Search

Animals frequently engage in anti-predator behaviour, but the intensity and choice of behaviour is likely dependent on the environment. We used a common-garden experiment to test whether Allenby's gerbils (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi) from different sites in the Negev Desert show different responses to the same level of risk. We tested whether animals from less covered (more risky) environments cope with predation risk better by foraging longer and faster in open microhabitats. To do so, we captured individuals from three areas that differ in vegetation cover and then quantified food consumption and apprehension in a standard outdoor vivarium (an enclosure). This vivarium simulated a natural environment, with natural moonlight, artificial cover, and two live owls. Animals from less vegetated environments consumed more food but foraged slower and with more apprehension. We also found that some populations prefer to forage more in the first quarter of the lunar cycle than the third, and others prefer the opposite, despite these moon phases having equal luminosity. That suggests an evolutionary coordination game might be at play. Our results show anti-predator behaviour is diverse among populations and similar within, which may hint the existence of different ecotypes if further differences are found. Significance statement: In this study, we analysed whether anti-predator behaviour is consistent within populations, and different among them. We found that gerbils have different anti-predator behaviour depending on their site of origin, and that difference continues even when placed in a common environment. Animals from environments poor in cover foraged slowly and more carefully but did so for a longer time. Interestingly, we also found that when animals from different locations are placed in the same environment together, the average behaviour of this mixed group is similar to the most cautious of the mix. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In heterogenous environments, predation risk from multiple predators and the availability of resources fluctuate both spatially and temporally. The various predators may include both aerial and terrestrial species that can facilitate each other and present qualitatively different risks to prey. Animals therefore forage across a complex landscape of fear, with areas of risks and relative safety where resources are generally asymmetrically distributed. Therefore, a trade-off exists between remaining safe and locating food. Animals make foraging decisions regarding where, when and for how long to forage by titrating marginal costs and benefits of foraging within and the marginal value of foraging across depletable resource patches. We conducted a series of titration experiments to determine how Allenby's gerbils (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi) titrated food and safety when presented with predation risk from owls, vipers and the joint risk from both predators. We manipulated bush and open microhabitats by increasing food availability in the riskier patches. In response to the different levels of enrichment, gerbils titrated food and safety. Riskier open microhabitats needed to be four times as rich in food as bush patches to be of equal value when subjected to predation from owls and the joint risk from owls and vipers. In response to vipers alone, riskier bush patches needed to be 2–4 times as rich in food as safer open patches for the marginal value of foraging to equalize across microhabitats. Overall, predation risk from owls and the joint risk from owls and vipers resulted in the greatest foraging costs for gerbils in risky microhabitats. Thus, the combined overall risk from multiple predator species was equivalent to the risk presented by the gerbils' most dangerous predator (owls alone). Significance statement: Animals trade-off remaining safe with locating food by titrating the marginal costs and benefits of foraging. We assessed how foragers titrate these costs and benefits through behavioural titration experiments. In our study, gerbils titrated food and safety in response to owls and vipers, aerial and terrestrial predators known to facilitate one another. Riskier patches needed to be 2–4 times as rich in food as safer patches to be of equal value to foraging gerbils. From the gerbils' perspective, owls are more formidable predators than vipers; despite the facilitation that occurs between these predators, the combination of the two predators had little effect on the titration beyond that of the owls alone. Behavioural titrations are important for quantifying differences in foraging costs between microhabitats and in response to multiple predators with different hunting strategies. As single-predator systems are relatively rare, titration experiments provide the opportunity to gain insights into the foraging/safety trade-offs made by animals in response to multiple predators on the landscape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the presence of a predator, foraging is a dangerous task. Social individuals can respond to risk by forming groups, benefiting from enhanced collective anti-predator behavior but suffering from increased conspicuousness to predators. Within groups, individuals exhibit variable foraging behavior. One important factor influencing risky foraging behaviour is current energetic state, and individuals must trade off food and safety by deciding when to leave a protected refuge in order to find food. We generated mixed groups of goldfish (Carassius auratus) containing equal numbers of underfed and well-fed individuals and examined individual refuge use and willingness to take risks venturing into risky foraging areas in the presence of an avian predator (little egret—Egretta garzetta). Underfed fish exhibited higher levels of risky behaviour by participating in more foraging outings and emerging from the refuge in frontal group positions, compared with well-fed individuals. As expected, underfed fish benefitted by consuming more food, but surprisingly did not experience higher rates of mortality. This may be due to the fact that the egret predator rarely captured the first fish to emerge from the refuge, preferentially attacked groups of three or more fish, and often captured fish in the chaotic period following a failed initial strike. We demonstrate how differences in energetic condition can influence risk-taking behaviours among social individuals that subsequently influence relative levels of foraging success and group fission–fusion dynamics. Moreover, our results illustrate the risk associated with foraging in larger groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To understand whether