1. Thinking Animals or Thinking Brains?
- Author
-
Hershenov, David
- Subjects
- *
SIZE of brain , *BRAIN - Abstract
Animalism offers a more attractive account of the human person than the Embodied Mind Account. If people are not animals, but small proper parts of animals, then there is a threat of spatially coincident thinkers. This will likely have to be avoided at the cost of the sparsest of ontologies, one in which there are no larger entities that can become reduced to the size of the brain or cerebrum-size thinker. This will be a rather implausible ontology as such thinkers will not fit well into the natural world, meet traditional independence or unity criteria for being substances, nor provide a compositional principle with causal glue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF