Search

The aim of this phase I/II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities of chronic oral etoposide given on days 1-10 followed by rescue with subcutaneous (s.c.) granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on days 12-19 as second-line chemotherapy in platinum-pretreated patients (pts) with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Cohorts of three to six pts were treated with doses of oral etoposide from 750?mg?m-2?cycle-1 escalated to 1250?mg?m-2?cycle-1 over 10 days, every 3 weeks. Subcutanous GM-CSF, 400?µg once daily, days 12-19, was added if dose-limiting granulocytopenia was encountered. In total, 18 pts with a median Karnofsky index of 80%(range, 70-100%) and a median time elapsed since the last platinum dose of 10 months (range, 1-24 months), 30%of whom showed visceral metastases, were treated at four dose levels (DLs) of oral etoposide on days 1-10 of each cycle as follows: DL 1, 750?mg?m-2?cycle-1, without GM-CSF, three pts; DL 2, 1000?mg?m-2?cycle-1, without GM-CSF, three pts; DL 3, 1000?mg?m-2?cycle-1, with GM-CSF, six pts; and DL 4, 1250?mg?m-2?cycle-1, with GM-CSF, six pts. All pts were assessable for toxicity and 16 pts for response. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at DL 4 by three of six pts, showing World Health Organization (WHO) toxicity grade 4. One patient died from gram-negative sepsis associated with granulocytopenia grade 4. Two more pts developed uncomplicated granulocytopenia grade 4. Thus, we recommend that DL 3 can be used for further phase II evaluation (i.e. oral etoposide 1000?mg?m-2?cycle-1, days 1-10, followed by s.c. GM-CSF 400?µg, days 12-19). The clinical complete or partial responses in each patient cohort were: DL 1, one of three pts; DL 2, one of three pts; DL 3, three of five pts; and DL 4, two of five pts. In conclusion, in this phase I/II study, we defined the MTD and the dose recommended for the therapy with oral etoposide given over 10 days followed by s.c. GM-CSF in platinum-pretreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Our data demonstrate encouraging activity of this regimen and strongly support its further investigation in a phase II study.British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92, 1019-1025. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602427 www.bjcancer.com Published online 8 March 2005 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The two hormone analogues octreotide and goserelin have been shown to decelerate growth of human pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of these two agents in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Octreotide was injected subcutaneously in dosages increasing weekly, starting with 50 μg twice daily, until the level of maintenance therapy of 500 μg three times a day was reached. In addition, 3.8 mg goserelin acetate was administered subcutaneously at monthly intervals. A median of 7 cycles (range 1–27 cycles) were applied; 13 out of 14 patients entered into the study were evaluable for response and all 14 were evaluated for toxicity. In one patient with initially non-resectable pancreatic cancer, systemic therapy yielded a partial remission lasting 9 months. The degree of tumour regression then allowed a consecutive macroscopic radical tumour resection followed by an additional 6 months of no evidence of disease while the same drug combination was continued. In an additional 9 patients, no change of disease was observed, in some cases for a remarkably long time (up to 27 months). Nevertheless, the objective response rate of 7% (95% confidence interval 0±21%) was low. In 5 patients a clear improvement in their performance status was seen soon after the start of therapy; 3 patients showed progression of the disease at first evaluation or earlier and 1 patient was not evaluable at the time of study assessment. According to the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier, the time to progression was 3.0±1.8 months [median±asymptotic standard error (ASE)] and overall survival was 6.0±1.5 months (median±ASE). Toxicity was rare and only of mild to moderate degree. Overall, the regimen under investigation did not meet the criteria for sufficient antitumoural effectiveness. Nevertheless, this study reinforces the concept that pancreatic cancer is principally responsive to endocrine therapy and therefore the further investigation of hormonal manipulation seems worth while in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary end point of this trial was to reduce neutropenic infections during the treatment of aggressive NHL with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, prednisolone ifosfamide, methotrexate, VP-16, and dexamethasone). Further, we studied the influence of filgrastim on dose intensity of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa, on the rate of complete remissions, on the time to relapse, and on survival. Eighty-five patients with untreated large-cell NHL were randomized to one of two treatment arms; 74 patients were eligible. Thirty-eight patients in arm 1 were treated with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy and filgrastim, 36 in arm 2 with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy alone. In arm 1 filgrastim was self-injected by the patients at 5 μg/kg body wt. s.c. daily, except on the days when cytotoxic drugs were given. During treatment we did weekly complete blood