Search

Purpose: Dupilumab is a novel treatment for severe atopic dermatitis and is associated with a range of ocular complications such as blepharoconjunctivitis, keratitis, cicatricial ectropion and punctal stenosis. Methods: We report 4 patients with canalicular obstruction in association with dupilumab therapy, and we describe their treatment and outcomes in each case. Results: Canalicular obstruction was diagnosed by an oculoplastic consultant between 3 years and 3 months and 4 years and 9 months after the commencement of dupilumab therapy. Case 1 underwent nasolacrimal intubation, case 2 was treated conservatively, and case 4 underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and these patients' symptoms resolved. Unfortunately, in case 3 despite endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with stenting they remained symptomatic. Conclusion: This case series adds to the growing number of ocular complications associated with dupilumab therapy, and there is yet an optimal treatment strategy to mitigate these complications. It is possible that simple conservative measures such as discontinuation of dupilumab and topical treatments with steroids can eventually lead to some form of recovery and recanalisation of the canalicular system. Early referral to an ophthalmologist prior to the development of canalicular obstruction to control the inflammatory ocular surface could reduce the risks of cicatricial sequelae from dupilumab, and temporary stenting of the canalicular system could be attempted as a method to keep the canalicular system patent, whilst the patient remained on treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Biologics in Atopic Dermatitis: Experiences & Learnings (BADEL) project aims to improve real-life understanding of how, where, and when biologics can play a role in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. Methods: Individual experiences of 24 patients with moderate-to-severe AD and who had been treated with biologic therapy (dupilumab) for ≥ 3–6 months, and 20 HCPs with a sub-specialty interest in AD were collected by means of focus groups held in Canada, Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom. Dupilumab was the only biologic therapy available at the time of the study. Results: Most patients had suffered from AD for many years, particularly from itch and psychosocial issues, with AD negatively impacting all aspects of their life. They had experienced a long treatment journey and seen many dermatologists, enduring treatment delays and failures. They had been prescribed various therapies without long-term success. Biologics provided symptom improvement, offering many patients a near-normal quality of life. Side effects, especially conjunctivitis, were the greatest drawback, and there were a few issues with incomplete or unreliable efficacy. HCPs agreed that biologic therapy for AD in the majority of patients demonstrated rapid onset, good efficacy and tolerability, and are a viable option in patients who had exhausted all other treatment options. However, those patients who failed to sufficiently respond or developed intolerable adverse effects, particularly ocular symptoms, require alternative therapeutic options. Conclusion: Biologics can provide a near-normal quality of life for many patients with AD. Patients with AD who have failed conventional therapies should be offered all such novel therapies. Education and good patient–HCP communication will enable patients to manage their disease and treatment expectations. Patients and HCPs alike eagerly await alternative targeted therapies, which will offer greater choice and flexibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]