Search

Exploring efficient and easily implementable prenatal screening strategies aims at birth defect prevention and control. However, there have been limited economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) strategies in China. Furthermore, these studies were predominantly confined to local or geographically proximate provinces and lacked universality and representativeness. This study assesses the health economics of current prenatal screening strategies and NIPS as first-line screening programs, analyzing their efficacy to determine an optimal strategy. From the perspective of health economics, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and single-factor sensitivity were conducted for five different screening strategies using a decision tree model. Among pregnant women aged < 35 years who underwent only one screening for foetal Down syndrome (DS), the detection rate, false positive rate and positive predictive value of NIPS for foetuses with DS were superior to those of the other four serological screening methods. Although applying NIPS as first-line screening method yields the highest efficacy and benefits, it currently lacks cost-effectiveness when compared to serological screening and sequential NIPS screening strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To discuss combinations of traditional screening and noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and to compare which traditional screening is the most suitable first-line screening approach to NIPS, pregnant women were recruited in this retrospective observational study. Pregnant women underwent one of four traditional screening tests. The 9 contingent models were combined by high risk cut-offs of 1:50, 1:100, 1:270 and intermediate risk cut-offs of 1:1000, 1:1500, 1:2000. We analyzed cost and performance of various screening models with contingent screening of different risk cut-offs. Compared with other screening tests, combined first-trimester screening (CFTS) had the lowest proportion of high risk (≥1:270) with the highest detection rate (DR) (78.79%) and the lowest proportion of intermediate risk (1:271~1:1000). When intermediate risk was 1:51 ~1:1500, CFTS as first-line screening had the lowest cost with DR of 93.94%. Other screening tests as the first-line screening with intermediate risk of 1:51~1:1000 had the lowest cost, there DR were 90.91%, 84.62%, 91.67%, respectively. Our study demonstrated if only one traditional screening was allowed to screen pregnant women, CFTS was recommended as the first choice. According to local health and economic conditions, adopting appropriate traditional screening with suitable cut-offs as first-line screening will contributed to a cost-effective screening model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to establish suitable threshold values for biochemical indicators in low-risk pregnant women who underwent second trimester screening and design strategies for consecutive prenatal testing to increase trisomy 21 detection.This study examined singleton pregnant women who underwent double, triple, or quadruple screening in the second trimester over six years. To obtain adequate detection efficiency for low-risk pregnancies, threshold values for serum biochemical indicators were established, and a cost-effectiveness assessment of the improved contingent screening strategy was conducted.Participants were included in serum double- (n = 88,550), triple- (n = 29,991), and quadruple-screening (n = 15,004) groups. Threshold values were defined as having a free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG) multiple of the median (MoM) ≥ 2.50, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) MoM ≤ 0.50, or unconjugated estriol (uE3) MoM ≤ 0.70 for low risk. Low-risk pregnancies, comprising 1.35% (988/73,183), 4.45% (1,171/26,286), and 11.91% (1,559/13,085) of the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, respectively, underwent further non-invasive prenatal screening. In the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, we detected 11.76% (2/17), 40.00% (2/5), and 66.67% (2/3) of trisomy 21 cases with false negative results, respectively, with the overall detection rates of 85.00% (85/100), 90.63% (29/32), and 95.24% (20/21), respectively, and decreased ratio of overall costs of 5.26%, 16.63%, and 24.36%, respectively.Utilizing threshold values of AFP, free β-hCG, and uE3 to trigger further non-invasive prenatal screening may increase trisomy 21 detection in pregnancies deemed low risk in the second trimester while reducing the overall costs of screening strategies.Methods: This study aimed to establish suitable threshold values for biochemical indicators in low-risk pregnant women who underwent second trimester screening and design strategies for consecutive prenatal testing to increase trisomy 21 detection.This study examined singleton pregnant women who underwent double, triple, or quadruple screening in the second trimester over six years. To obtain adequate detection efficiency for low-risk pregnancies, threshold values for serum