Search

A key distinguishing factor between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD) lies in the notable decrease in functioning due to cognitive impairment. The Parkinson's Disease-Cognitive Functional Rating Scale (PD-CRFS) was developed to assess functional limitations caused by cognitive impairment, while reducing the influence of motor impairment. The aim of this multicenter study was to (i) validate the Italian version of the PD-CFRS in PD, (ii) determine optimal cut-off scores for detecting MCI and dementia in PD, (iii) compare its performances with the most established functional assessment tool (IADL). Six hundred and sixty nine PD participants were recruited from 4 Italian Movement Disorders centers (Venice, Milan, Gravedona, and Salerno). They underwent Level-II cognitive evaluation, which resulted in 282 PD-NC, 310 PD-MCI, and 77 PDD. The PD-CFRS's psychometric and clinimetric properties, applicability, and responsiveness were analyzed. The PD-CFRS showed high acceptability. Floor and ceiling effects were acceptable. It also displayed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.738), and test–retest reliability (ICC =.854). The PD-CFRS demonstrated higher coefficient of variation to detect dysfunction in PD-MCI patients in comparison to the IADL scale (PD-CFRS 96% vs IADL 22.5%). Convergent validity with the IADL was r = − 0.638 and − 0.527 in males and females, respectively. PD-CFRS total score negatively correlated with global cognition (MoCA corrected score r = − 0.61; p < 0.001). A cut-off score > 6.5 identified PDD with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 88% (AUC =.959). A cut-off value of > 1 detected PD-MCI with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 69% (AUC =.695). The Italian version of the PD-CFRS demonstrated to be an easy, valid and reliable tool that properly captures functional impairment due to cognitive decline in PD. It also proved to be particularly effective in the advanced stages of PD, and would be a useful support for the diagnosis of PD-MCI and PDD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Safinamide is a recent antiparkinsonian drug that modulates both dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems with positive effects on motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of safinamide in the Italian PD patients in real-life conditions. Methods: We performed a sub-analysis of the Italian cohort of the SYNAPSES study, a multi-country, multi-center, retrospective-prospective cohort observational study, designed to investigate the use of safinamide in routine clinical practice. Patients received for the first time a treatment with safinamide and were followed up for 12 months. The analysis was conducted on the overall population and in subgroups of interest: i) patients > 75 years, ii) patients with relevant comorbidities and iii) patients affected by psychiatric symptoms. Results: Italy enrolled 616/1610 patients in 52 centers, accounting for 38% of the entire SYNAPSES cohort. Of the patients enrolled, 86.0% were evaluable at 12 months, with 23.3% being > 75 years, 42.4% with psychiatric conditions and 67.7% with relevant comorbidities. Safinamide was effective on motor symptoms and fluctuations as measured through the Unified PD rating scale III and IV scores, and on the total score, without safety issues in none of the subgroups considered. Conclusion: The SYNAPSES data related to Italian patients confirms the good safety profile of safinamide even in special groups of patients. Motor fluctuations and motor impairment improved at the follow-up suggesting the significant role of safinamide in managing motor symptoms in PD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: There is growing evidence that Parkinson's disease and diabetes are partially related diseases; however, the association between the two, and the impact of specific treatments, are still unclear. We evaluated the effect of T2D and antidiabetic treatment on age at PD onset and on all-cause mortality. Research design and methods: The standardized rate of T2D was calculated for PD patients using the direct method and compared with subjects with essential tremor (ET) and the general Italian population. Age at onset and survival were also compared between patients without T2D (PD-noT2D), patients who developed T2D before PD onset (PD-preT2D) and patients who developed T2D after PD onset (PD-postT2D). Results: We designed a retrospective and prospective study. The T2D standardized ratio of PD (N = 8380) and ET (N = 1032) patients was 3.8% and 6.1%, respectively, while in the Italian general population, the overall prevalence was 5.3%. In PD-preT2D patients, on antidiabetic treatment, the onset of PD was associated with a + 6.2 year delay (p < 0.001) while no difference was observed in PD-postT2D. Occurrence of T2D before PD onset negatively affected prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.64 [95% CI 1.33–2.02]; p < 