Search

The interplay between the immune system, coagulation, and endothelium is critical in regulating the host response to infection. However, in sepsis and other critical illnesses, a dysregulated immune response can lead to excessive alterations in these mechanisms, resulting in coagulopathy, endothelial dysfunction, and multi-organ dysfunction. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the pathophysiological mechanisms that govern the complex interplay between immune dysfunction, endothelial dysfunction, and coagulation in sepsis. It emphasises clinical significance, evaluation methods, and potential therapeutic interventions. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing effective treatments that can modulate the immune response, mitigate thrombosis, restore endothelial function, and ultimately improve patient survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mortality rate of sepsis remains high and further increases when complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Consequently, early detection and appropriate management of DIC will be helpful for the management of sepsis. Although overt DIC criteria are often used for diagnosing definitive DIC, it was not designed to detect early-phase DIC. The criteria and scoring system for sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) were developed and introduced in 2017 to detect early-stage DIC, and they were subsequently adopted by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis in 2019. The objective of detecting SIC was not to miss the patients at high risk of developing overt DIC at an earlier time. Although anticoagulant therapies are potential options for the treatment of sepsis-associated DIC, their effectiveness has not been established, and further research is warranted. For that purpose, an international collaborative platform is required for future clinical trials, and SIC criteria have been suggested for such studies. Calculating the SIC score is straightforward and suitable for use in clinical settings. This review aims to introduce SIC criteria and its scoring system for better management of sepsis-associated DIC. We also intended to update the current knowledge regarding this novel diagnostic criterion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Although largely used, the place of oxygen therapy and its devices in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) deserves to be clarified. The French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, SRLF) and the French Emergency Medicine Society (Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, SFMU) organized a consensus conference on oxygen therapy in ARF (excluding acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema and hypercapnic exacerbation of chronic obstructive diseases) in December 2023. Methods: A committee without any conflict of interest (CoI) with the subject defined 7 generic questions and drew up a list of sub questions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model. An independent work group reviewed the literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Fifteen experts in the field from both societies proposed their own answers in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 16 critical-care and emergency medicine physicians, nurses and physiotherapists without any CoI) and the public. The jury then met alone for 48 h to write its recommendations. Results: The jury provided 22 statements answering 11 questions: in patients with ARF (1) What are the criteria for initiating oxygen therapy? (2) What are the targets of oxygen saturation? (3) What is the role of blood gas analysis? (4) When should an arterial catheter be inserted? (5) Should standard oxygen therapy, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) be preferred? (6) What are the indications for non-invasive ventilation (NIV)? (7) What are the indications for invasive mechanical ventilation? (8) Should awake prone position be used? (9) What is the role of physiotherapy? (10) Which criteria necessarily lead to ICU admission? (11) Which oxygenation device should be preferred for patients for whom a do-not-intubate decision has been made? Conclusion: These recommendations should optimize the use of oxygen during ARF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The underrepresentation of women in leadership remains a pervasive issue, prompting a critical examination of support mechanisms within professional settings. Previous studies have identified challenges women face, ranging from limited visibility to barriers to career advancement. This survey aims to investigate perceptions regarding the effectiveness of women's leadership programs, mentoring initiatives, and a specialized communication course. Particularly it specifically targets addressing the challenges encountered by professional women. Methods: This multi-center, observational, international online survey was developed in partnership between ESICM NEXT and the ESICM Diversity and Inclusiveness Monitoring Group for Healthcare. Invitations to participate were distributed to both females and men through emails and social networks. Data were collected from April 1, 2023, through October 1, 2023. Results: Out of 354 respondents, 90 were men (25.42%) and 264 were women (74.58%). Among them, 251 completed the survey, shedding light on the persistent challenges faced by women in leadership roles, with 10%-50% of respondents holding such positions. Women's assertiveness is viewed differently, with 65% recognizing barriers such as harassment. Nearly half of the respondent's experience interruptions in meetings. Only 47.4% receiving conference invitations, with just over half accepting them. A mere 12% spoke at ESICM conferences in the last three years, receiving limited support from directors and colleagues, indicating varied obstacles for female professionals. Encouraging family participation, reducing fees, providing childcare, and offering economic support can enhance conference involvement. Despite 55% applying for ESICM positions, barriers like mobbing, harassment, lack of financial support, childcare, and language barriers were reported. Only 14% had access to paid family leave, while 32% benefited from subsidized childcare. Participation in the Effective Communication Course on Career Advancement Goals and engagement in women's leadership and mentoring programs could offer valuable insights and growth opportunities. Collaborating with Human Resources and leadership allies is crucial for overcoming barriers and promoting women's career growth. Conclusions: The urgency of addressing identified barriers to female leadership in intensive care medicine is underscored by the survey's comprehensive insights. A multifaceted and intersectional approach, considering sexism, structural barriers, and targeted strategies, is essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Maintaining tissue perfusion in sepsis depends on vascular integrity provided by the endothelial glycocalyx, the critical layer covering the luminal surface of blood vessels. The glycocalyx is composed of proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, and functional plasma proteins that are critical for antithrombogenicity, regulating tone, controlling permeability, and reducing endothelial interactions with leukocytes and platelets. Degradation of the glycocalyx in sepsis is substantial due to thromboinflammation, and treatments for sepsis and septic shock may exacerbate endotheliopathy via additional glycocalyx injury. As a result, therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving glycocalyx integrity should be considered, including modifications in fluid volume resuscitation, minimizing catecholamine use, controlling hyperglycemia, and potential use of corticosteroids and anticoagulants. In this review, we explore treatment strategies aligned with the recommendations outlined in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 with a special emphasis on evidence regarding glycocalyx protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunocompromised patients account for an increasing proportion of the typical intensive care unit (ICU) case-mix. Because of the increased availability of new drugs for cancer and auto-immune diseases, and improvement in the care of the most severely immunocompromised ICU patients (including those with hematologic malignancies), critically ill immunocompromised patients form a highly heterogeneous patient population. Furthermore, a large number of ICU patients with no apparent immunosuppression also harbor underlying conditions altering their immune response, or develop ICU-acquired immune deficiencies as a result of sepsis, trauma or major surgery. While infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised critically ill patients, little specific data are available on the incidence, microbiology, management and outcomes of ICU-acquired infections in this population. As a result, immunocompromised patients are usually excluded from trials and guidelines on the management of ICU-acquired infections. The most common ICU-acquired infections in immunocompromised patients are ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (which include ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitis) and bloodstream infections. Recently, several large observational studies have shed light on some of the epidemiological specificities of these infections—as well as on the dynamics of colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria—in these patients, and these will be discussed in this review. Immunocompromised patients are also at higher risk than non-immunocompromised hosts of fungal and viral infections, and the diagnostic and therapeutic management of these infections will be covered. Finally, we will suggest some important areas of future investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Haemorrhagic shock is frequent in critical care settings and responsible for a high mortality rate due to multiple organ dysfunction and coagulopathy. The management of critically ill patients with bleeding and shock is complex, and treatment of these patients must be rapid and definitive. The administration of large volumes of blood components leads to major physiological alterations which must be mitigated during and after bleeding. Early recognition of bleeding and coagulopathy, understanding the underlying pathophysiology related to specific disease states, and the development of individualised management protocols are important for optimal outcomes. This review describes the contemporary understanding of the pathophysiology of various types of coagulopathic bleeding; the diagnosis and management of critically ill bleeding patients, including major haemorrhage protocols and post-transfusion management; and finally highlights recent areas of opportunity to better understand optimal management strategies for managing bleeding in the intensive care unit (ICU). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A recent clinical trial conducted by Freund and colleagues investigated the impact of a 1-hour sepsis bundle in emergency departments for patients with suspected sepsis. The trial found that this intervention did not improve 28-day in-hospital mortality compared to standard care. The trial's design and execution were commendable, but it highlighted the challenges of designing future clinical trials in sepsis. The trial also raised questions about the feasibility of strict timeframes for intervention and the selection of appropriate endpoints. Overall, while the trial did not show significant improvement in outcomes, it provides valuable insights into the complexities of sepsis management and the need for a nuanced approach. [Extracted from the article]

