Search

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Despite promising success rates, redo ablation is sometimes required. At redo, PVs may be found to be isolated (silent) or reconnected. We studied patients with silent vs reconnected PVs at redo and analysed associations with adverse outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing redo AF ablations between 2013 and 2019 at our institution were included and stratified into silent PVs or reconnected PVs. The primary outcome was a composite of further redo ablation, non-AF ablation, atrioventricular nodal ablation, and death. Secondary outcomes included arrhythmia recurrence. Results: A total of 467 patients were included with mean 4.6 ± 1.7 years follow-up, of whom 48 (10.3%) had silent PVs. The silent PV group had had more often undergone >1 prior ablation (45.8% vs 9.8%; p<0.001), had more persistent AF (62.5% vs 41.1%; p=0.005) and had more non-PV ablation performed both at prior ablation procedures and at the analysed redo ablation. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in those with silent PVs (25% vs 13.8%; p=0.053). Arrhythmia recurrence was also more common in the silent PV group (66.7% vs 50.6%; p=0.047). After multivariable adjustment, female sex (aHR 2.35 [95% CI 2.35–3.96]; p=0.001) and ischaemic heart disease (aHR 3.21 [95% CI 1.56–6.62]; p=0.002) were independently associated with the primary outcome, and left atrial enlargement (aHR 1.58 [95% CI 1.20–2.08]; p=0.001) and >1 prior ablation (aHR 1.88 [95% CI 1.30–2.72]; p<0.001) were independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence. Whilst a finding of silent PVs was not itself significant after multivariable adjustment, this provides an easily assessable parameter at clinically indicated redo ablation which informs the clinician of the likelihood of a worse future prognosis. Conclusions: Patients with silent PVs at redo AF ablation have worse clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ultrasound (US) is being increasingly used to guide vascular access for electrophysiology (EP) procedures in many centres. Nonetheless, the incidence and predictors of vascular complications in the US era are limited. In this study, we describe our experience of vascular access-related complications associated with EP procedures which were performed with the routine use of US-guided vascular access. Methods: A total of 10,158 consecutive EP procedures in 8361 patients performed from April 2014 (when our centre moved to a policy of routine US-guided vascular access for EP procedures) to March 2022 were included. The outcome of interest was any vascular access-related complication that occurred within 7 days of the procedure; these were classified as severe if surgical intervention and/or blood transfusion was required, major if non-surgical intervention or delayed hospital discharge was required, or minor if it did not fulfil the criteria for severe or major. Results: During the study period, 2 (0.02%) severe vascular complications occurred, including 1 pseudo-aneurysm requiring surgery and 1 retroperitoneal haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. Nine (0.09%) major complications occurred, including 6 hematomas managed by compression devices, 1 type B aortic dissection, 1 AV fistula managed conservatively and 1 haematoma managed conservatively but delayed hospital discharge. Eighteen (0.18%) minor haematomas were seen that did not require any intervention or delayed hospital discharge. On multivariable analysis, female sex [OR (95% CI): 2.5 (1.2, 5.4)] and use of an arterial access [OR (95% CI): 19.3 (7.1, 52.3)] were seen to be independent predictors of the 29 vascular complications. Conclusion: With the use of US-guided vascular access in EP procedures, major vascular complications are exceedingly rare, particularly those needing surgical intervention. Our results provide additional evidence for scientific guidelines to support US use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant and post-partum women, although progress has been made, with specialist joint obstetric-cardiology clinics providing an integrated, safe and personalised service to these women. As a result, fewer non-specialist cardiologists are managing women in pregnancy with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this review is to provide a brief overview of current knowledge and practice in the field, with an emphasis on the major physiological changes which occur during pregnancy, focussing on progress through the trimesters, clinical assessment in pregnancy, management of delivery (concentrating on managed vaginal delivery), drug treatment, key conditions and risk assessment. The latter factor is particularly important in terms of being able to identify high-risk women earlier and to counsel them appropriately. Pregnant women with cardiovascular conditions can, with appropriate knowledge and counselling, be managed safely in specialist multidisciplinary services, but there is a need for cardiologists to understand the key changes and risks involved in pregnancy, delivery and the post-partum period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]