Search

Mobocertinib (TAK-788) is a first-in-class oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that received accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. This phase 1, 2-period, study was conducted to assess the absolute bioavailability of mobocertinib (Period 1), as well as mass balance, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of [14C]-mobocertinib (Period 2) in healthy adult males. In Period 1, participants received a single oral capsule dose of 160 mg mobocertinib, followed by a 15-minute intravenous infusion of 50 µg (~ 2 µCi) [14C]-mobocertinib administered from 3.75 to 4 h after the capsule dose. In Period 2, a single oral dose of 160 mg (~ 100 µCi) [14C]-mobocertinib was administered as an oral solution. The geometric mean absolute bioavailability of mobocertinib was determined to be 36.7%. After oral administration of [14C]-mobocertinib, mobocertinib and its active metabolites, AP32960 and AP32914, were minor components in plasma, accounting for only 0.275% of total plasma radioactivity as the majority of mobocertinib-related material was covalently bound to plasma proteins. The geometric mean percentage of the administered radioactive dose recovered in the urine and feces was 3.57% and 76.0%, respectively. Only 0.39% of the oral dose of [14C]-mobocertinib was recovered in the urine as mobocertinib; thus, indicating that renal excretion of unchanged drug was a very minor pathway of elimination. In both treatment periods, mobocertinib was generally safe and well-tolerated as all adverse events were Grade 1 in severity. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03811834. Registration date January 22, 2019). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor designed to overcome mechanisms of resistance associated with crizotinib, is approved for the treatment of ALK-positive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. After oral administration of single doses of brigatinib 30–240 mg, the median time to reach maximum plasma concentration ranged from 1 to 4 h. In patients with advanced malignancies, brigatinib showed dose linearity over the dose range of 60–240 mg once daily. A high-fat meal had no clinically meaningful effect on systemic exposures of brigatinib (area under the plasma concentration–time curve); thus, brigatinib can be administered with or without food. In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model with transit absorption compartments was found to adequately describe brigatinib pharmacokinetics. In addition, the population pharmacokinetic analyses showed that no dose adjustment is required based on body weight, age, race, sex, total bilirubin (< 1.5× upper limit of normal), and mild-to-moderate renal impairment. Data from dedicated phase I trials have indicated that no dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, while a dose reduction of approximately 40% (e.g., from 180 to 120 mg) is recommended for patients with severe hepatic impairment, and a reduction of approximately 50% (e.g., from 180 to 90 mg) is recommended when administering brigatinib to patients with severe renal impairment. Brigatinib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and results of clinical drug–drug interaction studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic analyses have demonstrated that coadministration of strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors or inducers with brigatinib should be avoided. If coadministration with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor cannot be avoided, the dose of brigatinib should be reduced by approximately 50% (strong CYP3A inhibitor) or approximately 40% (moderate CYP3A inhibitor), respectively. Brigatinib is a weak inducer of CYP3A in vivo; data from a phase I drug–drug interaction study showed that coadministration of brigatinib 180 mg once daily reduced the oral midazolam area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity by approximately 26%. Brigatinib did not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, or CYP2D6 at clinically relevant concentrations in vitro. Exposure–response analyses based on data from the ALTA (ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113) and ALTA-1L pivotal trials of brigatinib confirm the favorable benefit versus risk profile of the approved titration dosing regimen of 180 mg once daily (after a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg once daily). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Brigatinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This open-label, parallel-group study investigated the effect of chronic hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of brigatinib to inform dosing recommendations for these patients. Participants with hepatic impairment classified according to Child-Pugh categories of mild (A), moderate (B), or severe (C) and matched-healthy participants with normal hepatic function received a single oral dose of 90-mg brigatinib. Plasma samples were collected for the determination of brigatinib plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma PK parameters. Twenty-seven participants were enrolled (Child-Pugh A–C, n = 6 each; matched-healthy participants, n = 9). The mean fraction of free plasma brigatinib was comparable for the Child-Pugh A (11.1%), Child-Pugh B (10.8%), and healthy participant groups (8.5%); free brigatinib was higher in the Child-Pugh C group (23.1%). There were no clinically meaningful effects of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on unbound systemic exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of brigatinib (geometric least-squares mean ratios [90% CI] of 89.32% [69.79%–114.31%] and 99.55% [77.78%–127.41%], respectively). In the severe hepatic impairment group, brigatinib unbound AUC was approximately 37% higher (geometric least-squares mean ratio [90% CI] of 137.41% [107.37%–175.86%]) compared with healthy participants with normal hepatic function. Brigatinib was well tolerated in healthy participants and in participants with hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. The brigatinib dose should be reduced by approximately 40% for patients with severe hepatic impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, targets activated, mutant forms of ALK and overcomes mechanisms of resistance to the ALK inhibitors crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. Brigatinib is approved in multiple countries for treatment of patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. Based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, no dosage adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Methods An open-label, single-dose study was conducted to evaluate the PK of brigatinib (90 mg) in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 8) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 8). Plasma and urine were collected for the determination of plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma and urine PK parameters. Results Plasma protein binding of brigatinib was similar between patients with severe renal impairment (92 % bound) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (91 % bound). Unbound brigatinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) was approximately 92 % higher in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy volunteers with normal renal function. The renal clearance of brigatinib in patients with severe renal impairment was approximately 20 % of that observed in volunteers with normal renal function. Conclusions These findings support a brigatinib dosage reduction of approximately 50 % in patients with severe renal impairment. Trial registry: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: Brigatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in multiple countries for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. We report a population pharmacokinetic model-based analysis for brigatinib. Methods: Plasma concentration–time data were collected from 442 participants (105 healthy volunteers and 337 patients with cancer) who received single or multiple doses of oral brigatinib in one of five trials. Data were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM software version 7.3). Results: Brigatinib plasma concentrations were best described by a three-compartment model with a transit compartment input (number of transit compartments = 2.35; mean transit time = 0.9 h). The final model included albumin as a covariate on apparent clearance. None of the additional covariates examined, including sex, age, race, body weight, mild or moderate renal impairment, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase, were found to meaningfully explain variability in apparent clearance, suggesting that no dose adjustment is required based on these covariates. Conclusions: Results from these population pharmacokinetic analyses informed the prescribing guidance for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment in the US Prescribing Information and the European Summary of Product Characteristics for brigatinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bortezomib is a potent 20S proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. Despite the extensive clinical use of bortezomib, the mechanism of the complex time-dependent pharmacokinetics of bortezomib has not been fully investigated in context of its pharmacodynamics (PD) and drug–drug interaction (DDI) profiles. Here, we aimed to develop a mechanistic physiologically based (PB) PK/PD model to project PK, blood target inhibition and DDI of bortezomib in patients. A minimal PBPK/PD model consisting of six compartments was constructed using a bottom–up approach with pre-clinical data and human physiological parameters. Specifically, the target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) of bortezomib in red blood cells (RBC), which determines target inhibition in blood, was characterized by incorporating the proteasome binding affinity of bortezomib and the proteasome concentration in RBC. The hepatic clearance and fraction metabolized by different CYP isoforms were estimated from in vitro metabolism and phenotyping experiments. The established model adequately characterized the multi-exponential and time-dependent plasma pharmacokinetics, target binding and blood proteasome inhibition of bortezomib. Further, the model was able to accurately predict the impact of a strong CYP3A inducer (rifampicin) and inhibitor (ketoconazole) on bortezomib exposure. In conclusion, the mechanistic PBPK/PD model successfully described the complex pharmacokinetics, target inhibition and DDIs of bortezomib in patients. This study illustrates the importance of incorporating target biology, drug–target interactions and in vitro clearance parameters into mechanistic PBPK/PD models and the utility of such models for pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and DDI predictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor, approved in USA, Canada, Australia and Europe in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. We report a population pharmacokinetic model-based analysis for ixazomib that was pivotal in describing the clinical pharmacokinetics of ixazomib, to inform product labelling. Plasma concentration-time data were collected from 755 patients who received oral or intravenous ixazomib in once- or twice-weekly schedules in ten trials, including the global phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study. Data were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM software version 7.2, ICON Development Solutions, Hanover, MD, USA). Ixazomib plasma concentrations from intravenous and oral studies were described by a three-compartment model with linear distribution and elimination kinetics, including first-order linear absorption with a lag time describing the oral dose data. Body surface area on the volume of the second peripheral compartment was the only covariate included in the final model. None of the additional covariates tested including body surface area (1.2-2.7 m2), sex, age (23-91 years), race, mild/moderate renal impairment and mild hepatic impairment were found to impact systemic clearance, suggesting that no dose adjustment is required based on these covariates. The geometric mean terminal disposition phase half-life was 9.5 days, steady-state volume of distribution was 543 L and systemic clearance was 1.86 L/h. The absolute bioavailability of an oral dose was estimated to be 58%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib has been approved by regulatory authorities around the world, including in the United States and the European Union, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least one prior therapy, based on the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study.Objective: The objective of this study was to quantitatively characterize the benefit-risk profile of ixazomib in