counts. Median leukocyte counts were 10.91×109/l and 5.46×109/l in arm 1 and 2, respectively ( p=10–6). Median neutrophil counts were 7.7×109/l in arm 1 and 2.72×109/l in arm 2 ( p<10–6). Median neutrophil nadirs were 0.199×109/l and 0.213×109/l in arm 1 and 2, respectively ( p=0.09). Mean platelet nadirs were 95 and 152×109/l ( p=0.000004) and mean hemoglobin nadirs 83.95 g/l and 92.78 g/l ( p=0.00558) in arm 1 and 2, respectively. Dose intensity of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa was 82.3% and 76.2% in arm 1 and 2, respectively ( p=0.041). Forty-two percent and 58% of patients experienced a febrile neutropenia in arm 1 and 2, respectively (not significant, NS). Median time to first neutropenic infection was in treatment week 11 and 6 in arm 1 and 2, respectively (NS). There was no significant difference in rate, duration, and kind of infection, duration of hospitalization, or antibiotic treatment. Seven toxic deaths occurred, all due to neutropenic infection, 6 and 1 in arm 1 and 2, respectively ( p=0.0732). Four of the six patients, who died of infection in arm 1 were older than 60 years. Complete remission rate was 83% and 66.7% in arm 1 and 2, respectively (NS). After a median observation time of 3 years there was no difference in time to relapse or survival. Filgrastim increases leukocyte and neutrophil counts and dose intensity, if used with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy in high-grade lymphomas. There was no significant effect on febrile neutropenia or infections. The more frequent fatal neutropenic infection rate in the filgrastim arm was not statistically significant. It is most appropriate to explain it by the patient's age in combination with the high dose intensity. The small increase in dose intensity had no effect on survival but probably decreased hemoglobin levels and platelet counts in arm 1. We were unable to show a benefit for filgrastim in combination with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary end point of this trial was to reduce neutropenic infections during the treatment of aggressive NHL with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, prednisolone ifosfamide, methotrexate, VP-16, and dexamethasone). Further, we studied the influence of filgrastim on dose intensity of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa, on the rate of complete remissions, on the time to relapse, and on survival. Eighty-five patients with untreated large-cell NHL were randomized to one of two treatment arms; 74 patients were eligible. Thirty-eight patients in arm 1 were treated with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy and filgrastim, 36 in arm 2 with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy alone. In arm 1 filgrastim was self-injected by the patients at 5 micrograms/kg body wt. s.c. daily, except on the days when cytotoxic drugs were given. During treatment we did weekly complete blood counts. Median leukocyte counts were 10.91 x 10(9)/l and 5.46 x 10(9)/l in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p = 10(-6)). Median neutrophil counts were 7.7 x 10(9)/l in arm 1 and 2.72 x 10(9)/l in arm 2 (p < 10(-6)). Median neutrophil nadirs were 0.199 x 10(9)/l and 0.213 x 10(9)/l in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.09). Mean platelet nadirs were 95 and 152 x 10(9)/l (p = 0.000004) and mean hemoglobin nadirs 83.95 g/l and 92.78 g/l (p = 0.00558) in arm 1 and 2, respectively. Dose intensity of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa was 82.3% and 76.2% in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.041). Forty-two percent and 58% of patients experienced a febrile neutropenia in arm 1 and 2, respectively (not significant, NS). Median time to first neutropenic infection was in treatment week 11 and 6 in arm 1 and 2, respectively (NS). There was no significant difference in rate, duration, and kind of infection, duration of hospitalization, or antibiotic treatment. Seven toxic deaths occurred, all due to neutropenic infection, 6 and 1 in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.0732). Four of the six patients, who died of infection in arm 1 were older than 60 years. Complete remission rate was 83% and 66.7% in arm 1 and 2, respectively (NS). After a median observation time of 3 years there was no difference in time to relapse or survival. Filgrastim increases leukocyte and neutrophil counts and dose intensity, if used with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy in high-grade lymphomas. There was no significant effect on febrile neutropenia or infections. The more frequent fatal neutropenic infection rate in the filgrastim arm was not statistically significant. It is most appropriate to explain it by the patient's age in combination with the high dose intensity. The small increase in dose intensity had no effect on survival but probably decreased hemoglobin levels and platelet counts in arm 1. We were unable to show a benefit for filgrastim in combination with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction to the article "Randomized Open Label Phase III Trial of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa Alternating Chemotherapy and Filgrastim Versus CEOP/IMVP-Dexa Alternating Chemotherapy for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). A multicenter trial by the Austrian Working Group For Medical Tumor Therapy" that was published in a 1997 issue is presented.