Search

Copyright of Der Urologe A is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Unfallchirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cancer patients represent a vulnerable cohort during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic. Oncological societies have generated a plethora of recommendations, but precise instructions about routine oncological procedures remain scarce. Here, we report on local COVID-19 protection measures established in an interdisciplinary approach at a tertiary care center during the first wave of the pandemia in Germany. Following these measures, no additional morbidity or mortality during oncological procedures was observed, and no nosocomial infections were registered. However, Validation of our measures is outstanding and regional SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was low. However, specific oncological measures might be important to ensure optimal oncological results, especially for advanced cancer stages during this and future pandemia. In the future, communication about these measures might be crucial to a cancer patient´s assigned network to reduce the danger of excess mortality within the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Nephrologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Onkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of bone metastasis (BM) onset toward prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with sunitinib. Methods: mRCC patients with BM and sunitinib as first targeted therapy between May 2005 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with synchronous (s) BM or metachronous (m) BM were compared with regard to treatment and outcome [time to clinical progression (TTcP), overall survival (OS), skeletal-related events (SRE)]. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier estimation of TTcP and OS, Cox regression analyses, and a landmark analysis were administered. Results: BM was identified in 127 mRCC patients; thereof, 82 sunitinib-treated patients were analyzed [sBM n = 57 (69.5 %), mBM n = 25 (30.5 %)]. Higher tumor grading ( p = 0.029), male predominance ( p = 0.02), and less second-line therapy ( p = 0.001) were detected in sBM compared to mBM. SRE remained similar between subgroups ( p = 0.462). TTcP during sunitinib was similar [median sBM 8.1 (95 % CI 3.9-12.3) vs. mBM 8.7 (95 % CI 2.7-14.8) months, p = 0.903]. OS remained significantly inferior in sBM patients compared to mBM [median sBM 21.1 (95 % CI 16-26.2) months vs. mBM 38.5 (95 % CI 15-62) months, p = 0.001], which was confirmed by landmark analyses at 1.5, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. However, OS after occurrence of BM was similar in both groups [median sBM 24.2 (95 % CI 17.3-31.1) months vs. mBM 17.2 (95 % CI 8.4-26) months, p = 0.519]. Conclusions: mBM is associated with an improved OS compared to sBM in mRCC with sunitinib treatment, despite similar efficacy of sunitinib treatment in both groups of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The immunological checkpoints of programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD-L1) are currently in focus as novel therapeutic targets in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic association of PD-L1 expression in clear cell (cc) RCC with clinical parameters, tumor aggressiveness and overall survival (OS). Patients who underwent renal surgery due to RCC between 1994 and 2003 were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor specimens were analyzed for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry. One hundred and seventy-seven ccRCC patients were eligible for analysis, in which 140 (79.1 %) were negative and 37 (20.9 %) were positive for PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 positivity was associated with female gender ( p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis ( p = 0.004), distant metastasis ( p = 0.002), higher AJCC stage ( p = 0.004), as well as advanced disease (pT3/4 and/or N+ and/or M1) ( p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly diminished 5- and 10-year overall survival of 46.7 and 28.3 % for PD-L1 compared to PD-L1 tumors with 66 and 53.4 % ( p = 0.005), respectively. Univariate analysis showed a significant negative association of OS with PD-L1 positivity [ p = 0.005; HR: 2 (95 % CI 1.2-3.3)], even though PD-L1 positivity only tends to predict independently the OS using multivariate analyses [ p = 0.066; HR: 1.6 (95 % CI 0.98-2.7)]. PD-L1 expression in ccRCC is associated with parameters of aggressiveness, as well as with poor OS, even though PD-L1 status was not identified as a significant independent prognostic parameter. However, further studies in larger cohorts are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib induces partial remissions (PR) in a substantial proportion of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Only little is known about the activity of sunitinib in renal lesions in patients with metastatic disease, as most patients with synchronous metastases receive palliative nephrectomy. Methods: Fourteen patients with clear cell mRCC with renal lesions and sunitinib therapy (50 mg OD, 4/2 scheme) were retrieved retrospectively from clinic records. Tumor assessment consisted of CT scans at least every two cycles, analyzed according to RECIST. In 5 of 14 patients, renal tumors were considered as the primary tumor, while the remaining patients had kidney metastases. In total, 65 target lesions were evaluated. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) of sunitinib was 8.7 months (range: 2.7-40.2). Median overall survival (OS) from initiation of TKI therapy was 26 months (range: 3-55). Best response according to RECIST consisted of partial remission (PR) in 4 patients, stable disease (SD) in 7 patients, a complete remission (CR) in 1 patient, and 2 patients with progressive disease (PD). Analyzing the response of renal lesions only, 1 patient had PD, 8 patients had SD, 4 patients had PR, and 1 had a CR. Palliative nephrectomy was performed after two courses of sunitinib in 2 patients. Conclusions: In our cohort, similar responses of renal tumors and peripheral metastases were achieved with sunitinib treatment. Our results support the use of sunitinib to control renal tumor lesions in metastatic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Best Practice Onkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Onkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)