Search

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) always occur during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients with nervous system cancer (NSC) may gain clinical benefit from ICIs, but irAEs in NSC patients are rarely examined. Therefore, our study systematically summarized reports of irAEs in NSC. Methods: We obtained information from the FDA adverse event reporting system from the first quarter (Q1) of 2013 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2022. We examined use of a combination of ICIs and chemotherapy (ICI_Chemo) or chemotherapy only (ICI_Chemo) for patients with NSC. Multiple disproportionality analyses were applied to assess irAEs. Multiomics data from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database were analyzed to explore potential molecular mechanisms associated with irAEs in NSC patients. Results: Fourteen irAEs were identified in 8,357 NSC patients after removing duplicates; the top five events were seizure, confused state, encephalopathy, muscular weakness and gait disturbance. Older patients were more likely to develop irAEs than were younger patients. From the start of ICIs_Chemo to irAE occurrence, there was a significant difference in the time to onset of irAEs between age groups. irAEs may occur via mechanisms involving the inflammatory response, secretion of inflammatory mediators, and aberrant activation of pathologic pathways. Conclusions: This study helps to characterize irAEs in NSC patients treated with ICIs. We combined GEO database analysis to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of irAEs. The results of this study provide a basis for improving the toxic effects of ICIs in NSC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate the association between sacubitril/valsartan and dementia-related adverse events (AEs) in geographical subpopulations using subgroup disproportionality analysis. Cases from the FDA adverse event reporting system involving patients aged 60 or older with sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were analyzed. The adjusted reporting odds ratios (RORs) for dementia-related AEs were calculated for each continent. A total of 61,518 AEs associated with sacubitril/valsartan or ARBs were identified. Among these, 1441 were dementia-related AEs. In Asia, Europe, and Africa, the reporting risk of dementia-related AEs associated with sacubitril/valsartan was lower compared to ARBs (adjusted ROR, 0.57 [95% CI 0.31–1.01]; adjusted ROR, 0.89 [95% CI 0.69–1.14]; adjusted ROR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.27–0.61], respectively). In Latin America and Oceania, the reporting risk of dementia-related AEs associated with sacubitril/valsartan was similar to that associated with ARBs (adjusted ROR, 1.04 [95% CI 0.75–1.44]; adjusted ROR, 1.02 [95% CI 0.31–3.37], respectively). On the contrary, in North America, the reporting risk associated with sacubitril/valsartan was higher compared to ARBs (adjusted ROR, 1.29 [95% CI 1.10–1.53]). Although the ROR value did not meet the criteria for signal detection, the significantly greater than 1 ROR observed in North America suggests that caution may be warranted regarding potential dementia-related adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is widely utilized as a second-line and subsequent treatment for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer and has shown promise in early breast cancer treatment, particularly in adjuvant settings for residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, concerns have arisen regarding long-term hepatic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not identified in clinical trials. We investigated potential safety signals of T-DM1 in hepatobiliary disorders and the time-to-onset of ADRs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Suspected ADRs were extracted and divided into two groups: T-DM1 (N = 3387) and other drugs (N = 11,833,701). Potential signal for T-DM1 in hepatobiliary disorder were identified (reporting odds ratio [ROR] = 5.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.11–6.27; information component [IC] = 2.35, 95% Credibility Interval [Crl] = 2.18–2.51). A breast cancer indicated subgroup analysis (2519 T-DM1; 172,329 other drugs) also identified a potential safety signal (ROR = 3.28, 95% CI = 2.92–3.68; IC = 1.53, 95%CrI = 1.35–1.71). The median time-to-onset for T-DM1-associated hepatobiliary disorders was 41 days. For prolonged and chronic hepatobiliary disorders, median times were 322.5 and 301.5 days, respectively. These findings highlight the need for further research to inform clinical decisions on optimal T-DM1 treatment duration, balancing benefits with potential adverse reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: No head-to-head clinical trials have compared the differences in adverse events (AEs) between nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO-IPI) and nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NIVO-CABO) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Aim: We analysed the two largest real-world databases, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the World Health Organization's VigiBase, to elucidate the differences in AEs between NIVO-IPI and NIVO-CABO. Method: In total, 40,376 and 38,022 records were extracted from FAERS and VigiBase, and 193 