This article discusses the importance of hemostasis testing in the intensive care unit (ICU) for critically ill patients who often experience bleeding and thrombotic complications. The article explores the utility of hemostasis testing in guiding clinical decisions and improving patient outcomes. It highlights the different coagulation abnormalities associated with underlying diseases such as sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. The article also emphasizes the significance of monitoring coagulation parameters during active bleeding and the use of anti-Xa monitoring in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Overall, the article suggests that a personalized approach to hemostasis testing can lead to more targeted and effective interventions, minimizing complications. [Extracted from the article]

Autoimmune diseases encompass a broad spectrum of disorders characterized by disturbed immunoregulation leading to the development of specific autoantibodies, resulting in inflammation and multiple organ involvement. A distinction should be made between connective tissue diseases (mainly systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic scleroderma, inflammatory muscle diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis) and vasculitides (mainly small-vessel vasculitis such as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and immune-complex mediated vasculitis). Admission of patients with autoimmune diseases to the intensive care unit (ICU) is often triggered by disease flare-ups, infections, and organ failure and is associated with high mortality rates. Management of these patients is complex, including prompt disease identification, immunosuppressive treatment initiation, and life-sustaining therapies, and requires multi-disciplinary involvement. Data about autoimmune diseases in the ICU are limited and there is a need for multicenter, international collaboration to improve patients' diagnosis, management, and outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the epidemiology, clinical features, and selected management of severe systemic autoimmune diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) worsens the prognosis of septic shock and contributes to multiple organ failure. To date, no data linking DIC and acute kidney injury (AKI) occurrence, severity, and evolution in this setting are available. We aimed at analyzing the association between AKI occurrence, severity and evolution in patients with septic shock-induced DIC. In a prospective monocentric cohort study, consecutive patients, 18 years and older, admitted in the ICU of Strasbourg University Hospital in the setting of systemic hypotension requiring vasopressor related to an infection, without history of terminal chronic kidney disease were eligible. AKI was defined according to the KDIGO classification. DIC diagnosis was based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) score. Evolution of AKI was evaluated through the composite endpoint of major adverse kidney events. Only patients with DIC that occurred before or at the time of AKI diagnosis were considered. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine factors associated with renal outcomes. Results: 350 patients were included, of whom 129 experienced DIC. Patients with DIC were more seriously ill (median SAPS II 64 vs. 56, p < 0.001), and had higher 28-day mortality (43.3% vs. 26.2%, p < 0.001). AKI was more frequent in patients with DIC (86.8% vs. 74.2%, p < 0.005), particularly for the more severe stage of AKI [KDIGO 3 in 58.1% of patients with DIC vs. 30.8% of patients without DIC, p < 0.001, AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in 47.3% of patients with DIC vs. 21.3% of patients without DIC, p < 0.001]. After adjustment for confounding factors, DIC occurrence remained associated with the risk of having the more severe stage of AKI with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.74 [IC 95% (1.53–4.91), p < 0.001], and with the risk of requiring RRT during the ICU stay [OR 2.82 (1.53–5.2), p < 0.001]. Conclusion: DIC appears to be strongly associated with the risk of developing the more severe form of AKI (stage 3 of the KDIGO classification, RRT requirement), even after adjustment for severity and other relevant factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite significant advancements in critical care medicine, limited attention has been given to sex and gender disparities in management and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). While "sex" pertains to biological and physiological characteristics, such as reproductive organs, chromosomes and sex hormones, "gender" refers more to sociocultural roles and human behavior. Unfortunately, data on gender-related topics in the ICU are lacking. Consequently, data on sex and gender-related differences in admission to the ICU, clinical course, length of stay, mortality, and post-ICU burdens, are often inconsistent. Moreover, when examining specific diagnoses in the ICU, variations can be observed in epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, severity, and treatment response due to the distinct impact of sex hormones on the immune and cardiovascular systems. In this narrative review, we highlight the influence of sex and gender on the clinical course, management, and outcomes of the most encountered intensive care conditions, in addition to the potential co-existence of unconscious biases which may also impact critical illness. Diagnoses with a known sex predilection will be discussed within the context of underlying sex differences in physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology with the goal of identifying areas where clinical improvement is needed. To optimize patient care and outcomes, it is crucial to comprehend and address sex and gender differences in the ICU setting and personalize management accordingly to ensure equitable, patient-centered care. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving sex and gender disparities, as well as exploring targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities and improve outcomes for all critically ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Altogether, new-onset RV dilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) patient in shock should trigger the suspicion of high-risk PE, and the diagnosis be confirmed as soon as feasible by CTPA or other imaging tests. Reperfusion therapy Patients with high-risk PE have a clear indication for immediate reperfusion therapy, followed by therapeutic anticoagulation by unfractionated heparin. According to the European guidelines, high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is defined as PE associated with hemodynamic instability, including sustained hypotension, cardiogenic shock and/or cardiac arrest [[1]]. For patients with a contraindication for (systemic) thrombolysis, mechanical catheter embolectomy techniques are nonetheless a promising option, as well as in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [[9]] (Fig. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The number of heatstroke victims hit record numbers in 2022 as global warming continues. In heat-induced injuries, circulatory shock is the most severe and deadly complication. This review aims to examine the mechanisms and potential approaches to heat-induced shock and the life-threatening complications of heatstroke. Methods: A computer-based online search was performed using the PubMed database and Web of Science database for published articles concerning heatstroke, shock, inflammation, coagulopathy, endothelial cell, cell death, and heat shock proteins. Results: Dehydration and heat-induced cardiomyopathy were reported as the major causes of heat-induced shock, although other heat-induced injuries are also involved in the pathogenesis of circulatory shock. In addition to dehydration, the blood volume decreases considerably due to the increased vascular permeability as a consequence of endothelial damage. Systemic inflammation is induced by factors that include elevated cytokine and chemokine levels, dysregulated coagulation/fibrinolytic responses, and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from necrotic cell death that cause distributive shock. The cytoprotective heat shock proteins can also facilitate circulatory disturbance under excess heat stress. Conclusions: Multiple mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of heat-induced shock. In addition to dehydration, heat stress-induced cardiomyopathy due to the thermal damage of mitochondria, upregulated inflammation via damage-associated molecular patterns released from oncotic cells, unbalanced coagulation/fibrinolysis, and endothelial damage are the major factors that are related to circulatory shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coagulopathy is a severe and frequent complication in critically ill patients, for which the pathogenesis and presentation may be variable depending on the underlying disease. Based on the dominant clinical phenotype, the current review differentiates between hemorrhagic coagulopathies, characterized by a hypocoagulable and hyperfibrinolysis state, and thrombotic coagulopathies with a systemic prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic phenotype. We discuss the differences in pathogenesis and treatment of the common coagulopathies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a comment on an article about sepsis-induced coagulopathy. The authors discuss the role of fibrinogen, an acute-phase protein, in sepsis. While elevated fibrinogen levels in sepsis patients can contribute to immunothrombosis and enhance immune responses, they can also lead to a hypercoagulable state and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The authors highlight the challenges in interpreting fibrinogen levels and platelet count in sepsis-induced DIC and emphasize the importance of monitoring hemostasis markers for effective diagnosis and treatment. [Extracted from the article]

