Search

Maintenance of postural control is a complex task that requires the integration of different sensory-motor processes. To improve postural control, balance training is often implemented using unstable surfaces. Little is known, however, about how different surfaces compare in terms of postural control strategy. Non-linear dynamical system analysis, like recurrent quantification analysis (RQA) applied to the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory, represents a useful tool in this respect. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different unstable supports on the CoP trajectory through a complementary approach based on linear and non-linear analyses. Seventeen healthy adults performed barefoot single-leg balance trials on a force plate and on three different balance training devices (soft disc, foam pad, and pillow). Sets of parameters were extracted from the CoP trajectories using classical stabilometric analysis (sway path, mean velocity, root mean square) and RQA (percent recurrence and determinism, maximum line length, entropy). Both classical and RQA analyses highlighted significant differences between stable (force plate) and unstable conditions (p < 0.001). Conversely, only classical stabilometric parameters showed significant differences among the considered balance training devices, indicating that the different characteristics of the devices do not influence the dynamic/temporal structure of the CoP trajectory. Analysis of the center of pressure trajectory during single-leg standing on three different balance training devices and on a rigid surface using both linear and non-linear techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The kinematics of the body center of mass (bCoM) may provide crucial information supporting the rehabilitation process of people with transfemoral amputation. The use of magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) is promising as it may allow in-the-field bCoM motion monitoring. Indeed, bCoM acceleration might be obtained by fusing the estimated accelerations of body segments' centers of mass (sCoM), the formers being computed from the measured accelerations by segment-mounted MIMUs and the known relative position between each pair of MIMU and underlying sCoM. This paper investigates how erroneous identifications of MIMUs positions impact the accuracy of estimated 3D sCoM and bCoM accelerations in transfemoral amputee gait. Using an experimental design approach, 215 simulations of erroneous identifications of MIMUs positions (up to 0.02 m in each direction) were simulated over seven recorded gait cycles of one participant. MIMUs located on the trunk and sound lower limbs were shown to explain up to 77% of the variance in the accuracy of the estimated bCoM acceleration, presumably due to the higher mass and/or angular velocity of these segments during gait of lower-limb amputees. Therefore, a special attention should be paid when identifying the positions of MIMUs located on segments contributing the most to the investigated motion. Sensitivity of the estimated vertical body center of mass acceleration to erroneous identifications of MIMU positions in the anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML), and vertical (V) directions, expressed in percentage of the total variance of the estimation accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been proposed as an alternative to force platforms and pressure sensors for gait events (i.e., initial and final contacts) detection. While multiple algorithms have been developed, the impact of gait event timing errors on temporal parameters and asymmetry has never been investigated in people with transfemoral amputation walking freely on level ground. In this study, five algorithms were comparatively assessed on gait data of seven people with transfemoral amputation, equipped with three IMUs mounted at the pelvis and both shanks, using pressure insoles for reference. Algorithms' performance was first quantified in terms of gait event detection rate (sensitivity, positive predictive value). Only two algorithms, based on shank mounted IMUs, achieved an acceptable detection rate (positive predictive value > 99%). For these two, accuracy of gait events timings, temporal parameters, and absolute symmetry index of stance-phase duration (SPD-ASI) were assessed. Whereas both algorithms achieved high accuracy for stride duration estimates (median errors: 0%, interquartile ranges < 1.75%), lower accuracy was found for other temporal parameters due to relatively high errors in the detection of final contact events. Furthermore, SPD-ASI derived from IMU-based algorithms proved to be significantly different to that obtained from insoles data. Graphical abstract Gait event detection with IMU in people with transfemoral amputation: initial contact (IC) and final contact (FC) events at the sound (s) and prosthetic (p) side are identified. Five algorithms were implemented using either shank-mounted or pelvis-mounted IMUs. Gait events were used to estimate temporal parameters (stride duration, stance phase duration [SPD], and double support time) and SPD asymmetry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]