1. Recruitment and retention of women in a large randomized control trial to reduce repeat preterm births: the Philadelphia Collaborative Preterm Prevention Project
- Author
-
James C. Coyne, Leny Mathew, Joan Rosen Bloch, Robert L. Goldenberg, Irma T. Elo, Erika Fitzpatrick Dennis, David Webb, Ian M. Bennett, Vijaya K. Hogan, and Jennifer F. Culhane
- Subjects
Gerontology ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Randomization ,Epidemiology ,Ethnic group ,Black People ,Eligibility Determination ,Health Informatics ,White People ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,Underserved Population ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Informed consent ,Risk Factors ,Intervention (counseling) ,Preventive Health Services ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cultural Competency ,Philadelphia ,lcsh:R5-920 ,030505 public health ,Informed Consent ,business.industry ,Patient Selection ,Hispanic or Latino ,Patient Acceptance of Health Care ,medicine.disease ,3. Good health ,Clinical trial ,Socioeconomic Factors ,Premature birth ,Family medicine ,Premature Birth ,Female ,0305 other medical science ,business ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Recruitment and retention of patients for randomized control trial (RCT) studies can provide formidable challenges, particularly with minority and underserved populations. Data are reported for the Philadelphia Collaborative Preterm Prevention Project (PCPPP), a large RCT targeting risk factors for repeat preterm births among women who previously delivered premature (< 35 weeks gestation) infants. Methods Design of the PCPPP incorporated strategies to maximize recruitment and retention. These included an advanced database system tracking follow-up status and assessment completion rates; cultural sensitivity training for staff; communication to the community and eligible women of the benefits of participation; financial incentives; assistance with transportation and supervised childcare services; and reminder calls for convenient, flexibly scheduled appointments. Analyses reported here: 1) compare recruitment projections to actual enrollment 2) explore recruitment bias; 3) validate the randomization process 4) document the extent to which contact was maintained and complete assessments achieved 5) determine if follow-up was conditioned upon socio-economic status, race/ethnicity, or other factors. Results Of eligible women approached, 1,126 (77.7%) agreed to participate fully. Of the 324 not agreeing, 118 (36.4%) completed a short survey. Consenting women were disproportionately from minority and low SES backgrounds: 71.5% consenting were African American, versus 38.8% not consenting. Consenting women were also more likely to report homelessness during their lifetime (14.6% vs. 0.87%) and to be unmarried at the time of delivery (81.6% versus 47.9%). First one-month postpartum assessment was completed for 83.5% (n = 472) of the intervention group (n = 565) and 76% (426) of the control group. Higher assessment completion rates were observed for the intervention group throughout the follow-up. Second, third, fourth and fifth postpartum assessments were 67.6% vs. 57.5%, 60.0% vs. 48.9%, 54.2% vs. 46.3% and 47.3% vs. 40.8%, for the intervention and control group women, respectively. There were no differences in follow-up rates according to race/ethnicity, SES or other factors. Greater retention of the intervention group may reflect the highly-valued nature of the medical and behavior services constituting the intervention arms of the Project. Conclusion Findings challenge beliefs that low income and minority women are averse to enrolling and continuing in clinical trials or community studies.
- Full Text
- View/download PDF