Also, as risk factors for thromboprophylaxis failure include an elevated BMI, a personal/family history of VTE, or vasopressor use, it is likely that more aggressive and multimodal strategies should be used in some at-risk patients [[10]], maybe including mechanical thromboprophylaxis. In a recent retrospective analysis of more than 1.4 million critically ill patients, 4% of patients did not receive any form of thromboprophylaxis within the first 24 h after ICU admission without obvious reason [[9]]. The guidelines also suggest no prophylaxis or the use of intermittent pneumatic compression in patients with a platelet count less than 50,000/mm SP 3 sp or a high risk of bleeding (Grade 2C) and the careful use of pharmacological prophylaxis in patients with severe liver failure. LMWH is preferred over UFH for VTE prophylaxis in the ICU, unless in patients with severe renal insufficiency, where the use of low-dose heparin, dalteparin or reduced doses of enoxaparin might be preferred. [Extracted from the article]

35788622 5 Labbé V, Contou D, Heming N, Megarbane B, Razazi K, Boissier F. Comparison of standard dose prophylactic, high dose prophylactic, and therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with severe COVID-19. the ANTICOVID randomised clinical trial. By contrast, in a retrospective, observational before/after bi-centric cohort study among ICU patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 and receiving therapeutic anticoagulation by unfractionated heparin, dexamethasone (DXM) was associated with a decrease in both proinflammatory and procoagulant profile. [Extracted from the article]

Catheter removal was associated with thrombosis resolution in all the patients in whom catheter was removed because of thrombosis, representing 14% of the patients with catheter-related venous thrombosis. Critically ill patients represent a population at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a rare, but life-threatening condition occurring among critically ill patients. Several factors have been associated with AMI, but the causal link is debated, most studies being retrospective. Among these factors, enteral nutrition (EN) could be associated with AMI, in particular among patients with shock. We aimed to study the factors independently associated with AMI in a post hoc analysis of the NUTRIREA-2 trial including 2410 critically ill ventilated patients with shock, randomly assigned to receive EN or parenteral nutrition (PN). Methods: Post hoc analysis of the NUTRIREA-2 trial was conducted. Ventilated adults with shock were randomly assigned to receive EN or PN. AMI was assessed by computed tomography, endoscopy, or laparotomy. Factors associated with AMI were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: 2410 patients from 44 French intensive care units (ICUs) were included in the study: 1202 patients in the enteral group and 1208 patients in the parenteral group. The median age was 67 [58–76] years, with 67% men, a SAPS II score of 59 [46–74], and a medical cause for ICU admission in 92.7%. AMI was diagnosed among 24 (1%) patients, mainly by computed tomography (79%) or endoscopy (38%). The mechanism of AMI was non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (n = 12), occlusive (n = 4), and indeterminate (n = 8). The median duration between inclusion in the trial and AMI diagnosis was 4 [1–11] days. Patients with AMI were older, had a higher SAPS II score at ICU admission, had higher plasma lactate, creatinine, and ASAT concentrations and lower hemoglobin concentration, had more frequently EN, dobutamine, and CVVHDF at inclusion, developed more frequently bacteremia during ICU stay, and had higher 28-day and 90-day mortality rates compared with patients without AMI. By multivariate analysis, AMI was independently associated with EN, dobutamine use, SAPS II score ≥ 62 and hemoglobin concentration ≤ 10.9 g/dL. Conclusion: Among critically ill ventilated patients with shock, EN, dobutamine use, SAPS II score ≥ 62 and hemoglobin ≤ 10.9 g/dL were independently associated with AMI. Among critically ill ventilated patients requiring vasopressors, EN should be delayed or introduced cautiously in case of low cardiac output requiring dobutamine and/or in case of multiple organ failure with high SAPS II score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a comment on a recent publication that explores the relationship between D-dimer levels and bleeding outcomes in patients who underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The comment acknowledges the recommendations of other researchers to use additional tests like thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to understand the causality of elevated D-dimer levels. However, the authors argue that these tests have limitations and may not accurately assess fibrinolytic activity. They propose that assessing fibrinolytic activity through dynamic changes in D-dimer levels provides a more accurate association with bleeding. The document also discusses the challenges of finding an optimal anticoagulation protocol for ECMO patients and mentions an ongoing trial investigating reduced anticoagulation targets. The authors declare no conflicts of interest or funding. [Extracted from the article]

