Search

Purpose: The present study was to investigate if five values that are part of the hemogram analysis routinely checked before heart surgeries can be used as a high-quality, quick, low-cost, and easy-to-use outcome predictor. Methods: This investigation was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for combined adverse events. We enrolled 1500 consecutive patients who underwent elective, on-pump, open-heart surgery from 2011 to 2014. Preoperative hemogram evaluation, red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were recorded. We classified combined adverse events (CAE) as (1) myocardial infarction, (2) cardiac reoperation, (3) prolonged mechanical ventilation, (4) prolonged hospital stay, (5) rehospitalization, or (6) mortality. Results: It was found that several parameters obtained as part of the hemogram, namely RDW, MPV, PLR, and NLR, can predict, individually or in combinations, the outcomes in open-heart surgery patients. It was found that the prediction success of NLR (4.8 fold) was higher compared to RDW (1.8 fold) and MPV (1.5 fold). When the prediction success of the combined parameters was investigated, the NLR-RDW (4.7 fold) pair was found higher in the prediction of CAE occurrence. The predictive success of the triple combination of NLR-MPV-RDW (5.5 fold) was higher than other combinations. Conclusions: The triple combination of parameters obtained as part of the hemogram, NLR-RDW-MPV, indicated a much more predictive power than two parameters coupled. This combination of three parameters, NLR-RDW-MPV, is to be considered as a sensitive, high-quality, low-cost outcome prediction marker for cardiac surgery patients that is less time consuming and easy to use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In the present study, changes in hemodynamic parameters and cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) associated with 10 cm H2O PEEP application were investigated, which is assumed beneficial for the respiratory functions and oxygenation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) applied at 30° head-up left side position. Data gathered via two devices, namely INVOS and FORESIGHT, were compared.Methods: After both the ethics committee approval from the hospital and patients' written consents were obtained, patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery (only ASA I-II) were randomly divided into two groups (Clinical trials protocol NCT02071550). Sensors of INVOS and FORESIGHT devices were placed on the right side at the forehead region. In total, 11 evaluation periods were formed, namely pre-induction (1st period), post-induction (2nd period), abdominal insufflation outset (3rd period), post-insufflation at 5-min intervals (4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th period), at the end of insufflation (9th period), at the end of operation (10th period), and at the end of anesthesia (11th period). While one of the groups did not receive PEEP (ZEEP group), the other group received 10 cm H2O along with abdominal insufflation (PEEP group). Demographic data, hemodynamic values, and rSO2 values were recorded for both groups at all 11 periods.Results: A total of 44 patients in two groups, each group containing 22 individuals, were included in the study. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, etCO2 and SO2 values, and demographic data were found to be similar in both groups. Heart rate was observed to be higher in the PEEP group starting with the PEEP administration. INVOS rSO2 values were found similar in both groups. However, FORESIGHT rSO2 values were found to be higher in the PEEP group compared to the ZEEP group. No patient had cerebral desaturation in both groups throughout the study.Discussion: Application of PEEP with 10 cm H2O during abdominal insufflation could increase the rSO2 value and heart rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, all changes observed were within normal limits. FORESIGHT device yielded more compatible results with hemodynamic data compared to INVOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We investigated the distribution of early clinical outcomes among normal, obese, and morbidly obese patients undergoing open heart surgery. Methods: Medical records of 1,000 patients undergoing open heart surgery since February 2011 at our hospital were investigated retrospectively after permission was obtained from the Council of Education Planning of the hospital. The comorbidities and perioperative and discharge data were analyzed for 279 patients with a body mass index (BMI) score between 18 and <30 [non-obese reference group (NRG, n = 279)]; 166 patients with BMI between 30 and <35 [obese group (OG, n = 166); and 192 seriously obese patients with BMI ≥35 [extreme obese group (EOG, n = 192)]. Distribution of the patients according to BMI scores was found to represent the BMI distribution of the Turkish population. Results: Pulmonary and infective complications were significantly higher in EOG patients compared to NRG based on crude confidence interval. Based on adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis, by adjusting the effects of age, sex, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and smoking, the incidence of pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications in EOG was higher compared to NRG. Discharge with morbidity was significantly higher in OG and EOG compared to NRG. Conclusions: We found that obesity does not increase short-term mortality for open heart surgery; however, it increases the risk of postoperative pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications and discharge with morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]