AEs were analysed. The reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated using a disproportionality analysis (NIVO-CABO/NIVO-IPI). Results: The reported numbers of immune-related AEs, including myocarditis, colitis, and hepatitis, were significantly higher with NIVO-IPI (ROR = 0.18 for FAERS and 0.13 for VigiBase). Contrarily, the reported numbers of other AEs, including gastrointestinal disorders (ROR = 2.68 and 2.92) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (ROR = 2.94 and 3.55), considered to be potentiated by the combination of NIVO and CABO, were higher with NIVO-CABO. Conclusion: Our findings contribute to the selection and clinical management of NIVO-IPI and NIVO-CABO, which minimizes the risk of AEs for individual patients with mRCC by considering distinctive differences in the AE profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan showed a significant reduction in mortality and hospitalization for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Despite proven efficacy, sacubitril/valsartan has moderate uptake in clinical practice. This study explores the safety profile of sacubitril/valsartan by comparing adverse events in RCT and real-world use. Methods: We studied hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema associated with sacubitril/valsartan in RCTs and pharmacovigilance databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with six RCTs investigating sacubitril/valsartan vs. control/comparators in heart failure patients. WHO's VigiBase, FAERS, and EMA's EudraVigilance were mined to obtain spontaneously reported real-world adverse events. Disproportionality analysis was performed with the FDA's OpenVigil 2.0. Results: Six RCTs enrolled 15,538 patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fractions. There was no statistical difference for the composite of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema between sacubitril/valsartan and its comparators viz. ACEi or ARBs (OR 1.23, CI 0.98–1.56; p = 0.08). A total of 103,038 adverse events were registered in the spontaneous reporting systems. Hypotension was the most reported adverse event. Proportions of composite adverse events were 20% in VigiBase, 17% in FAERS, and 39% with EudraVigilance. Disproportionality analysis showed a lower risk of adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan than other guideline-directed heart failure medications used in clinical practice. Conclusion: With increased uptake of sacubitril/valsartan, risks of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema appear low and acceptable in RCTs and global clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran are non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that are widely used for treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Objective To estimate and compare hemorrhagic events report of rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran. Setting FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to assess the signal of hemorrhagic events of different NOACs. Main outcome measure The overall hemorrhagic events and hemorrhagic events in different physiological systems. Results From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019, the total number of reports of hemorrhage related to rivaroxaban was 53,085, and the numbers of apixaban and dabigatran were 13,151 and 14,100 respectively. The overall ROR (95% CI) of hemorrhagic events reporting for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran and apixaban versus dabigatran were 1.58 (1.54–1.62) and 0.47 (0.46–0.48) respectively. The ROR (95% CI) for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran in gastrointestinal system, nervous system, renal and urinary system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and eye system was 1.38 (1.34–1.42), 0.94 (0.90–0.98), 1.07 (1.01–1.13), 0.80 (0.70–0.90), and 1.38 (1.19–1.60) respectively. The RORs (95% CI) for apixaban versus dabigatran in gastrointestinal system, nervous system, renal and urinary system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and eye system were 0.28 (0.27–0.29), 0.69 (0.66–0.73), 0.31 (0.29–0.34), 0.98 (0.86–1.12), and 1.18 (1.00–1.39), respectively. Conclusions Overall, we found a moderate signal of higher frequency of reporting hemorrhage in rivaroxban compared with dabigatran and decreased hemorrhagic event reporting in apixaban compared with dabigatran. While this potential signal has not been confirmed in clinical trials or observational studies, in clinical practice, attention should be paid to the risk of potential hemorrhage when the patients switch from apixaban to dabigatran or rivaroxban. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Signal generation through data mining algorithms is an innovative and emerging field in pharmacovigilance. Early detection of safety signals is important for public health safety. However, the possibility of generating pseudo signals should not be overlooked. Objective Our study aimed to identify potential signals of aromatase inhibitors associated Osteonecrosis of Jaw and assess the possibilities of the safety signal to be a pseudo signal/false positive in FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Setting Spontaneously reported data in FAERS database. Methods Data for this study were obtained from the public release of data in FAERS. OpenVigil, a pharmacovigilance analytical tool was used to access FAERS data. Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) was used to assess the relation between the drug and adverse event. A value of ROR-1.96SE  > 1, (SE-standard error) was considered positive. Main outcome measure Signal strength. Results FAERS database had a total of 15,178 reports for Osteonecrosis of Jaw. Amongst which 617 reports were associated with aromatase inhibitors. Signal strength ROR (lower bound of the 95% CI) for letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane associated Osteonecrosis of Jaw without any background correction was 8.34, 6.64 and 15.14 respectively. Upon removing the reports of concomitantly administered drugs (bisphosphonates and denosumab), signal strength drastically decreased to 0.03, 0.36 and 0.47 for letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane respectively. The signal strength of bisphosphonates and denosumab associated Osteonecrosis of Jaw was not changed significantly upon removal of aromatase inhibitors. Conclusion Our study concluded that the signal generated for aromatase inhibitors associated Osteonecrosis of Jaw in FAERS database can be false positive. Careful background corrections with identification of those risk factors are imperative to exclude false positive results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Ifosfamide is extensively used to treat several malignant conditions. Administration of ifosfamide can cause encephalopathy and other neurotoxic effects. The aim of this study was to obtain novel information on the onset profiles of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy (IIE) considering other associated clinical factors using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) databases.Methods: We analyzed the reports of encephalopathy between 2004 and 2018 from the FAERS and JADER databases. To define IIE, we used the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms and standardized queries. The reporting odds ratios (ROR) at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to detect the signal for IIE and adjusted for covariates using a multivariate logistic regression technique. We evaluated the time-to-onset profile of IIE and used the association rule mining technique to discover undetected associations, such as potential risk factors.Results: In the FAERS database, the ROR (CI) for encephalopathy (preferred term, PT) and encephalopathy (standardized MedDRA queries, SMQ) was 56.58 (51.69-61.93) and 1.57 (1.48-1.67), respectively. In the JADER database, the ROR (95% CI) for encephalopathy (PT) and encephalopathy (SMQ) was 13.54 (9.91-18.50) and 1.24 (1.01-1.53), respectively. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant contribution in IIE signal in the ≥ 60 year group (p = 0.00094; vs. < 60 year group) and ≥ 2000 mg/m2 dosage group (p = 0.00045; vs. < 2000 mg/m2 dosage group). The association rules of {ifosfamide, aprepitant} → {encephalopathy (SMQ)} demonstrated high lift values. The average dose of ifosfamide in patients with encephalopathy (PT) and without encephalopathy (PT) was 2022.8 ± 592.8 (mean ± standard deviation) and 1568.5 ± 703.2 mg/m2, respectively (p < 0.05). Encephalopathy within the first 7 days of ifosfamide administration was 94.1% for encephalopathy (PT) and 87.7% for encephalopathy (SMQ), respectively.Conclusions: The present analysis demonstrated that the incidence of encephalopathy with ifosfamide should be closely monitored for a short onset (within 7 days). The patients who are administered a high dose of ifosfamide or co-administrated aprepitant should be carefully monitored for the development of encephalopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As of 2014, the US FDA was considering policy options to promote accurate attribution of adverse events for biosimilars. In order to assess the identification and traceability of biologics from multiple sources, Tufts University’s Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted a study reviewing the current FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for reports related to insulin and growth hormone products. Methods: For this study, all primary suspect reports that were received by FAERS for human growth hormone (hGH) and human insulin between the fourth quarter of 2005 and the third quarter of 2013 were extracted and analyzed. Results: The rates of “accurate” brand (ie, identifiable) drug names were generally high, with a higher incidence for hGH drugs than for insulin drugs (92% of hGH primary suspect reports vs 84% of insulin primary suspect reports). Lot number completion rates were generally low, with a higher incidence for insulin drugs than for hGH drugs (37% of insulin primary suspect reports vs 13% of hGH primary suspect reports). There were 13.5% of insulin reports that could not be linked to manufacturers, while 7.5% of hGH reports could not be linked to a manufacturer. Conclusions: The completion and accuracy rates of FAERS data on biologics observed in this study are consistent with those observed in earlier studies and suggest that traceability in adverse event reports can be improved through more consistent use of brand names or other product specific identifiers and through more frequent inclusion of lot numbers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]