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is presenting as a systemic disease associated with vascular inflammation and endothelial injury. Severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection induce acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and there is still an ongoing debate on whether COVID-19 ARDS and its perfusion defect differs from ARDS induced by other causes. Beside pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as interleukin-1 β [IL-1β] or IL-6), several main pathological phenomena have been seen because of endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction: hypercoagulation reflected by fibrin degradation products called D-dimers, micro- and macrothrombosis and pathological angiogenesis. Direct endothelial infection by SARS-CoV-2 is not likely to occur and ACE-2 expression by EC is a matter of debate. Indeed, endothelial damage reported in severely ill patients with COVID-19 could be more likely secondary to infection of neighboring cells and/or a consequence of inflammation. Endotheliopathy could give rise to hypercoagulation by alteration in the levels of different factors such as von Willebrand factor. Other than thrombotic events, pathological angiogenesis is among the recent findings. Overexpression of different proangiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) or placental growth factors (PlGF) have been found in plasma or lung biopsies of COVID-19 patients. Finally, SARS-CoV-2 infection induces an emergency myelopoiesis associated to deregulated immunity and mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells, leading to features of acquired hematological malignancies or cardiovascular disease, which are discussed in this review. Altogether, this review will try to elucidate the pathophysiology of thrombotic complications, pathological angiogenesis and EC dysfunction, allowing better insight in new targets and antithrombotic protocols to better address vascular system dysfunction. Since treating SARS-CoV-2 infection and its potential long-term effects involves targeting the vascular compartment and/or mobilization of immature immune cells, we propose to define COVID-19 and its complications as a systemic vascular acquired hemopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In comatose patients receiving oro-tracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation (MV), the risk of aspiration is increased. Aspiration can lead to chemical pneumonitis (inflammatory reaction to the gastric contents), or aspiration pneumonia (infection caused by inhalation of microorganisms). Distinguishing between the two types is challenging. We tested the interest of using a decisional algorithm based on procalcitonin (PCT) values to guide initiation and discontinuation of antibiotic therapies in intubated patients. Methods: The PROPASPI (PROcalcitonin Pneumonia/pneumonitis Associated with ASPIration) trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, superiority study comparing two strategies: (1) an intervention group where threshold PCT values were used to guide initiation and discontinuation of antibiotics (PCT group); and (2) a control group, where antibiotic therapy was managed at the physician's discretion. Patients aged 18 years or over, intubated for coma (Glasgow score ≤ 8), with MV initiated within 48 h after admission, were eligible. The primary endpoint was the duration of antibiotic treatment during the first 15 days after admission to the ICU. Results: From 24/2/2015 to 28/8/2019, 1712 patients were intubated for coma in the 5 participating centers, of whom 166 were included in the study. Data from 159 were available for intention-to-treat analysis: 81 in the PCT group, and 78 in the control group. Overall, 67 patients (43%) received antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU); there was no significant difference between groups (37 (46%) vs 30 (40%) for PCT vs control, p = 0.432). The mean duration of antibiotic treatment during the first 15 days in the ICU was 2.7 ± 3.8 days; there was no significant difference between groups (3.0 ± 4.1 days vs 2.3 ± 3.4 days for PCT vs control, p = 0.311). The mean number of days under MV was significantly higher in the PCT group (3.7 ± 3.6 days) than in controls (2.7 ± 2.5 days, p = 0.033). The duration of ICU stay was also significantly longer in the PCT group: 6.4 ± 6.5 days vs 4.6 ± 3.5 days in the control group (p = 0.043). After adjustment for SAPS II score, the difference in length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation between groups was no longer significant. Conclusion: The use of PCT values to guide therapy, in comparison to the use of clinical, biological (apart from PCT) and radiological criteria, does not modify exposure to antibiotics in patients intubated for coma. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02862314. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: During the COVID-19 outbreak, the presence of extensive white matter microhemorrhages was detected by brain MRIs. The goal of this study was to investigate the origin of this atypical hemorrhagic complication. Methods: Between March 17 and May 18, 2020, 80 patients with severe COVID-19 infections were admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome to intensive care units at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg for whom a brain MRI for neurologic manifestations was performed. 19 patients (24%) with diffuse microhemorrhages were compared to 18 control patients with COVID-19 and normal brain MRI. Results: The first hypothesis was hypoxemia. The latter seemed very likely since respiratory failure was longer and more pronounced in patients with microhemorrhages (prolonged endotracheal intubation (p = 0.0002), higher FiO2 (p = 0.03), increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p = 0.04)). A relevant hypothesis, the role of microangiopathy, was also considered, since patients with microhemorrhages presented a higher increase of the D-Dimers (p = 0.01) and a tendency to more frequent thrombotic events (p = 0.12). Another hypothesis tested was the role of kidney failure, which was more severe in the group with diffuse microhemorrhages (higher creatinine level [median of 293 µmol/L versus 112 µmol/L, p = 0.04] and more dialysis were introduced in this group during ICU stay [12 versus 5 patients, p = 0.04]). Conclusions: Blood–brain barrier dysfunction secondary to hypoxemia and high concentration of uremic toxins seems to be the main mechanism leading to critical illness-associated cerebral microbleeds, and this complication remains to be frequently described in severe COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a correction notice for an article titled "Contemporary management of major haemorrhage in critical care" published in the journal Intensive Care Medicine. The correction addresses an error in the name of the 5th author, stating that the correct name is Lidia Mora Miquel, with the family name being Mora Miquel and the given name being Lidia. The original publication has been corrected, and the authors apologize for the mistake. The publisher, Springer Nature, remains neutral regarding jurisdictional claims and institutional affiliations. [Extracted from the article]

