Search

Purpose: In cholesteatoma recidivism, achieving satisfactory hearing outcome after revision surgery remains challenging. The presence of concomitant recidivism pathology or related anatomical abnormalities can impact revision reconstruction of the sound transmission system. The current study aimed to identify prognostic factors affecting hearing outcomes after surgery for cholesteatoma recidivism. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients whose ears required initial surgery for recidivism between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients followed up for < 6 months and those not indicated for ossiculoplasty were excluded. The impact of preoperative otoscopic findings, computed tomography (CT) features, and hearing levels on the prediction of satisfactory hearing (postoperative air–bone gap [ABG] ≤ 20 dB) was evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: Overall, 102 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 24.8 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following independent predictive factors for satisfactory hearing: presence of aeration in the tympanic cavity (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 13.287 [1.113–158.604], p = 0.0409), absence of soft-tissue density occupying the oval window (OR [95% CI]: 13.445 [3.178–56.887], p = 0.0040), and ≤ 22.5 dB preoperative ABG in four-frequency average (OR [95% CI]: 9.339 [2.026–43.050], p = 0.0042). Conclusions: For cholesteatoma recidivism, reliable preoperative prediction based on CT and ABG would facilitate decision-making regarding the probability of efficient revision ossiculoplasty or appropriate preoperative counseling, including early hearing rehabilitation using hearing aids or implementation of simultaneous implantable hearing equipment during surgery for recidivism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Appropriate reconstruction of the canal wall or maintenance of the middle ear pressure in cholesteatoma may help in preventing recurrence. Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction (RMR) can overcome the challenge of a wider canal wall defect or temporal bone immaturity, which possibly increases the recurrence risk. This study compared the outcomes of RMR and intact canal wall tympanomastoidectomy (ICW) for cholesteatomas with minimal mastoid extension and quantitatively evaluate the relationship between anatomical features and recurrence. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone primary ICW or RMR for pars flaccida cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension from 2009 to 2019. The main outcome measures were anatomical measurements of the shortest distance between the cranial fossa and the upper canal wall (SCU), attic volume, and bony defect area of the canal wall (BDC) on computed tomography; recidivism; and postoperative air–bone gap (ABG). Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative anatomical factors, recidivism incidence, and postoperative ABG between the RMR (n = 20) and ICW (n = 60) groups. However, the median BDC was significantly greater in the RMR group (58.3 vs. 37.0 mm2). There was no significant difference in the SCU and attic volume between patients with and without recurrence. Conclusion: Selection of RMR or ICW may not affect recidivism and hearing outcomes in cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension. Bony defect size and attic narrowness were not associated with recurrence. Considering wider visualization and one-staged operation, RMR can be more adaptable than ICW for cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]