Search

Older adults demonstrate impairments in navigation that cannot be explained by general cognitive and motor declines. Previous work has shown that older adults may combine sensory cues during navigation differently than younger adults, though this work has largely been done in dark environments where sensory integration may differ from full-cue environments. Here, we test whether aging adults optimally combine cues from two sensory systems critical for navigation: vision (landmarks) and body-based self-motion cues. Participants completed a homing (triangle completion) task using immersive virtual reality to offer the ability to navigate in a well-lit environment including visibility of the ground plane. An optimal model, based on principles of maximum-likelihood estimation, predicts that precision in homing should increase with multisensory information in a manner consistent with each individual sensory cue's perceived reliability (measured by variability). We found that well-aging adults (with normal or corrected-to-normal sensory acuity and active lifestyles) were more variable and less accurate than younger adults during navigation. Both older and younger adults relied more on their visual systems than a maximum likelihood estimation model would suggest. Overall, younger adults' visual weighting matched the model's predictions whereas older adults showed sub-optimal sensory weighting. In addition, high inter-individual differences were seen in both younger and older adults. These results suggest that older adults do not optimally weight each sensory system when combined during navigation, and that older adults may benefit from interventions that help them recalibrate the combination of visual and self-motion cues for navigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the effects of engaging in extemporaneous speech in healthy young adults while they walked in a virtual environment meant to elicit low or high levels of mobility-related anxiety. We expected that mobility-related anxiety imposed by a simulated balance threat (i.e., virtual elevation) would impair walking behavior and lead to greater dual-task costs. Altogether, 15 adults (age = 25.6 ± 4.7 yrs, 7 women) walked at their self-selected speed within a VR environment that simulated a low (ground) and high elevation (15 m) setting while speaking extemporaneously (dual-task) or not speaking (single-task). Likert-scale ratings of cognitive and somatic anxiety, confidence, and mental effort were evaluated and gait speed, step length, and step width, as well as the variability of each, was calculated for every trial. Silent speech pauses (> 150 ms) were determined from audio recordings to infer the cognitive costs of extemporaneous speech planning at low and high virtual elevation. Results indicated that the presence of a balance threat and the inclusion of a concurrent speech task both perturbed gait kinematics, but the virtual height illusion led to increased anxiety and mental effort and a decrease in confidence. The extemporaneous speech pauses were longer on average when walking, but no effects of virtual elevation were reported. Trends toward interaction effects arose in self-reported responses, with participants reporting more comfort walking at virtual heights if they engaged in extemporaneous speech. Walking at virtual elevation and while talking may have independent and significant effects on gait; both effects were robust and did not support an interaction when combined (i.e., walking and talking at virtual heights). The nature of extemporaneous speech may have distracted participants from the detrimental effects of walking in anxiety-inducing settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Older adults who report a fear of falling are more likely to subsequently fall, yet, some gait anxiety-related alterations may protect balance. We examined the effect of age on walking in anxiety-inducing virtual reality (VR) settings. We predicted a high elevation-related postural threat would impair gait in older age, and differences in cognitive and physical function would relate to the observed effects. Altogether, 24 adults (age (y) = 49.2 (18.7), 13 women) walked on a 2.2-m walkway at self-selected and fast speeds at low (ground) and high (15 m) VR elevation. Self-reported cognitive and somatic anxiety and mental effort were greater at high elevations (all p < 0.001), but age- and speed-related effects were not observed. At high VR elevations, participants walked slower, took shorter steps, and reduced turning speed (all p < 0.001). Significant interactions with age in gait speed and step length showed that relatively older adults walked slower (β = − 0.05, p = 0.024) and took shorter steps (β = − 0.05, p = 0.001) at self-selected speeds at high compared to low elevation settings. The effect of Age on gait speed and step length disappeared between self-selected and fast speeds and at high elevation. At self-selected speeds, older adults took shorter and slower steps at high elevation without changing step width, suggesting that in threatening settings relatively older people change gait parameters to promote stability. At fast speeds, older adults walked like relatively younger adults (or young adults walked like older adults) supporting the notion that people opt to walk faster in a way that still protects balance and stability in threatening settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Concussion commonly results in exercise intolerance, often limiting return to activities. Improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms of post-concussive exercise intolerance could help guide mechanism-directed rehabilitation approaches. Signs of altered cardiovascular autonomic regulation—a potential contributor to exercise intolerance—have been reported following concussion, although it is not clear how these findings inform underlying mechanisms of post-concussive symptoms. Systematic summarization and synthesis of prior work is needed to best understand current evidence, allowing identification of common themes and gaps requiring further study. The purpose of this review was to (1) summarize published data linking exercise intolerance to autonomic dysfunction, and (2) summarize key findings, highlighting opportunities for future investigation. Methods: The protocol was developed a priori, and conducted in five stages; results were collated, summarized, and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies including injuries classified as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)/concussion, regardless of mechanism of injury, were included. Studies were required to include both autonomic and exercise intolerance testing. Exclusion criteria included confounding central or peripheral nervous system dysfunction beyond those stemming from the concussion, animal model studies, and case reports. Results: A total of 3116 publications were screened; 17 were included in the final review. Conclusion: There was wide variability in approach to autonomic/exercise tolerance testing, as well as inclusion criteria/testing timelines, which limited comparisons across studies. The reviewed studies support current clinical suspicion of autonomic dysfunction as an important component of exercise intolerance. However, the specific mechanisms of impairment and relationship to symptoms and recovery require additional investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anxiogenic settings lead to reduced postural sway while standing, but anxiety-related balance may be influenced by the location of postural threat in the environment. We predicted that the direction of threat would elicit a parallel controlled manifold relative to the standing surface, and an orthogonal uncontrolled manifold during standing. Altogether, 14 healthy participants (8 women, mean age = 27.5 years, SD = 8.2) wore a virtual reality (VR) headset and stood on a matched real-world walkway (2 m × 40 cm × 2 cm) for 30 s at ground level and simulated heights (elevated 15 m) in two positions: (1) parallel to walkway, lateral threat; and (2) perpendicular to walkway, anteroposterior threat. Inertial sensors measured postural sway acceleration (e.g., 95% ellipse, root mean square (RMS) of acceleration), and a wrist-worn monitor measured heart rate coefficient of variation (HR CV). Fully factorial linear-mixed effect regressions (LMER) determined the effects of height and position. HR CV moderately increased from low to high height (p = 0.050, g = 0.397). The Height × Position interaction approached significance for sway area (95% ellipse; β = − 0.018, p = 0.062) and was significant for RMS (β = − 0.022, p = 0.007). Post-hoc analyses revealed that sagittal plane sway accelerations and RMS increased from low to high elevation in parallel standing, but were limited when facing the threat during perpendicular standing. Postural response to threat varies depending on the direction of threat, suggesting that the control strategies used during standing are sensitive to the direction of threat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]