Contrary to heart disease, thirty years of intensive care research has yielded little literature showing differential treatment given to women. In addition, although they chose a Bayesian approach for analyzing the probability of ICU admission, analysis was conducted using non-informative priors, thus taking into consideration that prior data on differential treatment for men and women in relation to ICU admission is lacking. 10.1503/cmaj.071112 12 Blecha S, Zeman F, Specht S, Lydia Pfefferle A, Placek S, Karagiannidis C, Bein T. Invasiveness of treatment is gender dependent in intensive care results from a retrospective analysis of 26,711 cases. While it is true that mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy and the use of vasoactive drugs are all used in patients that are more sick, these interventions are only surrogates for patient acuity. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The phase 3 multinational SCARLET study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (ART-123) for treatment of sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC), which correlates with increased mortality risk in patients with sepsis. Although no significant reduction in mortality was observed with ART-123 compared with placebo in the full analysis set (FAS), an efficacy signal of ART-123 was observed in subgroups of patients who sustained coagulopathy until the first treatment and those not administered concomitant heparin. Post hoc analysis was performed of patients treated in France, the country with the largest enrollment (19% of the FAS) and consistent patient enrollment throughout the study duration. Methods: Adult patients with SAC (international normalized ratio > 1.4; platelets > 30 × 109/L to < 150 × 109/L or platelet decrease > 30% within 24 h) and evidence of bacterial infection were included. The primary efficacy outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included adverse, serious adverse, and major bleeding events. This analysis assessed patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in France compared with the rest of the world (ROW; excluding France). Mortality rates were assessed in patients in France or the ROW with characteristics previously associated with ART-123 efficacy. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between France and the ROW, but some measurements of disease severity were higher in patients in France. The 28-day all-cause mortality absolute risk reductions (ARRs) with ART-123 were 8.3% in France and 1.1% in the ROW. The greater ARR in France may be related to a higher rate of sustained coagulopathy and lower rate of heparin use. In France and the ROW, 84.6% and 78.0% of patients sustained coagulopathy from the time of initial SAC diagnosis to first treatment with the study drug, and 65.8% and 43.9% did not receive heparin, respectively. The ARRs for these subgroups of patients in France were 13.4% and 16.6%, respectively. Safety of ART-123 was comparable between France and the ROW. Conclusions: Results from this exploratory analysis suggest that patients with sustained SAC not receiving concomitant heparin may benefit from ART-123, a fact that should be confirmed in future studies with more restrictive inclusion criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with severe hemorrhagic complications ( I n i = 17) and those without ( I n i = 13), as well as UFH bolus at ECMO implantation and UFH doses during ECMO. In a recent series of 7579 veno-venous ECMO, 37% of patients experienced hemorrhages, and 21% presented both bleeding and thrombotic events while on ECMO [[1]]. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Thromboprophylaxis of COVID-19 patients is a highly debated issue. We aimed to compare the occurrence of thrombotic/ischemic events in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with either prophylactic or therapeutic dosage of heparin. All patients referred for COVID-19 ARDS in two intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital were included in our cohort study. Patients were compared according to their anticoagulant treatment to evaluate the risk/benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation versus therapeutic anticoagulation. Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected. Results: One hundred and seventy-nine patients (73% men) were analyzed: 108 in prophylactic group and 71 in therapeutic group. Median age and SAPS II were 62 [IQR 51; 70] years and 47 [IQR 37; 63] points. ICU mortality rate was 17.3%. Fifty-seven patients developed clinically relevant thrombotic complications during their ICU stay, less frequently in therapeutic group (adjusted OR 0.38 [0.14–0.94], p = 0.04). The occurrences of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and ischemic stroke were significantly lower in the therapeutic group (respective adjusted OR for PE: 0.19 [0.03–0.81]; DVT: 0.13 [0.01–0.89], stroke: 0.06 [0–0.68], all p < 0.05). The occurrence of bleeding complications was not significantly different between groups, neither were ICU length of stay or mortality rate. D-dimer levels were significantly lower during ICU stay, and aPTT ratio was more prolonged in the therapeutic group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Increasing the anticoagulation of severe COVID-19 patients to a therapeutic level might decrease thrombotic complications without increasing their bleeding risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

However, while coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) typically begins as an infection of the upper aerodigestive tract, it may progress to severe forms, with an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and a multisystemic disease. Finally, a bundle of evidence has assessed the neurotropism and neurological injury caused by SARS-CoV-2, although the multiple pathways to access the central nervous system (CNS) in COVID-19 patients are unknown. The alveolar cells are lined by superimposed hyaline membranes (original magnification x200; tissue specimen by courtesy of Petra Jasker, Institute for Pathology und Dermatology, Düsseldorf, Germany). c. Scanning electron microscopy image of a pulmonary COVID-19 specimen with ARDS / DAD. [Extracted from the article]

Cardiac histopathological findings in deceased COVID-19 patients mainly combined inflammatory and prothrombotic features, congestive cardiomyopathy, and injuries due to prior conditions, like atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial hypertrophy, but only few cases reported focal lymphocytic myocarditis [[8]]. SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for an excessive local and systemic coagulation activation with platelet activation and dysregulated immunothrombosis explaining how patients suffering from COVID-19 might develop in situ pulmonary microthrombi [[8]], but also pulmonary occlusions (embolisms) in up to 30% of the most severe patients [[9]]. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can present with a large panel of cardiac manifestations, including myocardial infarction with (type 1) or without (type 2) obstructive coronary artery disease, arterial or venous thromboembolic disease, pericarditis and myocarditis, arrhythmias, acute heart failure, shock or cardiac arrest [[1]]. [Extracted from the article]