0.001), while no effect on survival was found in PD-postT2D subjects (hazard ratio = 0.86, [95% CI 0.53–1.39]; p = 0.54). Conclusions: T2D, treated with any antidiabetic therapy before PD, is associated with a delay in its onset. Duration of diabetes increases mortality in PD-preT2D, but not in PD-postT2D. These findings prompt further studies on antidiabetic drugs as a potential disease-modifying therapy for PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On the basis of Covid-19-induced pulmonary pathological and vascular changes, we hypothesize that the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug bevacizumab might be beneficial for treating Covid-19 patients. From Feb 15 to April 5, 2020, we conducted a single-arm trial (NCT04275414) and recruited 26 patients from 2-centers (China and Italy) with severe Covid-19, with respiratory rate ≥30 times/min, oxygen saturation ≤93% with ambient air, or partial arterial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspiration O2 ratio (PaO2/FiO2) >100 mmHg and ≤300 mmHg, and diffuse pneumonia confirmed by chest imaging. Followed up for 28 days. Among these, bevacizumab plus standard care markedly improves the PaO2/FiO2 ratios at days 1 and 7. By day 28, 24 (92%) patients show improvement in oxygen-support status, 17 (65%) patients are discharged, and none show worsen oxygen-support status nor die. Significant reduction of lesion areas/ratios are shown in chest computed tomography (CT) or X-ray within 7 days. Of 14 patients with fever, body temperature normalizes within 72 h in 13 (93%) patients. Relative to comparable controls, bevacizumab shows clinical efficacy by improving oxygenation and shortening oxygen-support duration. Our findings suggest bevacizumab plus standard care is highly beneficial for patients with severe Covid-19. Randomized controlled trial is warranted. In this single-arm clinical trial, the authors show that treatment of COVID-19 patients with bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug, can improve PaO2/FiO2 ratios and oxygen-support status. Relative to an external control group, bevacizumab shows clinical efficacy by improving oxygenation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Caring for a person with Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with an increased risk of psychiatric morbidity and persistent distress. The objective of this study was to describe the burden and the related factors of caregivers of advanced PD (APD) patients either treated with continuous dopaminergic delivery systems or standard therapy.Methods: This cross-sectional, epidemiologic study conducted in 13 Italian sites enrolled PD patients treated with continuous dopaminergic delivering systems [either levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion or continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI)] or continuation of standard of care (SOC) with a caregiver. Patient quality of life (QoL) and caregiver burden were assessed using the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) and Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI), respectively.Results: 126 patients (mean age 69.3 ± 8 years) and their caregivers (mean age 57.9 ± 12.9) were enrolled. Most caregivers were spouses. Fifty-three patients were treated with LCIG, 19 with CSAI, and 54 with SOC. Mean ZBI scores were 29.6 ± 14.4 for LCIG, 35.8 ± 20.2 for CSAI, and 31.4 ± 16.0 for SOC. Caregivers of LCIG, CSAI, and SOC patients showed no burden or mild/moderate burden in 74, 53, and 63% of the cases, respectively. Mean PDQ-8 scores were 11.25 ± 5.67, 11.26 ± 5.55, and 14.22 ± 6.51 in LCIG, CSAI, and SOC patients. Neurologists considered patients “very much or much improved” in 89, 58, and 13% of the LCIG, CSAI, and SOC groups using the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement Scale. Predictors significantly associated with caregiver burden were patients and caregivers’ judgment of QoL and caregivers’ need to change work.Conclusions: Caregiver burden showed a tendency to be lower when patients are treated with LCIG than with CSAI or SOC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, such as selegiline and rasagiline, can be used as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease (PD). Data on long-term efficacy of MAO-B inhibitors are limited with no head-to-head comparison available to date. The aim of this case-control retrospective study was to analyze data from patients with PD attending the Parkinson Institute (Milan, Italy) over a 6-year period (2009-2015) and compare the effects of selegiline and rasagiline on levodopa treatment outcomes. Patients with PD treated with either selegiline ( n = 85) or rasagiline ( n = 85) for 3 years as well as a control group of patients ( N = 170) who have never received MAO-B inhibitors, were matched for gender, disease duration (±1 year) and age (±1 year) at baseline assessment (ratio 1:1:2). The Unified PD Rating Scale and the Hoehn-Yahr staging system were