1. Global analysis of social learning’s archetypes in natural resource management: understanding pathways of co-creation of knowledge
- Author
-
Bonatti, M., Lana, M., Medina, L., Chevelev, P., Baldivieso, C., Errismann, C., Gleich, P., Rodriguez, Leidy Tatiana, Eufemia, L., da Silva Rosa, T., Borba, J., Matavel, C., Schlindwein, S., Ison, R., Eisenack, K., Hellin, J., Pacillo, G., Vadez, V., Bossuet, J., Dolinska, A., Sieber, S., Bonatti, M., Lana, M., Medina, L., Chevelev, P., Baldivieso, C., Errismann, C., Gleich, P., Rodriguez, Leidy Tatiana, Eufemia, L., da Silva Rosa, T., Borba, J., Matavel, C., Schlindwein, S., Ison, R., Eisenack, K., Hellin, J., Pacillo, G., Vadez, V., Bossuet, J., Dolinska, A., and Sieber, S.
- Abstract
Although social learning (SL) conceptualization and implementation are flourishing in sustainability sciences, and its non-rigid conceptual fluidity is regarded as an advantage, research must advance the understanding of SL phenomenon patterns based on empirical data, thus contributing to the identification of its forms and triggering mechanisms, particularly those that can address urgent Anthropocene socio-ecological problems. This study aims to discover fundamental patterns along which SL in natural resources management differs by identifying SL archetypes and establishing correlations between the SL process and overall geopolitical conditions. Using a systematic literature review comprising 137 case studies in the five continents, content analysis, and correlations were performed. Results show two main archetypes of social learning (endogenous and exogenous). Their occurrence was linked, to where social learning occurs and how venues/preconditions for social learning are placed. In the Global South, endogenous SL should be better potentialized as a catalyzer of deliberative processes for sustainable natural resources management.
- Published
- 2024