Search

Background: Safety and effectiveness of daclatasvir (DCV)/asunaprevir (ASV) dual therapy were demonstrated in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype (GT) 1b in phase III studies. This postmarketing surveillance (PMS) was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of DCV/ASV in Japanese patients with GT-1 CHC treated in routine clinical practice.Methods: This PMS was conducted between September 2014 and February 2017 at 261 centers in Japan. Patients with GT-1 CHC with or without compensated cirrhosis starting DCV and ASV dual therapy were observed from treatment initiation until 24 weeks after completing treatment. Safety and effectiveness assessments included incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and sustained viral response (SVR) rates at 24 weeks (SVR24).Results: Of 2820 patients (median age, 71.0 years; ≥ 65 years, 73.1%; female, 56.1%; with compensated cirrhosis, 39.1%) in the safety population, 726 (25.7%) experienced 1063 ADRs and 47 (1.7%) experienced 55 serious ADRs. Overall, 532 hepatic ADRs were reported; most hepatic ADRs occurred between > 4 and ≤ 12 weeks after treatment initiation. Subgroup analysis showed a higher incidence of ADRs in female, elderly, underweight, and renal function-impaired patients. SVR24 and SVR at 12 weeks (SVR12) were 87.3% (2216/2538) and 88.4% (2284/2584), respectively. Patients without (SVR12, 89.1%; SVR24, 87.9%) and with (SVR12, 87.3%; SVR24, 86.3%) compensated cirrhosis had similar SVR rates.Conclusion: Results from this large PMS indicate that DCV and ASV dual therapy is generally well tolerated and effective in routine clinical practice in Japanese patients with GT-1 CHC with or without compensated cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For the purpose of nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial respiratory pathogens from patients in Japan, the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy (JSC) started a survey in 2006. From 2009, JSC continued the survey in collaboration with the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases and the Japanese Society for Clinical Microbiology. The fourth-year survey was conducted during the period from January and April 2009 by the three societies. A total of 684 strains were collected from clinical specimens obtained from well-diagnosed adult patients with respiratory tract infections. Susceptibility testing was evaluable with 635 strains (130 Staphylococcus aureus, 127 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 4 Streptococcus pyogenes, 123 Haemophilus influenzae, 70 Moraxella catarrhalis, 78 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 103 Pseudomonas aeruginosa). A maximum of 45 antibacterial agents including 26 β-lactams (four penicillins, three penicillins in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors, four oral cephems, eight parenteral cephems, one monobactam, five carbapenems, and one penem), four aminoglycosides, four macrolides (including ketolide), one lincosamide, one tetracycline, two glycopeptides, six fluoroquinolones, and one oxazolidinone were used for the study. Analysis was conducted at the central reference laboratory according to the method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Incidence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was as high as 58.5 %, and that of penicillin-intermediate and penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PISP and PRSP) was 6.3 % and 0.0 %, respectively. Among H. influenzae, 21.1 % of them were found to be β-lactamase-non-producing ampicillin (ABPC)-intermediately resistant (BLNAI), 18.7 % to be β-lactamase-non-producing ABPC-resistant (BLNAR), and 5.7 % to be β-lactamase-producing ABPC-resistant (BLPAR) strains. A high frequency (76.5 %) of β-lactamase-producing strains has been suspected in Moraxella catarrhalis isolates. Four (3.2 %) extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae were found among 126 strains. Four isolates (2.5 %) of P. aeruginosa were found to be metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains, including three (1.9 %) suspected multi-drug resistant strains showing resistance against imipenem, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin. Continuous national surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of respiratory pathogens is crucial to monitor changing patterns of susceptibility and to be able to update treatment recommendations on a regular basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]