relapsed/refractory MM in support of the approved dose and schedule.Methods: We report early-phase study data and exposure-response analyses of TOURMALINE-MM1 data that support the selection of the recommended ixazomib dose and schedule.Results: Single-agent ixazomib studies showed a favorable efficacy/safety profile with weekly versus twice-weekly dosing; a phase I/II study of ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) identified a weekly ixazomib dose that offered an acceptable efficacy/safety profile. In IRd exposure-response analyses from TOURMALINE-MM1, ixazomib systemic exposure was not a significant predictor of progression-free survival or probability of response. Significant associations were observed between ixazomib exposure and the probability of grade ≥3 anemia and thrombocytopenia, and grade ≥2 diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, peripheral neuropathy, and rash. Additionally, higher ixazomib exposure was associated with lower lenalidomide relative dose intensity.Conclusions: These analyses support a favorable benefit-risk profile for weekly ixazomib 4.0 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles, which was selected for the phase III TOURMALINE registration program.Trial Registration Numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00932698, NCT00963820, NCT01217957, NCT01564537. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor, is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least one prior therapy. Ixazomib is a selective, potent, and reversible inhibitor of the 20S proteasome, and preferentially binds to and inhibits the β5 chymotrypsin-like proteolytic site. Ixazomib absorption is rapid, with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration of approximately 1 h post-dose. Ixazomib pharmacokinetics (PK) are adequately described by a three-compartment model (terminal half-life of 9.5 days) with first-order linear absorption (oral bioavailability of 58%). Plasma exposures of ixazomib increase in a dose-proportional manner. A high-fat meal decreases both the rate and extent of ixazomib absorption, supporting administration on an empty stomach. Population PK analyses demonstrated that no dose adjustment is required based on age, body size/weight, race, sex, mild-to-moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment. Results from dedicated studies indicate that a reduced starting dose (from 4 to 3 mg) is appropriate for patients with severe renal impairment, end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis, or moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment. Non-cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism appears to be the major clearance mechanism for ixazomib. Drug-drug interaction studies have shown no meaningful effects of strong inhibitors of CYP3A on ixazomib PK; however, the strong inducer rifampin caused a clinically relevant reduction in ixazomib exposure, supporting the recommendation to avoid concomitant administration of ixazomib with strong CYP3A inducers. Exposure-response analyses of data from the phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 registrational study demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile for the approved dose and regimen of weekly ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This metabolite profiling and identification analysis (part of a phase I absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion study) aimed to define biotransformation pathways and evaluate associated inter-individual variability in four patients with advanced solid tumors who received [14C]-ixazomib.Methods: After administration of a single 4.1-mg oral dose of [14C]-ixazomib (total radioactivity [TRA] ~ 500 nCi), plasma (at selected timepoints), urine, and fecal samples were collected before dosing and continuously over 0-168-h postdose, followed by intermittent collections on days 14, 21, 28, and 35. TRA analysis and metabolite profiling were performed using accelerator mass spectrometry. Radiolabeled metabolites were identified using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.Results: Metabolite profiles were similar in plasma, urine, and feces samples across the four patients analyzed. All metabolites identified were de-boronated. In AUC0-816 h time-proportional pooled plasma, ixazomib (54.2% of plasma TRA) and metabolites M1 (18.9%), M3 (10.6%), and M2 (7.91%), were the primary components identified. M1 was the major metabolite, contributing to 31.1% of the 76.2% of the total dose excreted in urine and feces over 0-35-day postdose. As none of the identified metabolites had a boronic acid moiety, they are unlikely to be pharmacologically active.Conclusions: Hydrolytic metabolism in conjunction with oxidative deboronation appears to be the principal process in the in vivo biotransformation pathways of ixazomib. The inference of formation-rate-limited clearance of ixazomib metabolites and the inferred lack of pharmacologic activity of identified circulating metabolites provides justification for use of parent drug concentrations/systemic exposure in clinical pharmacology analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This phase I study investigated bortezomib in solid tumors used as a daily subcutaneous regimen. Previous regimens showed only modest activity in solid tumors which was potentially related to sub-optimal tumor penetration. We aimed at exploring if daily low dose administration of bortezomib may allow a greater and tolerable pharmacokinetic exposure which might be required for antitumor activity in solid tumors. Patients and methods This 3 + 3 design, dose escalation, monocentric study aimed at defining the maximum tolerated dose of daily low dose schedule of bortezomib. Tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antitumor activity, biomarkers for proteasome inhibition, pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were also evaluated. Results A total of eighteen patients were dosed in 3 bortezomib cohorts (0.5, 0.6 and 0.7 mg/m2), with 3, 11 and 4 patients respectively. