Search

Introduction: Keratinocyte tumors (KT) are frequently observed. Surgery is the treatment gold standard. In some cases, a surgical approach might not be the best option. Radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments can frequently cause side effects or be contraindicated. Intralesional methotrexate (MTX) can be a conservative yet effective alternative. We decided to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intralesional chemotherapy with MTX for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), keratoacanthoma (KA), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Methods: All patients had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of BCC, SCC, or KA and no indication to surgery or RT. MTX was injected subcutaneously proceeding from the periphery of the lesion toward the center. Different protocols in terms of dose, frequency, and length of treatment were used to compare them. Treatment efficacy was evaluated in terms of tumor size reduction. Patients were divided into three groups: responders (improvement of more than 50%), partial responders (< 50%), and non-responders (no improvement or worsening). All data were analyzed using the chi-squared test (χ2). Results: Thirty-five patients were included. Twenty-one patients suffered from SCC, 12 from KA, and 2 from BCC. KA showed a higher response rate than SCC and BCC. For AK, 92% of patients had a complete resolution; 8% were partial responders. For SCC, 47.6% of cases were responders and 14.3% partial responders, while 38% non-responders. All BCCs showed no improvement. A treatment protocol of weekly injections, performed for 4 to 6 weeks, was the most efficient. Doses of 25 mg/ml per session seemed to be most effective. About one third of our patients developed side effects with mild anemia being the most frequent. Conclusions: For selected cases, intralesional MTX can be a safe and effective option for the treatment of KT, especially in case of KA and, to a lesser extent, SCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis (CNH) is a benign auricular disease whose differentiation with nonpigmented tumors is mandatory. Clinical characteristics of CNH are well known, but there is no information about the dermoscopic features that could help differentiate CNH from squamous cell carcinoma and other non-melanoma skin cancers. To describe the dermoscopic appearance of CNH and to formulate a differential diagnostic model, we conducted  a retrospective, single center, observational dermoscopic study on a sample of 189 biopsy-proven lesions: 25 CNH; 26 squamous cell carcinomas; 62 basal cell carcinomas and 76 other benign and malignant tumors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted by logistic regression. The most significant dermoscopic finding for CNH was a peculiar global configuration (daisy pattern), consisting of white thick lines, radially arranged, converging to a central rounded yellow/brown clod (an erosion covered by keratin or sero-crust). This pattern achieved 92 and 98% of specificity for discriminating CNH with squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma, respectively. In conclusion, dermoscopy is valuable for the diagnosis of CNH as a first screening tool because of a consistent global dermoscopic configuration (daisy pattern), consisting of radially arranged white thick lines surrounding a central rounded yellow/brown clod. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]