Search

Background: The NOR-SWITCH main and extension trials demonstrated that switching from originator to biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) is efficacious and safe across six diseases. However, a subgroup analysis of Crohn's disease (CD) in the main trial displayed a close to significant difference favouring originator infliximab, and more scientific data have therefore been requested. Objective: The aim was to assess treatment efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in an explorative subgroup analysis in CD and ulcerative colitis (UC) in the NOR-SWITCH trials. Patients and Methods: The 52-week, randomised, non-inferiority, double-blind, multicentre, phase 4 NOR-SWITCH study was followed by a 26-week open extension trial where all patients received treatment with CT-P13. Treatment efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in CD and UC were assessed throughout the 78-week study period. Results: The main and extension trials included 155 and 93 patients with CD and 93 and 80 patients with UC, respectively. Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable in both treatment arms within patient groups. There were no differences in the main and extension trials regarding changes in activity indices, C-reactive protein, faecal calprotectin, patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures in CD and UC. Moreover, comparable results were also demonstrated for trough serum levels, presence of anti-drug antibodies, and reported adverse events. Conclusion: Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of both the originator and biosimilar infliximab were comparable in CD and UC in the NOR-SWITCH main and extension trials. These explorative subgroup analyses confirm that there are no significant concerns related to switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13 in CD and UC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02148640. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The influence of familial IBD on phenotype and course of disease in patients with CD and UC has not been studied in population-based cohorts. AIM: To compare phenotype and course of disease between IBD patients with a first-degree relative with IBD and sporadic cases in a population-based cohort followed prospectively for 5 yr. METHODS: Family history of IBD was registered at diagnosis and after 1 and 5 yr. Phenotype and course of disease were compared between sporadic and familial cases. RESULTS: Data for 200 patients with CD and 454 with UC were sufficient for analysis. A first-degree relative with IBD was registered in 14.5% of CD patients and 10.1% of UC patients. The concordance for type of disease was 82% and 70% for CD and UC, respectively. No differences between familial and sporadic cases as regards localization and behavior of disease in CD patients or disease extent in UC patients were observed. In CD patients with colonic involvement, those in the familial group were significantly younger at diagnosis than the sporadic cases. No difference in disease severity in CD patients was observed between the familial and sporadic groups. In UC patients relapse was more frequent in familial cases, but no difference was observed in the need for surgery or medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A family history of IBD does not seem to influence phenotype or to be an important prognostic factor for disease course in IBD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]