Search

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent condition frequently necessitating knee replacement surgery, with demand projected to rise substantially. Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) offers advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet its utilisation remains low despite guidance recommending consideration alongside TKA in shared decision making. Radiographic decision aids exist but are underutilised due to clinician time constraints. Materials and methods: This research develops a novel radiographic artificial intelligence (AI) tool using a dataset of knee radiographs and a panel of expert orthopaedic surgeons' assessments. Six AI models were trained to identify PKA candidacy. Results: 1241 labelled four-view radiograph series were included. Models achieved statistically significant accuracies above random assignment, with EfficientNet-ES demonstrating the highest performance (AUC 95%, F1 score 83% and accuracy 80%). Conclusions: The AI decision tool shows promise in identifying PKA candidates, potentially addressing underutilisation of this procedure. Its integration into clinical practice could enhance shared decision making and improve patient outcomes. Further validation and implementation studies are warranted to assess real-world utility and impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised implant designs are available for primary total knee arthroplasty. However, whether the implant design is associated with a difference in the level of activity still remains unclear. This clinical trial compared posterior-stabilised and cruciate-retaining implants in sport-related patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, rate of return to sport, and weekly time dedicated to sport in active adults. It was also hypothesised that in young and active patients both implants lead to a similar rate of return to sport in terms of hours per week, type of sport, and joint mobility. Methods: All patients were evaluated preoperatively and for a minimum of 36 months follow-up. The University of California Los Angeles activity scores, High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, and Visual Analogue Scale were administered preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The range of motion was investigated at admission and the last follow-up. Data concerning the hours per week dedicated to sports and the type of sport practiced were also collected at admission and at the last follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier Curve was performed to compare implant survivorship. Results: Data from 227 procedures (cruciate-retaining: 109, posterior-stabilised: 118) were prospectively collected. At the last follow-up, no difference was reported in The University of California Los Angeles activity scores (p = 0.6), High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (p = 0.1), Visual Analogue Scale (p = 0.9), flexion (p = 0.7) and extension (p = 0.4). No difference was found in the rate of return (p = 0.1) and weekly hours dedicated to sport (p = 0.3). The Kaplan–Meier curve evidenced no statistically significant difference in implant survivorship (p = 0.6). Conclusions: At approximately five years of follow-up, no difference was reported between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised implants in active adults in sport-related patient-reported outcomes measures, range of motion, pain, weekly time dedicated to sport, rate of return to sport, and implant survivorship. Level of evidence: Level II, prospective study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Methods Results Conclusions Level of Evidence This work developed a novel preclinical test of total knee replacements (TKRs) in order to explain TKR instability linked to patient dissatisfaction. It was hypothesized that stability tests on the isolated moving prostheses would provide novel comparative data on the stability and kinematics among TKR designs.Three TKR designs, DePuy Synthes Attune MS, Stryker Triathlon and Zimmer Biomet Persona MC, were assessed using a robotic arm while flexing–extending 0–140°. Tests imposed 710 N body weight combined with three tibial loads: no anterior–posterior (AP) force, 90 N anterior or 90 N posterior force. Other load effects were minimized and the kinematics was recorded. Each implant was tested six times to investigate the repeatability of the method. Data were analysed using statistical parametric mapping with one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA). If significance was found (p < 0.05), post hoc t tests with Bonferroni correction were used to contrast groups.Significant differences were found throughout flexion–extension. Femoral rollback, AP stability, coupled internal–external rotation and AP position (roll‐back) were all influenced by implant design. AP stability of the TKRs reduced with flexion reaching Attune 15 mm, Persona 13 mm and Triathlon 21 mm at 140° flexion. Tractive rolling significantly affected kinematics in the less congruent Triathlon design, with 6 mm different paths between flexion and extension motion (p < 0.05 across 5–100°). Paradoxical anterior femoral sliding in early flexion (0–40°) occurred in Persona and Triathlon designs.The novel testing technique provides, for the first time, comparative data on the inherent stability and kinematics of the TKR implants themselves across the arc of flexion–extension, independent of variables including soft tissue behaviour and surgical technique. The data show how much each prosthesis can contribute to the stability and motion of the implanted knee. Similar data from a wider range of designs will enable more informed decisions regarding implant design choice, aiming to reduce the prevalence of TKR instability in patients.Controlled laboratory study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]