Background, aim, and scope At the request of the Public Waste Agency for the Flemish Region, the Flemish Institute for Technological Research performed a life cycle assessment (LCA), according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14040 procedures (ISO 1997, 1998, 2000, and ISO 2006), followed by an eco-efficiency analysis of four alternative types of drinking cups for use at public events. The results of the LCA study served as input for the eco-efficiency analysis in which the costs related to the four cup systems were studied and combined with the environmental impacts. The objective of this study was to gain insight into the current environmental impacts and costs related to existing systems for drinking cups at public events in Flanders (Belgium) in order to outline a well-founded policy with regard to this subject. Since the results of this comparative study are publicly available, a critical review was performed according to ISO 14040 (review by interested parties, using a review panel) after each stage (goal and scope, data inventory, impact analysis/ interpretation, eco-efficiency analysis) during the study. Methodology Four types of cups were analysed; the reusable polycarbonate cup (PC), the one-way polypropylene cup (PP), the one-way PE-coated cardboard cup and the one-way polylactide cup (PLA). The functional unit is defined as 'the recipients needed to serve 100 l of beer or soft drinks at a small-scale indoor respectively a large-scale outdoor event'. This definition included the production of the cups, the consumption stage (at the event) and the processing of the waste. The data inventory focused on specific data supplied by different stakeholders in Flanders (and Belgium). Based on data collected for specific events, an average typical small indoor and large outdoor event was defined, respectively. One important aspect in this context was the trip rate for the reusable cups, meaning the average number of times one cup can be used before disposal. Based on practical experiences combined with literature research, a trip rate was defined for small- and large-scale events, respectively. Since this factor was very important but also very open for debate, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the trip rate. The impact analysis was based on the Eco-Indicator 99 methodology (Hierarchist version H/A; Goedkoop and Spriensma 2000). The main reason for using this methodology was that it allows the calculation of one weighted environmental indicator for each alternative, which was needed as input for the eco-efficiency analysis. The cost indicator, which was based on similar system boundaries and assumptions as the environmental indicator, was calculated from a societal perspective. Both indicators were combined in an eco-efficiency portfolio, with the average in the centre point and the number of standard deviations indicated on the axes. Results and discussion For the environmental profile of the individual cup systems, the total life cycle of the cups was divided in different life cycle stages.… [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]