Search

Objective: To describe the economic impact of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to assess its medical and non-medical costs.Design and Settings: An observational study was carried out in 105 patients in two French centres in a sample of 105 French patients. All consecutive patients, consulting during a 3-week period, were included provided they were 60 years of age or older and they presented an exudative form of AMD with a distant visual acuity in the best eye < or = 20/40. Data collected included clinical items, treatment modalities, medical follow-up, transport costs, impact of AMD on living conditions and welfare payments related to visual impairment. Costs were presented in 2000 values.Perspective: General payer perspective (Social Security, private health insurance and patient).Results: Mean age was 79.3 years and ranged from 62.8-95 years. Average length of disease evolution was 3.5 years. During a 3-month period, patients had a mean of 2.6 visits to the ophthalmologist. Thirty percent of the patients used vascular medications and 72.4% had been previously treated by laser photocoagulation. Only 10% had benefited from visual rehabilitation. Annual AMD cost per patient was 3660.29 euros (EUR) [95% CI: 2881.92-4438.62]. Half of these annual costs were medical costs. Other major cost components were home help costs EUR904.91 [95% CI: 478.88-1330.94] and transport costs for care EUR542.73 [95% CI: 146.31-939.14]. Non-medical costs were significantly higher for patients with more severe disease.Conclusions: The economic argument that costs are higher in patients with the lowest visual acuity emphasises the necessity of early detection and treatment of patients with AMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of traditional French summer vacation on visual acuity and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of Wet AMD patients being treated with intravitreal Ranibizumab.Methods: This was a consecutive, comparative, single-centre, prospective analysis. All patients who were being treated with intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab at Cergy Pontoise Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology between July 2013 and September 2014 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: (A) patients who skipped one ranibizumab intravitreal injection during holidays, and (B) patients who received injection during their holidays. Evaluations occurred prior to traditional holiday (baseline) and 2 months later, consisting of BCVA using ETDRS, and a complete ophthalmic examination that included slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus examination, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). All patients were being treated with PRN anti-VEGF regimen and criteria for reinjection included a visual acuity loss >5 ETDRS letters and/or an increase of central retinal thickness, presence of subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, or pigment epithelium detachment. If reinjection criteria were not met, patients were advised to return in 4 weeks.Results: The mean visual acuity change was -0.071 ± 0.149 (LogMAR) in group A and + 0.003 ± 0.178 in group B (P = 0.041). At the second visit (2 months after preholidays visit), 61.8% of patients in group A had SRF and/or intraretinal cysts, and only 27.6% of patients in group B. There was a significant difference in the persistence of fluid between the two groups (P = 0.007, χ(2)-test).Conclusion: This cases series demonstrated the detrimental impact of holidays on visual acuity in patients treated with ranibizumab for AMD, which, in spite of their treatment regimen, still leave in vacation. Therefore, it is important to convey the message of treatment adherence to patients, despite their need of holidays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]