Background: There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2. Results: 582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with "coagulopathy". The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients. Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Methods: All patients referred to 4 intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 between March 3rd and 31st 2020 were included. Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected. Propensity score matching was performed to analyze the occurrence of thromboembolic events between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients.Results: 150 COVID-19 patients were included (122 men, median age 63 [53; 71] years, SAPSII 49 [37; 64] points). Sixty-four clinically relevant thrombotic complications were diagnosed in 150 patients, mainly pulmonary embolisms (16.7%). 28/29 patients (96.6%) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy experienced circuit clotting. Three thrombotic occlusions (in 2 patients) of centrifugal pump occurred in 12 patients (8%) supported by ECMO. Most patients (> 95%) had elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen. No patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation. Von Willebrand (vWF) activity, vWF antigen and FVIII were considerably increased, and 50/57 tested patients (87.7%) had positive lupus anticoagulant. Comparison with non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 145) confirmed that COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 77) developed significantly more thrombotic complications, mainly pulmonary embolisms (11.7 vs. 2.1%, p < 0.008). Coagulation parameters significantly differed between the two groups.Conclusion: Despite anticoagulation, a high number of patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 developed life-threatening thrombotic complications. Higher anticoagulation targets than in usual critically ill patients should therefore probably be suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the benefit-to-risk balance of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods: In 16 ICUs, we prospectively collected adverse events during or within 24 h after BAL and assessed the BAL input for decision making in consecutive adult patients. The occurrence of a clinical adverse event at least of grade 3, i.e., sufficiently severe to need therapeutic action(s), including modification(s) in respiratory support, defined poor BAL tolerance. The BAL input for decision making was declared satisfactory if it allowed to interrupt or initiate one or several treatments.Results: We included 483 BAL in 483 patients [age 63 years (interquartile range (IQR) 53-72); female gender: 162 (33.5%); simplified acute physiology score II: 48 (IQR 37-61); immunosuppression 244 (50.5%)]. BAL was begun in non-intubated patients in 105 (21.7%) cases. Sixty-seven (13.9%) patients reached the grade 3 of adverse event or higher. Logistic regression showed that a BAL performed by a non-experienced physician (non-pulmonologist, or intensivist with less than 10 years in the specialty or less than 50 BAL performed) was the main predictor of poor BAL tolerance in non-intubated patients [OR: 3.57 (95% confidence interval 1.04-12.35); P = 0.04]. A satisfactory BAL input for decision making was observed in 227 (47.0%) cases and was not predictable using logistic regression.Conclusions: Adverse events related to BAL in ICU patients are not infrequent nor necessarily benign. Our findings call for an extreme caution, when envisaging a BAL in ICU patients and for a mandatory accompaniment of the less experienced physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The influence of socioeconomic status on patient outcomes is unclear. We assessed the impact of socioeconomic deprivation on severity of illness at intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and on the risk of death at 3 months after ICU admission. Methods: The IVOIRE study was a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study in the ICU of 8 participating hospitals in France, including patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted to the ICU and receiving at least one life support therapy for organ failure. The primary outcomes were severity at admission (assessed by SAPSII score), and mortality at 3 months. Socioeconomic data were obtained from interviews with patients or family. Deprivation was assessed using the EPICES score. Results: Among 1294 patents included between 2013 and 2016, 629 (48.6%) were classed as deprived and differed significantly from non-deprived subjects in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and pre-existing conditions. The mean SAPS II score at admission was 50.1 ± 19.4 in deprived patients and 52.3 ± 17.3 in non-deprived patients, with no significant difference by multivariable analysis (β = − 1.85 [95% CI − 3.86; + 0.16, p = 0.072]). The proportion of death was 31.1% at 3 months, without significant differences between deprived and non-deprived patients, even after adjustment for confounders. Conclusions: Deprivation is frequent in patients admitted to the ICU and is not associated with disease severity at admission, or with mortality at 3 months between deprived and non-deprived patients. Trial registration The IVOIRE cohort is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01907581, registration date 17/7/2013 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current international outbreak of respiratory illness due to SARS-CoV-2 and named Covid-19 can evolve to severe progressive pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure, and death. Hydroxychloroquine has been found to be more potent than chloroquine to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro [[3]] and a recent report suggested that 70% of 20 non-ICU hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had negative PCR results in nasopharyngeal samples at day 6 (D6) post-inclusion [[4]] and in all the 6 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combination (hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin) [[4]]. Although a positive PCR is not synonymous with active viral development, these results highlight the fact that neither of the treatments was able to achieve a rapid viral clearance in ARDS patients, as it has been suggested in one report on non-severe patients [[4]]. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: Conflict of interest (COI) may compromise, or have the appearance of compromising, a researcher's judgment or integrity in conducting or reporting research. We sought to assess time trends of COI and funding statement reporting in the critical care literature.Methods: PubMed was searched by using Medical Subject Headings and the appropriate corresponding keywords: "INTENSIVE CARE UNIT" or "ICU" as a major topic. Four years in a 15-year time period (2001-2016) were arbitrarily chosen and one study month was randomly selected for each study period. Studies published during the selected months were included in the analysis.Results: Three hundred and seventy-four studies were evaluated, including five reviews (1.3%) and ten randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (2.7%). COI statements were available in 65% of the studies and 8% had declared COI. COI statement rate, declared COI and funding statements increased over time, while the number of authors affiliated with industry and the discordance between the lack of COI statement and affiliation with industry decreased. Declared COI were more frequent in 2011-2016 as compared to 2001-2010 (OR 4.06; 95% CI 1.15-25.79) and in the higher quartile of a journal's impact factor (OR of 16.73; 95% CI 3.28-306.20). Surprisingly, focus of the study, country of the first author and/or endorsement of the study by a trial group were not associated with COI statements.Conclusion: Our study suggests COI reporting to have been unintuitive to most investigators and unreliable before ICMJE statements, and that strong incentives are needed to implement adequate reporting of COI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Thrombocytopenia is a frequent and serious adverse event in patients treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for refractory cardiogenic shock. Similarly to postcardiac surgery patients, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) could represent the causative underlying mechanism. However, the epidemiology as well as related mortality regarding HIT and VA-ECMO remains largely unknown. We aimed to define the prevalence and associated 90-day mortality of HIT diagnosed under VA-ECMO.Methods: This retrospective study included patients under VA-ECMO from 20 French centers between 2012 and 2016. Selected patients were hospitalized for more than 3 days with high clinical suspicion of HIT and positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Patients were classified according to results of functional tests as having either Confirmed or Excluded HIT.Results: A total of 5797 patients under VA-ECMO were screened; 39/5797 met the inclusion criteria, with HIT confirmed in 21/5797 patients (0.36% [95% CI] [0.21-0.52]). Fourteen of 39 patients (35.9% [20.8-50.9]) with suspected HIT were ultimately excluded because of negative functional assays. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia tended to be more frequent in Excluded HIT at the time of HIT suspicion (p = 0.073). The platelet course was similar between Confirmed and Excluded HIT (p = 0.65). Mortality rate was 33.3% [13.2-53.5] in Confirmed and 50% [23.8-76.2] in Excluded HIT (p = 0.48).Conclusions: Prevalence of HIT among patients under VA-ECMO is extremely low at 0.36% with an associated mortality rate of 33.3%, which appears to be in the same range as that observed in patients treated with VA-ECMO without HIT. In addition, HIT was ultimately ruled out in one-third of patients with clinical suspicion of HIT and positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation is responsible for increased occurrence of multiple organ dysfunction and mortality. Immunothrombosis-induced coagulopathy may contribute to hypercoagulability. We aimed at determining whether recombinant human thrombomodulin (rhTM) could control exaggerated immunothrombosis by studying procoagulant responses, fibrinolysis activity borne by microvesicles (MVs) and NETosis in septic shock. Methods: In a septic shock model after a cecal ligation and puncture-induced peritonitis (H0), rats were treated with rhTM or a placebo at H18, resuscitated and monitored during 4 h. At H22, blood was sampled to perform coagulation tests, to characterize MVs and to detect neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs). Lungs were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for inflammatory injury assessment. Results: Coagulopathy was attenuated in rhTM-treated septic rats compared to placebo-treated rats, as attested by a significant decrease in procoagulant annexin A5-MVs and plasma procoagulant activity of phospholipids and by a significant increase in antithrombin levels (84 ± 8 vs. 64 ± 6%, p < 0.05), platelet count (582 ± 157 vs. 319 ± 91 × 10/L, p < 0.05) and fibrinolysis activity borne by MVs (2.9 ± 0.26 vs. 0.48 ± 0.29 U/mL urokinase, p < 0.05). Lung histological injury score showed significantly less leukocyte infiltration. Decreased procoagulant activity and lung injury were concomitant with decreased leukocyte activation as attested by plasma leukocyte-derived MVs and NETosis reduction after rhTM treatment (neutrophil elastase/DNA: 93 ± 33 vs. 227 ± 48 and citrullinated histones H3/DNA: 96 ± 16 vs. 242 ± 180, mOD for 10 neutrophils/L, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Thrombomodulin limits procoagulant responses and NETosis and at least partly restores hemostasis control during immunothrombosis. Neutrophils might thus stand as a promising therapeutic target in septic shock-induced coagulopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Host infection by a micro-organism triggers systemic inflammation, innate immunity and complement pathways, but also haemostasis activation. The role of thrombin and fibrin generation in host defence is now recognised, and thrombin has become a partner for survival, while it was seen only as one of the 'principal suspects' of multiple organ failure and death during septic shock. This review is first focused on pathophysiology. The role of contact activation system, polyphosphates and neutrophil extracellular traps has emerged, offering new potential therapeutic targets. Interestingly, newly recognised host defence peptides (HDPs), derived from thrombin and other 'coagulation' factors, are potent inhibitors of bacterial growth. Inhibition of thrombin generation could promote bacterial growth, while HDPs could become novel therapeutic agents against pathogens when resistance to conventional therapies grows. In a second part, we focused on sepsis-induced coagulopathy diagnostic challenge and stratification from 'adaptive' haemostasis to 'noxious' disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) either thrombotic or haemorrhagic. Besides usual coagulation tests, we discussed cellular haemostasis assessment including neutrophil, platelet and endothelial cell activation. Then, we examined therapeutic opportunities to prevent or to reduce 'excess' thrombin generation, while preserving 'adaptive' haemostasis. The fail of international randomised trials involving anticoagulants during septic shock may modify the hypothesis considering the end of haemostasis as a target to improve survival. On the one hand, patients at low risk of mortality may not be treated to preserve 'immunothrombosis' as a defence when, on the other hand, patients at high risk with patent excess thrombin and fibrin generation could benefit from available (antithrombin, soluble thrombomodulin) or ongoing (FXI and FXII inhibitors) therapies. We propose to better assess coagulation response during infection by an improved knowledge of pathophysiology and systematic testing including determination of DIC scores. This is one of the clues to allocate the right treatment for the right patient at the right moment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We the Editorial Board of Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) acknowledge receipt of the Letter to the Editor by C. J. Wiedermann [[1]] concerning the body of work by Joachim Boldt [[2]]. Wiedermann calls upon ICM to support research integrity by re-evaluating the articles by Boldt that have not been retracted. [Extracted from the article]