used for clinical comparisons. At baseline, mean PD duration was 6.5 years and clinical features were comparable across all three groups. After a mean follow-up of approximately 37 months, no differences in clinical progression of motor and non-motor symptoms were observed between the three groups. However, MAO-B inhibitor use was associated with ~2-fold lower change in daily dose of levodopa ( p < 0.001) and lower dyskinesia scores ( p = 0.028) than non-users. No intra-class differences were observed between selegiline and rasagiline. Long-term use of MAO-B inhibitors resulted in a significant reduction in levodopa requirements and a lower frequency of dyskinesias in patients with PD. Selegiline and rasagiline had equal efficacy in controlling motor symptoms in PD patients on optimized therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) has been available in English since 2008. As part of this process, the MDS-UPDRS organizing team developed guidelines for development of official non-English translations. We present here the formal process for completing officially approved non-English versions of the MDS-UPDRS and specifically focus on the first of these versions in Italian. The MDS-UPDRS was translated into Italian and tested in 377 native-Italian speaking PD patients. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses determined whether the factor structure for the English-language MDS-UPDRS could be confirmed in data collected using the Italian translation. To be designated an 'Official MDS translation,' the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) had to be ≥0.90 relative to the English-language version. For all four parts of the Italian MDS-UPDRS, the CFI, in comparison with the English-language data, was ≥0.94. Exploratory factor analyses revealed some differences between the two datasets, however these differences were considered to be within an acceptable range. The Italian version of the MDS-UPDRS reaches the criterion to be designated as an Official Translation and is now available for use. This protocol will serve as outline for further validation of this in multiple languages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The cognitive status of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who developed pathological gambling (PG) during dopamine replacement therapy has been poorly explored. We compared clinical and cognitive features of 21 consecutive PD patients with active PG (PD–PG) versus 42 PD controls of similar disease duration without any impulse control disorder. All patients underwent full neuropsychological testing to evaluate executive and other frontal lobe-related functions, attention, learning and memory, language, visuospatial abilities and neuropsychiatric status [using Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)] as well as the South Oaks Gambling Screen Scale (SOGS). PD–PG were younger (60.4 vs. 64.9, p = 0.01) and more frequently of male gender (85 vs. 57%, p = 0.02). The two groups did not differ in medication dosages and kind of dopamine agonist. PD–PG had higher MMSE (29.1 vs. 27.4, p = 0.02) and performed better at Rey Auditory Verbal learning Test (45.9 vs. 40.4, p = 0.04), verbal phonemic fluencies (38.7 vs. 31.8, p = 0.02), verbal semantic fluencies (44.9 vs. 37.4, p = 0.01) and attentive matrices (47.6 vs. 43.5, p = 0.05) while the remaining cognitive performances were comparable to controls. Moreover, based on the NPI, PD–PG had higher aggressiveness, irritability, disinhibition and eating disorders than controls. In conclusion the occurrence of PG in our cohort of patients with PD was associated with preserved executive functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. In the Figure [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We are reporting our clinical experience in 66 patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) who were switched to tolcapone because of persisting off periods despite treatment with entacapone (according to the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal products: EMEA). We used UPDRS II-III-IV in “on” state to monitor tolcapone effectiveness at 6 and 12 months. We found significant reductions in mean off-time duration (UPDRS item 39) and levodopa dose at follow up. Eleven patients dropped out (17%) during the first month of treatment, 2 (3%) because liver enzymes exceeded normal limit. Amongst patients who continued tolcapone, 30/55 (54%) reported “off-time” reduction ≥25% (UPDRS-39 decrement ≥1 point). Our findings indicate that tolcapone widens the levodopa therapeutic window, even in patients who have not benefited from entacapone. We suggest that tolcapone is indicated before patients are referred for more invasive procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction is presented to the article "Efficacy of rasagiline and selegiline in Parkinson's disease: a head-to-head 3-year retrospective case-control study" which appeared in August 22, 2017 issue.