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities: Grade (G) 3 Sweet's syndrome (at 0.6 mg/m2), G3 asthenia and anorexia or ataxia (2 patients at 0.7 mg/m2). The most common study drug-related adverse events (all grades) were thrombocytopenia (72%), fatigue (56%), neuropathy (50%), anorexia (44%) and rash (39%). Dose 0.6 mg/m2 of bortezomib was considered as the recommended phase II dose. A significant tumor shrinkage (−36% according to WHO criteria) was observed in one patient with heavily pre-treated GIST, and 2 minor responses (−20%) were recorded in two patients with melanoma and mesothelioma. Conclusion This daily subcutaneous regimen of bortezomib showed a dose dependent plasma exposure, evidence of target inhibition and preliminary signs of clinical activity. However, cumulative neurological toxicity of this dose-dense daily regimen might preclude its further clinical development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This two-part, phase I study evaluated the mass balance, excretion, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of ixazomib in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Part A of the study, patients received a single 4.1 mg oral solution dose of [14C]-ixazomib containing ~500 nCi total radioactivity (TRA), followed by non-radiolabeled ixazomib (4 mg capsule) on days 14 and 21 of the 35-day PK cycle. Patients were confined to the clinic for the first 168 h post dose and returned for 24 h overnight clinic visits on days 14, 21, 28, and 35. Blood, urine, and fecal samples were collected during Part A to assess the mass balance (by accelerator mass spectrometry), excretion, and PK of ixazomib. During Part B of the study, patients received non-radiolabeled ixazomib (4 mg capsules) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. After oral administration, ixazomib was rapidly absorbed with a median plasma Tmax of 0.5 h and represented 70% of total drug-related material in plasma. The mean total recovery of administered TRA was 83.9%; 62.1% in urine and 21.8% in feces. Only 3.23% of the administered dose was recovered in urine as unchanged drug up to 168 h post dose, suggesting that most of the TRA in urine was attributable to metabolites. All patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event, which most commonly involved the gastrointestinal system. These findings suggest that ixazomib is extensively metabolized, with urine representing the predominant route of excretion of drug-related material.Trial ID: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01953783. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of obesity has dramatically increased in recent years and now includes a significant proportion of the world's children, adolescents and adults. Obesity is linked to a number of co-morbidities, the most prominent being type 2 diabetes mellitus. While many agents are available to treat these conditions, the current knowledge regarding their disposition in the obese remains limited. Over the years, both direct and indirect methodologies have been utilized to assess body composition. Commonly used direct measures include underwater weighing, skinfold measurement, bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Unfortunately, these methods are not readily available to the majority of clinicians. As a result, a number of indirect measures to assess body composition have been developed. Indirect measures rely on patient attributes such as height, bodyweight and sex. These size metrics are often utilized clinically and include body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), ideal bodyweight (IBW), percent IBW, adjusted bodyweight, lean bodyweight (LBW) and predicted normal weight (PNWT). An understanding of how the volume of distribution (Vd) of a drug changes in the obese is critical, as this parameter determines loading-dose selection. The Vd of a drug is dependent upon its physiochemical properties, the degree of plasma protein binding and tissue blood flow. Obesity does not appear to have an impact on drug binding to albumin; however, data regarding α1-acid glycoprotein binding have been contradictory. A reduction in tissue blood flow and alterations in cardiac structure and function have been noted in obese individuals. At the present time, a universal size descriptor to describe the Vd of all drugs in obese and lean individuals does not exist. Drug clearance (CL) is the primary determinant to consider when designing a maintenance dose regimen. CL is largely controlled by hepatic and renal physiology. In the obese, increases in cytochrome P450 2E1 activity and phase II conjugation activity have been observed. The effects of obesity on renal tubular secretion, tubular reabsorption, and glomerular filtration have not been fully elucidated. As with the Vd, a single, well validated size metric to characterize drug CL in the obese does not currently exist. Therefore, clinicians should apply a weight-normalized maintenance dose, using a size descriptor that corrects for differences in absolute CL between obese and non-obese individuals. The elimination half-life (t½) of a drug depends on both the Vd and CL. Since the Vd and CL are biologically independent entities, changes in the t½ of a drug in obese individuals can reflect changes in the Vd, the CL, or both. This review also examines recent publications that investigated the disposition of several classes of drugs in the obese - antibacterials, anticoagulants, antidiabetics, anticancer agents and neuromuscular blockers. In conclusion, pharmacokinetic data in obese patients do not exist for the majority of drugs. In situations where such information is available, clinicians should design treatment regimens that account for any significant differences in the CL and Vd in the obese. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tissue culture preparations of adult and neonatal rat pituitary neural lobes were examined by use of cell-type specific immunohistochemical markers. Cultures obtained from explanted or dissociated adult tissue or explanted neonatal tissue produced cells immunoreactive for endothelial and fibroblast markers. In contrast, dissociated neonatal tissue produced, in addition, two distinct forms of astrocytic glial cells immunoreactive for glial fibrillary acidic protein, one of which was also immunoreactive for the ganglioside GD3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comments on a study by Nishimoto et al published in `Nature,' 3/4/93, which proposes that the beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) is a neuronal receptor regulating the heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein, Go. Alzheimer's disease; Insulin-like growth factor (IGF); Suggestion that a sequence present in the cytoplasmic domain of APP might activate a trimeric G protein; Further details.