biochemical indicators were established, and a cost-effectiveness assessment of the improved contingent screening strategy was conducted.Participants were included in serum double- (n = 88,550), triple- (n = 29,991), and quadruple-screening (n = 15,004) groups. Threshold values were defined as having a free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG) multiple of the median (MoM) ≥ 2.50, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) MoM ≤ 0.50, or unconjugated estriol (uE3) MoM ≤ 0.70 for low risk. Low-risk pregnancies, comprising 1.35% (988/73,183), 4.45% (1,171/26,286), and 11.91% (1,559/13,085) of the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, respectively, underwent further non-invasive prenatal screening. In the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, we detected 11.76% (2/17), 40.00% (2/5), and 66.67% (2/3) of trisomy 21 cases with false negative results, respectively, with the overall detection rates of 85.00% (85/100), 90.63% (29/32), and 95.24% (20/21), respectively, and decreased ratio of overall costs of 5.26%, 16.63%, and 24.36%, respectively.Utilizing threshold values of AFP, free β-hCG, and uE3 to trigger further non-invasive prenatal screening may increase trisomy 21 detection in pregnancies deemed low risk in the second trimester while reducing the overall costs of screening strategies.Results: This study aimed to establish suitable threshold values for biochemical indicators in low-risk pregnant women who underwent second trimester screening and design strategies for consecutive prenatal testing to increase trisomy 21 detection.This study examined singleton pregnant women who underwent double, triple, or quadruple screening in the second trimester over six years. To obtain adequate detection efficiency for low-risk pregnancies, threshold values for serum biochemical indicators were established, and a cost-effectiveness assessment of the improved contingent screening strategy was conducted.Participants were included in serum double- (n = 88,550), triple- (n = 29,991), and quadruple-screening (n = 15,004) groups. Threshold values were defined as having a free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG) multiple of the median (MoM) ≥ 2.50, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) MoM ≤ 0.50, or unconjugated estriol (uE3) MoM ≤ 0.70 for low risk. Low-risk pregnancies, comprising 1.35% (988/73,183), 4.45% (1,171/26,286), and 11.91% (1,559/13,085) of the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, respectively, underwent further non-invasive prenatal screening. In the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, we detected 11.76% (2/17), 40.00% (2/5), and 66.67% (2/3) of trisomy 21 cases with false negative results, respectively, with the overall detection rates of 85.00% (85/100), 90.63% (29/32), and 95.24% (20/21), respectively, and decreased ratio of overall costs of 5.26%, 16.63%, and 24.36%, respectively.Utilizing threshold values of AFP, free β-hCG, and uE3 to trigger further non-invasive prenatal screening may increase trisomy 21 detection in pregnancies deemed low risk in the second trimester while reducing the overall costs of screening strategies.Conclusion: This study aimed to establish suitable threshold values for biochemical indicators in low-risk pregnant women who underwent second trimester screening and design strategies for consecutive prenatal testing to increase trisomy 21 detection.This study examined singleton pregnant women who underwent double, triple, or quadruple screening in the second trimester over six years. To obtain adequate detection efficiency for low-risk pregnancies, threshold values for serum biochemical indicators were established, and a cost-effectiveness assessment of the improved contingent screening strategy was conducted.Participants were included in serum double- (n = 88,550), triple- (n = 29,991), and quadruple-screening (n = 15,004) groups. Threshold values were defined as having a free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG) multiple of the median (MoM) ≥ 2.50, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) MoM ≤ 0.50, or unconjugated estriol (uE3) MoM ≤ 0.70 for low risk. Low-risk pregnancies, comprising 1.35% (988/73,183), 4.45% (1,171/26,286), and 11.91% (1,559/13,085) of the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, respectively, underwent further non-invasive prenatal screening. In the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, we detected 11.76% (2/17), 40.00% (2/5), and 66.67% (2/3) of trisomy 21 cases with false negative results, respectively, with the overall detection rates of 85.00% (85/100), 90.63% (29/32), and 95.24% (20/21), respectively, and decreased ratio of overall costs of 5.26%, 16.63%, and 24.36%, respectively.Utilizing threshold values of AFP, free β-hCG, and uE3 to trigger further non-invasive prenatal screening may increase trisomy 21 detection in pregnancies deemed low risk in the second trimester while reducing the overall costs of screening strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]