The French Intensive Care Society organized its yearly Paris International Conference in intensive care on June 18-19, 2015. The main purpose of this meeting is to gather the best experts in the field in order to provide the highest quality update on a chosen topic. In 2015, the selected theme was: 'Acute Renal Failure in the ICU: from injury to recovery.' The conference program covered multiple aspects of renal failure, including epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and kidney support system, prognosis and recovery together with acute renal failure in specific settings. The present report provides a summary of every presentation including the key message and references and is structured in eight sections: (a) diagnosis and evaluation, (b) old and new diagnosis tools, (c) old and new treatments, (d) renal replacement therapy and management, (e) acute renal failure witness of other conditions, (f) prognosis and recovery, (g) extracorporeal epuration beyond the kidney, (h) the use of biomarkers in clinical practice . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Data for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients requiring intensive care are scarce. Methods: We included 97 consecutive patients with acute AAV manifestations (new onset or relapsing disease), admitted to 18 intensive care units (ICUs) over a 10-year period (2002-2012). A group of 95 consecutive AAV patients with new onset or relapsing disease, admitted to two nephrology departments with acute vasculitis manifestations, constituted the control group. Results: In the ICU group, patients predominantly showed granulomatosis with polyangiitis and proteinase-3 ANCAs. Compared with the non-ICU group, the ICU group showed comparable Birmingham vasculitis activity score and a higher frequency of heart, central nervous system and lungs involvements. Respiratory assistance, renal replacement therapy and vasopressors were required in 68.0, 56.7 and 26.8% of ICU patients, respectively. All but one patient (99%) received glucocorticoids, 85.6% received cyclophosphamide, and 49.5% had plasma exchanges as remission induction regimens. Fifteen (15.5%) patients died during the ICU stay. The following were significantly associated with ICU mortality in the univariate analysis: the need for respiratory assistance, the use of vasopressors, the occurrence of at least one infection event in ICU, cyclophosphamide treatment, sequential organ failure assessment at admission and simplified acute physiology score II. After adjustment on sequential organ failure assessment or infection, cyclophosphamide was no longer a risk factor for mortality. Despite a higher initial mortality rate of ICU patients within the first hospital stay ( p < 0.0001), the long-term mortality of hospital survivors did not differ between ICU and non-ICU groups (18.6 and 20.4%, respectively, p = 0.36). Moreover, we observed no renal survival difference between groups after a 1-year follow-up (82.1 and 80.5%, p = 0.94). Conclusion: This study supports the idea that experiencing an ICU challenge does not impact the long-term prognosis of AAV patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Few outcome data are available about temperature management after intraoperative cardiac arrest (IOCA). We describe targeted temperature management (TTM) (32-34 °C) modalities, adverse events, and association with 1-year functional outcome in patients with IOCA.Methods: Patients admitted to 11 ICUs after IOCA in 2008-2013 were studied retrospectively. The main outcome measure was 1-year functional outcome.Results: Of the 101 patients [35 women and 66 men; median age, 62 years (interquartile range, 42-72)], 68 (67.3%) were ASA PS I to III and 57 (56.4%) had emergent surgery. First recorded rhythms were asystole in 44 (43.6%) patients, pulseless electrical activity in 36 (35.6%), and ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia in 20 (19.8%). Median times from collapse to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were 0 min (0-0) and 10 min (4-20), respectively. The 30 (29.7%) patients who received TTM had an increased risk of infection (P = 0.005) but not of arrhythmia, bleeding, or metabolic/electrolyte disorders. By multivariate analysis, one or more defibrillation before ROSC was positively associated with a favorable functional outcome at 1-year (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.05-8.95, P = 0.04) and emergency surgery was negatively associated with 1-year favorable functional outcome (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14-0.95, P = 0.038). TTM use was not independently associated with 1-year favorable outcome (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.27-2.46, P = 0.72).Conclusions: TTM was used in less than one-third of patients after IOCA. TTM was associated with infection but not with bleeding or coronary events in this setting. TTM did not independently predict 1-year favorable functional outcome after IOCA in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this issue of Intensive Care Medicine, we describe a population of 78 critical care highly prolific authors having published more than 40 publications within the last 5 years [[1]]. Non-European critical care authors published significantly more when considering the median total number of publications [286 (361-189) vs. 197 (278-147) publications, I p i = 0.03], were more cited [8385 (6289-12796) vs. 5009 (3734-8600) citations, I p i = 0.001] and had a higher total H-index [46 (39-53) vs. 36 (28-45) I p i < 0.001], with oceanic authors being the most prolific (ESM Fig. Critical care journal choices also differed according to the continent of the authors: while non-Europeans published more in AJRCCM, Chest and Critical Care Medicine, Intensive Care Medicine and Critical Care were more frequently chosen by European authors ( I p i < 0.01 each). [Extracted from the article]

