Search

Purpose: To elucidate the effects of various tibial and femoral attachment locations on the theoretical length changes and isometry of PCL grafts in healthy knees during in vivo weightbearing motion.Methods: The intact knees of 14 patients were imaged using a combined magnetic resonance and dual fluoroscopic imaging technique while the patient performed a quasi-static lunge (0°-120° of flexion). The theoretical end-to-end distances of the 3-dimensional wrapping paths between 165 femoral attachments, including the anatomic anterolateral bundle (ALB), central attachment and posteromedial bundle (PMB) of the PCL, connected to an anterolateral, central, and posteromedial tibial attachment were simulated and measured. A descriptive heatmap was created to demonstrate the length changes on the medial condyle and formal comparisons were made between the length changes of the anatomic PCL and most isometric grafts.Results: The most isometric graft, with approximately 3% length change between 0° and 120° of flexion, was located proximal to the anatomic femoral PCL attachments. Grafts with femoral attachments proximal to the isometric zone decreased in length with increasing flexion angles, whereas grafts with more distal attachments increased in length with increasing flexion angles. The ALB and central single-bundle graft demonstrated a significant elongation from 0° to 120° of flexion (p < 0.001). The PMB decreased in length between 0° and 60° of flexion after which the bundle increased in length to its maximum length at 120° (p < 0.001). No significant differences in length changes were found between either the ALB or PMB and the central graft, and between the ALB and PMB at flexion angles ≥ 60° (n.s.).Conclusions: The most isometric attachment was proximal to the anatomic PCL footprint and resulted in non-physiological length changes. Moving the femoral attachment locations of the PCL significantly affected length change patterns, whereas moving the tibia locations did not. The importance of anatomically positioned (i.e., distal to the isometric area) femoral PCL reconstruction locations to replicate physiological length changes is highlighted. These data can be used to optimize tunnel positioning in either single- or double-bundle and primary or revision PCL reconstruction cases.Level Of Evidence: IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: It has been reported that technical error in positioning the graft tunnel is the most common problem in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate femoral and tibial tunnel positions and intra-articular graft orientation of primary ACL reconstruction in patients who had undergone revision ACL reconstruction. We postulated that this patient cohort had a nonanatomically positioned tunnel and graft orientation. Methods: Twenty-six patients who had undergone a revision ACL were investigated. Clinical magnetic resonance (MR) images prior to revision were analysed. Three-dimensional models of bones and tunnels on the femur and tibia were created. Intra-articular graft orientation was measured in axial, sagittal and coronal planes. Graft positions were measured on the tibial plateau as a percentage from anterior to posterior and medial to lateral; graft positions on the femur were measured using the quadrant method. Results: Sagittal elevation angle for failed ACL reconstruction graft (69.6° ± 13.4°) was significantly greater ( p < 0.05) than that of the native anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the ACL (AM 56.2° ± 6.1°, PL 55.5° ± 8.1°). In the transverse plane, the deviation angle of the failed graft (37.3° ± 21.0°) was significantly greater than native ACL bundles. The tibial tunnel in this patient cohort was placed posteromedially and medially to the anatomical AM and PL bundles, respectively. The femoral tunnel was placed anteriorly to the anatomical AM and PL bundles. Conclusions: This study reveals that both the tibial and femoral tunnel positions and consequently the intra-articular graft orientation in this patient group with failed ACL reconstruction were nonanatomical when compared with native ACL values. The results can be used to improve tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe the correlation between medial patellar ossification and prior patella subluxation and/or dislocation.Materials and Methods: A retrospective billing database search identified 544 patients who had been diagnosed with patellar instability over a 13-year period. One hundred twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. After review by a staff orthopedic surgeon and two musculoskeletal radiologists, 28 patients were found to have medial patellar ossification. The size and location of medial patellar ossification was recorded.Results: Of the 28 patients (20 males, eight females, age 13-66 years, mean 28 years) who were found to have medial patellar ossification, 22 had radiographs, 16 had magnetic resonance imaging, and ten had both. The medial patellar ossification ranged in size from 2 to 18 mm with an average of 6.8 mm. Twelve were located in the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), 14 in the medial joint capsule, and two in both the MPFL and joint capsule. Twenty-seven of 28 patients had a single ossification, and one patient had two ossifications. The timing from injury to first imaging of the lesion ranged from 10 days to a chronic history (> or = 35 years) of patellar instability.Conclusion: Medial patellar ossification correlates with a history of prior patella subluxation and/or dislocation. The medial ossification can be seen within the MPFL or the medial joint capsule, suggesting remote injury to these structures. The presence of this lesion will prompt physicians to evaluate for patellar instability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]