Search

Introduction: The eradication of ventricular tachycardia (VT) isthmus sites constitutes the minimal procedural endpoint for VT ablation procedures. Contemporary high-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging, in combination with computer-assisted analysis and segmentation of CT data, facilitates targeted elimination of VT isthmi. In this context, inHEART offers digitally rendered three-dimensional (3D) cardiac models which allow preoperative planning for VT ablations in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. To date, almost no data have been collected to compare the outcomes of VT ablations utilizing inHEART with those of traditional ablation approaches. Methods: The presented data are derived from a retrospective analysis of n = 108 patients, with one cohort undergoing VT ablation aided by late-enhancement CT and subsequent analysis and segmentation by inHEART, while the other cohort received ablation through conventional methods like substrate mapping and activation mapping. The ablations were executed utilizing a 3D mapping system (Carto3), with the mapping generated via the CARTO® PENTARAY™ NAV catheter and subsequently merged with the inHEART model, if available. Results: Results showed more successful outcome of ablations for the inHEART group with lower VT recurrence (27% vs. 42%, p < 0.06). Subsequent analyses revealed that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathies appeared to derive a significant benefit from inHEART-assisted VT ablation procedures, with a higher rate of successful ablation (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that inHEART-guided ablation is associated with reduced VT recurrence compared to conventional procedures. This suggests that employing advanced imaging and computational modeling in VT ablation may be valuable for VT recurrences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly efficient and safe while reducing procedure and RF time in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The QDot™ catheter is a novel contact force ablation catheter that allows automated flow and power adjustments depending on the local tissue temperature to maintain a target temperature during 90 W/4 s lesions. We analysed intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety using the QDot-catheter in patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).Methods: We included n = 48 patients undergoing PVI with the QDot-catheter with a temperature-controlled HPSD ablation mode with 90 W/4 s (TC-HPSD). If focal reconnection occurred besides repeat ablation, the ablation mode was changed to 50 W/15 s (QMode). N = 23 patients underwent cerebral MRI to detect silent cerebral lesions.Results: Mean RF time was 8.1 ± 2.8 min, and procedure duration was 84.5 ± 30 min. The overall maximal measured catheter tip temperature was 52.0 °C ± 4.6 °C, mean overall applied current was 871 mA ± 44 mA and overall applied energy was 316 J ± 47 J. The mean local impedance drop was 12.1 ± 2.4 Ohms. During adenosine challenge, n = 14 (29%) patients showed dormant conduction. A total of n = 24 steam pops were detected in n = 18 patients (39.1%), while no pericardial tamponade occurred. No periprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred, while n = 4 patients (17.4%) showed silent cerebral lesion.Conclusions: TC-HPSD ablation with 90 W/4 s using the QDot-catheter led to a reduction of procedure and RF time, while no major complications occurred. Despite optimized temperature control and power adjustment, steam pops occurred in a rather high number of patients, while none of them leads to tamponade or to clinical or neurological deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Kardiologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Remote magnetic navigation systems are used for catheter navigation in cardiac electrophysiological ablation procedures. In this setting, ferromagnetic particles will be moved by changes in the magnetic field. It is unknown to what extent cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are affected by the magnetic field when using magnetic navigation, and whether these forces may exceed the limit of 5 N that is set forth by German and European norms for implanted electrodes. Methods: A total of 121 rhythm devices were examined in a magnetic field of 0.1 T using the NIOBE II Magnetic Navigation System (Stereotaxis, St. Louis, USA). Forces acting on the devices were measured with the force measurement tool Futek LRF 400 (Futek Advanced Sensor Technology Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). A standardized protocol of different movements of the magnetic field including all three dimensions was performed and maximal forces on the CIED were assessed. Results: Out of 121 devices, 78 different pacemakers (54 different model families from 11 manufacturers) and 43 different cardioverter-defibrillators (26 different model families from 6) were examined. The mean force that could be observed was 0.33 ± 0.13 N for pacemakers (range 0.16-1.12 N) and 1.05 ± 0.11 N for cardioverter-defibrillators (range 0.86-1.38 N) when exposed to the magnetic field. Conclusion: Exposure of pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to a magnetic field of 0.1 T does not result in a force exceeding the regulatory demanded 5 N that could damage the connected leads. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]