19,305 articles published by 51,891 authors were identified in Pubmed between 2013 and 2018, considering the eight critical care medicine journals with a 2017-impact factor above five (ESM Fig. Overall, 78 authors were included and their 4510 publications (4095 publications in the eight critical care medicine journals and 415 publications in the four major non-critical care journals) analyzed (ESM Fig. Among the eight critical care medicine journals, the articles were mostly published in Intensive Care Medicine, followed by Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care, Resuscitation and AJRCCM, and in the JAMA followed by NEJM for the four major non-critical care journals (ESM Fig. [Extracted from the article]

Although our questionnaire was based on self-reported data and thereby may not reflect true attitudes, the prolific critical care authors did not seem to have succumbed to these temptations and most of the authors (82%) declared they have met all the ICMJE criteria in more than half of their articles in the past 5 years. A possible contributing factor to critical care not being as affected could be the high degree of clinical work amongst critical care authors compared to other medical specialties whereby publications may have the same influence on careers. [Extracted from the article]

The article offers information on the impact of a multicomponent implementation intervention on the clinical practice of pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. It mentions thromboprophylaxis of critical care patients is a major clinical and economical issue; and also mentions randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pharmacological thromboprophylaxis suggested that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) would be more efficacious than unfractionated heparin (UFH).

Purpose: To describe the current practices of volume expansion in French intensive care units (ICU). Methods: In 19 ICUs, we prospectively observed the prescription and monitoring practices of volume expansion in consecutive adult patients with shock [sustained hypotension and/or need of vasopressor therapy, associated with at least tachycardia and/or sign (s) of hypoperfusion]. Patients were included at the time of prescription of the first fluid bolus (FB). Thereafter, all the FBs administered during the 96 h following shock onset were surveyed. An FB was defined as an intravenous bolus of at least 100 ml of a blood volume expander intended to rapidly improve the patient's circulatory condition. Results: We included 777 patients [age: 63 ± 15 years; female gender: 274 (35 %); simplified acute physiology score II: 55.9 ± 20.6; ICU length of stay: 6 days (interquartile range (IQR) 3-13); ICU mortality: 32.8 %] and surveyed 2,694 FBs. At enrolment mean arterial pressure was 63 mmHg (IQR 55-71). The most frequent triggers of FB were hypotension, low urine output, tachycardia, skin mottling and hyperlactataemia. Amount of fluid given at each FB was highly variable between centres. Crystalloids were used in 91 % (2,394/2,635) and synthetic colloids in 3.3 % (87/2,635) of FBs. Overall, clinicians used any kind of haemodynamic assessment (central venous pressure measurement, predictive indices of fluid responsiveness, echocardiography, cardiac output monitoring or a combination of these) in 23.6 % (635/2,694) of all FBs surveyed, with an important between-centre heterogeneity. Conclusions: High between-centre variability characterised all the aspects of FB prescription and monitoring, but overall haemodynamic exploration to help guide and monitor FB was infrequent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]