciplinary teams need to address their working practices so that they do not intimidate patients, but rather empower patients in their decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There have been questions about the reliability of subjective rating scales used to assess valleculae residue from fluoroscopic images. The aim of this study was to assess interrater agreement on one such scale, and compare it with agreement using a new objective measurement scale. Five speech and language therapists rated 100 valleculae residue still images from 20 consecutive patients using standard clinical practice (i.e., subjective visual grading of the videofluoroscopy still and rating as none, mild, moderate, or severe). The images were rerated by the same clinicians using Picture Archiving Communication System measurement tools. The valleculae residue ratio relates the residue size to the size of an individual's valleculae. A valleculae residue ratio scale was devised using a linear classifier, which defines the cutoff between grades of valleculae residue (none, mild, moderate, and severe). The new method proved at least as reliable as the traditional method; for interrater reliability, kappa = 0.73 vs. 0.73; for intrarater reliability, kappa = 0.87 vs. 0.85. The valleculae residue ratio is proposed as a new quick reliable method of quantifying residue where the Picture Archiving Communication System is available. We now wish to test the impact of this method where poor inter- and intrarater reliability exists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There have been questions about the reliability of subjective rating scales used to assess valleculae residue from fluoroscopic images. The aim of this study was to assess interrater agreement on one such scale, and compare it with agreement using a new objective measurement scale. Five speech and language therapists rated 100 valleculae residue still images from 20 consecutive patients using standard clinical practice (i.e., subjective visual grading of the videofluoroscopy still and rating as none, mild, moderate, or severe). The images were rerated by the same clinicians using Picture Archiving Communication System measurement tools. The valleculae residue ratio relates the residue size to the size of an individual’s valleculae. A valleculae residue ratio scale was devised using a linear classifier, which defines the cutoff between grades of valleculae residue (none, mild, moderate, and severe). The new method proved at least as reliable as the traditional method; for interrater reliability, kappa = 0.73 vs. 0.73; for intrarater reliability, kappa = 0.87 vs. 0.85. The valleculae residue ratio is proposed as a new quick reliable method of quantifying residue where the Picture Archiving Communication System is available. We now wish to test the impact of this method where poor inter- and intrarater reliability exists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cervical auscultation is the use of a listening device, typically a stethoscope in clinical practice, to assess swallow sounds and by some definitions airway sounds. Judgments are then made on the normality or degree of impairment of the sounds. Listeners interpret the sounds and suggest what might be happening with the swallow or causing impairment. A major criticism of cervical auscultation is that there is no evidence on what causes the sounds or whether the sounds correspond to physiologically important, health-threatening events. We sought to determine in healthy volunteers (1) if a definitive set of swallow sounds could be identified, (2) the order in which swallow sounds and physiologic events occur, and (3) if swallow sounds could be matched to the observed physiologic events. Swallow sounds were computer recorded via a Littmann stethoscope from 19 healthy volunteers (8 males, 11 females, age range = 18–73 years) during simultaneous fiberoptic laryngoscopy and respiration monitoring. Six sound components could be distinguished but none of these occurred in all swallows. There was a wide spread and a large degree of overlap of the timings of swallow sounds and physiologic events. No individual sound component was consistently associated with a physiologic event, which is a clinically significant finding. Comparisons of groups of sounds and events suggest associations between the preclick and the onset of apnea; the preclick and the start of epiglottic excursion; the click and the epiglottis returning to rest; the click and the end of the swallow apnea. There is no evidence of a causal link. The absence of a swallow sound in itself is not a definite sign of pathologic swallowing, but a repeated abnormal pattern may indicate impairment. At present there is no robust evidence that cervical auscultation of swallow sounds should be adopted in routine clinical practice. There are no data to support the inclusion of the technique into clinical guidelines or management protocols. More evaluation using imaging methods such as videofluoroscopy is required before this subjective technique is validated for clinical use by those assessing swallowing outside of a research context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Health risks associated with dysphagia in adults with intellectual impairment are well documented. There is little research into compliance with dysphagia recommendations in environments where care is provided for adults with intellectual impairment. This is a pilot study into carer compliance with Speech-Language Pathology recommendations. We aimed to investigate the level of compliance with dysphagia recommendations in day centers and the factors that might affect compliance using a questionnaire. Twenty-seven clients were observed. Results showed an overall high level of compliance with recommendations (82%), with figures ranging from 64% compliance with appropriate utensils to 100% with direct support recommendations. Areas of noncompliance were evident, with level of dependence of clients and training of carers being key issues. Implications for practitioners are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the first study to examine dysphagia assessment practices of UK/Ireland speech and language therapists. The aims were to (1) examine practice patterns across clinicians, (2) determine levels of consistency in practice, and (3) compare practices of clinicians in the UK/Ireland with those previously reported of clinicians in the United States. A questionnaire, developed for earlier U.S. research, was adapted following a pilot study. The resulting email survey was completed by 296 speech and language therapists working with dysphagic adults. Respondents were asked to rate how frequently they use 31 components of a clinical dysphagia examination. Consistency was determined by calculating the percentage of respondents who agreed on frequency of use. Low frequency of use was reported for four components: trials with compensatory techniques, obtain patient’s drug history, assessment of speech articulation/intelligibility, and screening/assessment of mental abilities. Variability among clinicians was high, with inconsistency observed for 6/31 components (19%) and high consistency for only 10/31 (32%). Results were compared with data from the earlier U.S. study. Notable differences in practice were observed for five components: cervical auscultation, trials with compensatory techniques, gag reflex, assessment of sensory function, and screening/assessment of mental abilities. Inconsistency among UK/Ireland clinicians was higher than in the comparator U.S. study. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cervical auscultation is experiencing a renaissance as an adjunct to the clinical swallowing assessment. It is a controversial technique with a small evidence base. We have aimed to establish whether cervical auscultation interpretation is based on the actual sounds heard or, in practice, influenced by information gleaned from other aspects of the clinical assessment, medical notes, or previous knowledge. We sought to determine (a) rater reliability and its impact on the clinical value of cervical auscultation and (b) how judgments compare with the “gold standard”: videofluoroscopy. Swallow sounds were computer recorded via a Littmann stethoscope. Sounds were sampled from 10 healthy control swallows with no aspiration/penetration and 10 patient swallows with aspiration/penetration, all recorded during simultaneous videofluoroscopy. The system generated sound quality similar to “live” bedside listening, a feature rarely seen in cervical auscultation studies. The 20 sound clips were classified as “normal” or “abnormal” by 19 volunteer speech-language pathologists with experience in cervical auscultation. After at least four weeks, 11 of these judges rated the sounds rerandomized on a new CD. Intrarater reliability kappa ranged from -0.12 to 0.71. Individual reliability did not correlate with years of experience, practice pattern, or frequency of use. Interrater reliability kappa?=?0.17. Comparison with radiologically defined aspiration/penetration yielded 66% specificity, 62% sensitivity, and majority consensus gave 90% specificity, 80% sensitivity. There was a significant relationship between individual reliability and true positive rate (rs?=?0.623,p?=?0.040). The reliability of individual judges varied widely and thus, inevitably, agreement between judges was poor. Validity is dependent upon reliability: Improving the poor raters would improve the overall accuracy of this technique in predicting abnormality in swallowing. The group consensus correctly identified 17 of the 20 clips so we may speculate that the swallow sound contains audible cues that shouldin principlepermit reliable classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to examine respiration characteristics at rest in healthy volunteers and patients with poststroke dysphagia, using a simple notebook computer-based system. Eighteen patients (age range=51–82 years) with dysphagia poststroke and 50 healthy volunteers (age range=20–78 years) were recruited. The patient group had a wide range of stroke severity as assessed using the Scandinavian Stroke Score (SSS 6–51) and Barthel Index (BI 2–20). Length of breathing cycle, rate, and a measure of the variability of the cycle length were examined. The patient group had a shorter mean cycle length (2.93 s compared with 3.91 s, p < 0.01) and hence faster respiration rate (0.35 Hz compared with 0.26 Hz, p < 0.01). The control group showed greater variability in the cycle length (10.78% compared with 6.56%, p = 0.01). There was no correlation between the SSS and BI and resting respiration variables. This suggests that it is not stroke severity alone that affects breathing. The differences observed in resting respiratory rate suggest that respiratory monitoring as a useful adjunct to the clinical bedside assessment warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to examine swallow respiratory characteristics using a notebook computer system. A relatively simple system assessing easily identifiable features is more likely to be incorporated into everyday clinical practice. Eighteen patients (age range = 51–82 years) with dysphagia poststroke and 50 healthy volunteers (age range = 20–78 years) were recruited. The patient group was less likely to always breathe out postswallow on water (9/15 cf 46/49), and some did not breathe out immediately postswallow at all (3/15 cf 0/49, p < 0.01). The pattern was similar with yogurt. Multiple swallowing was identified in the patient group and surprisingly with a large number of the volunteers for all bolus types but was more common in the patient group (p < 0.01). This trait is usually attributed to impaired swallows; that it is prevalent in the normal population has implications for using it as a dysphagia marker in clinical assessments. Yogurt has intrinsic features that increase multiple swallowing and caution should be used when identifying an impairment based on multiple swallowing with such a test substance. In the control group there was a high correlation of swallow apnea on 5 mL of water compared with 20 mL of water (r = 0.759, p < 0.01) and 5 mL of yogurt (r = 0.871, p < 0.01), indicating a possible individual swallow respiration pattern. This was also evident in the patient group. No significant difference in length of swallow apnea was found between the two groups. No evidence was found to link swallow respiration characteristics with aspiration as identified on simultaneous videofluoroscopy. The patient group had a wide range of impairments which suggests that stroke severity is not the sole determinant of swallow respiratory changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Videofluoroscopy has become an increasingly important armament in the investigation and assessment of swallowing disorders. However, very little work has been published on the radiation dose used in such examinations and currently there is no national diagnostic reference level in the United Kingdom. Videofluoroscopy in our hospital is performed predominantly by one radiologist (IZM) in a single fluoroscopy room. We recorded the screening times of 230 patients over a 45-month period. Screening time ranged from 18 to 564 s (median = 171 s) associated with a median dose-area product of 1.4 Gy cm2. This is below the third quartile level of 2.7 Gy cm2 for all such examinations performed across the northern England. The effective dose associated with a typical videofluoroscopy dose-area product is 0.2 mSv. Videofluoroscopy is the most appropriate instrumental examination for assessing oropharyngeal swallow biomechanics and intervention strategies. This data set is based on the largest number of videofluoroscopy swallow studies published to date. Our results show that videofluoroscopy can be performed using minimal radiation doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]