a parasite can exploit a novel invasive host species, we measured reproductive performance (number of eggs per female per day, egg size, development rate and size of new imagoes) of fleas from the Negev desert in Israel (two host generalists, Synosternus cleopatrae and Xenopsylla ramesis, and a host specialist, Parapulex chephrenis) when they exploited either a local murid host (Gerbillus andersoni, Meriones crassus and Acomys cahirinus) or two alien hosts (North American heteromyids, Chaetodipus penicillatus and Dipodomys merriami). We asked whether (1) reproductive performance of a flea differs between an alien and a characteristic hosts and (2) this difference is greater in a host specialist than in host generalists. The three fleas performed poorly on alien hosts as compared to local hosts, but the pattern of performance differed both among fleas and within fleas between alien hosts. The response to alien hosts did not depend on the degree of host specificity of a flea. We conclude that successful parasite colonisation of an invasive host is determined by some physiological, immunological and/or behavioural compatibility between a host and a parasite. This compatibility is unique for each host-parasite association, so that the success of a parasite to colonise an invasive host is unpredictable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Predator–prey studies often assume a three trophic level system where predators forage free from any risk of predation. Since meso-predators themselves are also prospective prey, they too need to trade-off between food and safety. We applied foraging theory to study patch use and habitat selection by a meso-predator, the red fox. We present evidence that foxes use a quitting harvest rate rule when deciding whether or not to abandon a foraging patch, and experience diminishing returns when foraging from a depletable food patch. Furthermore, our data suggest that patch use decisions of red foxes are influenced not just by the availability of food, but also by their perceived risk of predation. Fox behavior was affected by moonlight, with foxes depleting food resources more thoroughly (lower giving-up density) on darker nights compared to moonlit nights. Foxes reduced risk from hyenas by being more active where and when hyena activity was low. While hyenas were least active during moon, and most active during full moon nights, the reverse was true for foxes. Foxes showed twice as much activity during new moon compared to full moon nights, suggesting different costs of predation. Interestingly, resources in patches with cues of another predator (scat of wolf) were depleted to significantly lower levels compared to patches without. Our results emphasize the need for considering risk of predation for intermediate predators, and also shows how patch use theory and experimental food patches can be used for a predator. Taken together, these results may help us better understand trophic interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined gender-dependent competitive interactions between two nocturnal desert gerbil species,Gerbillus andersoni allenbyiandG. pyramidum, by a field manipulation experiment. The study was done in two 1-ha enclosed plots and included allopatric (onlyG. a. allenbyi) and sympatric (both species together) treatments. Seed trays and thermal imaging cameras were used to observe the gerbils’ foraging activities and aggressive interactions. We found that the negative effect of the competitively dominant species,G. pyramidum, on time spent in seed trays, and ability to control these artificial food patches, was stronger on male than on femaleG. a. allenbyi. Consequently, the aggression of maleG. a. allenbyitowards femaleG. a. allenbyiwas markedly reduced, indicating that the dominant species mediated competition between the genders of the subordinate species. Furthermore, this interference-mediated indirect effect was associated with a decrease in the body mass of maleG. a. allenbyiand an increase in the survival of femaleG. a. allenbyi. We suggest that both the reduction in intra-specific aggression and the positive effect on female survival can potentially stabilize competitive interactions and promote coexistence in this small mammal community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Certain individuals tend to occupy frontal positions within social groups. Less is known about how predation risk can affect individual spatial positioning and group fidelity. We tracked individuals within groups goldfish (Carassius auratus) as they left a safe, covered, microhabitat to enter a risky, open-water, microhabitat over 2 days: one with and one without an avian predator (little egret—Egretta garzetta) present. For each day, an outing index was calculated to take into account both individual order of emergence from the refuge and the proportion of outings participated in. Prior to the experiment, fish were individually marked for identification, measured, and tested for boldness to enter a novel area. Body size did not predict individual outing index scores on either control or experimental days. Boldness index scores influenced outing index scores only on days with an egret present. We found individual outing index scores to be relatively consistent across both days, regardless of the presence of a predator. However, the presence of a predator increased the mean outing index score of the highest ranked fish and decreased the number of fish that occupied lead positions, suggesting that risk amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Furthermore, the presence of the predator decreased individual willingness to leave the safety of cover. Thus, we show that the introduction of a predator influenced social group movement and that the boldest individuals emerge at the front of the group under risk.Significance statement: Within social species, some bold individuals tend to occupy positions at the front of the group. Groups of goldfish were provided a safe covered refuge, and we recorded the order in which individuals left the refuge to enter an open water environment over multiple outings. We examined fish behaviour over 2 days: with and without a predator present. We found that the predator decreased the probability the fish would leave the safe refuge; however, relative individual fish behaviour and positioning were consistent over the 2 days. Interestingly, the presence of the predator amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Our results demonstrate that predation risk can influence group and individual prey behaviour and illustrate that bold individuals emerge at the front of groups when risk is high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]