1. Solving the explainable AI conundrum by bridging clinicians' needs and developers' goals.
- Author
-
Bienefeld, Nadine, Boss, Jens Michael, Lüthy, Rahel, Brodbeck, Dominique, Azzati, Jan, Blaser, Mirco, Willms, Jan, and Keller, Emanuela
- Subjects
COMPUTER simulation ,PROBLEM solving ,CLINICAL decision support systems ,RESEARCH methodology ,ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,PSYCHOLOGY ,HUMAN services programs ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,SURVEYS ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,CONCEPTUAL models ,RESEARCH funding ,NEEDS assessment ,DATA analysis software ,GOAL (Psychology) ,LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a promising solution for addressing the implementation challenges of AI/ML in healthcare. However, little is known about how developers and clinicians interpret XAI and what conflicting goals and requirements they may have. This paper presents the findings of a longitudinal multi-method study involving 112 developers and clinicians co-designing an XAI solution for a clinical decision support system. Our study identifies three key differences between developer and clinician mental models of XAI, including opposing goals (model interpretability vs. clinical plausibility), different sources of truth (data vs. patient), and the role of exploring new vs. exploiting old knowledge. Based on our findings, we propose design solutions that can help address the XAI conundrum in healthcare, including the use of causal inference models, personalized explanations, and ambidexterity between exploration and exploitation mindsets. Our study highlights the importance of considering the perspectives of both developers and clinicians in the design of XAI systems and provides practical recommendations for improving the effectiveness and usability of XAI in healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF