Search

Background: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma face a poor prognosis. Standard first-line treatment involves platinum-based combinations followed by avelumab maintenance therapy. Follow-up therapies include enfortumab vedotin, vinflunine, and taxanes., Objective: To analyze new drug combinations in first-line and follow-up treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma concerning their clinical relevance, toxicities, and novel treatment sequences., Materials and Methods: Analysis of new study data from EV-302/KN-A39 (enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab) and CheckMate-901 (nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin) for untreated metastatic patients as well as TROPHY-U-01 (sacituzumab govitecan) and THOR (erdafitinib) for later lines., Results: The new standard in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma is the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab. For cisplatin-eligible patients with contraindications to enfortumab vedotin, the combination of nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin offers an alternative. Erdafitinib presents a new biomarker-based option in the follow-up treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma., Conclusion: These novel combinations are revolutionizing the treatment standard for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and necessitate a new approach to managing side effects., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men, mostly affecting older men who harbor an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the standard therapy for various stages of prostate cancer, further increases the risk for cardiovascular disease and for metabolic syndrome. Therefore, screening for cardiovascular risk factors should be performed prior to the initiation of ADT, and, if necessary, cardiological evaluation and interdisciplinary management should be provided during and after completion of ADT. Moreover, the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist may help reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with cardiovascular disease., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: An increasing understanding of the cellular processes involved in growth, metastasis and development of resistance enable the development of new treatment strategies for advanced prostate cancer., Objectives: Using selected examples, the aim of this report is to present current developments to the reader and to give an outlook on possible upcoming changes in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: Narrative report based on expert consensus, supported by a literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE) and the abstract databases of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Examples were selected to illustrate current developments without claiming completeness., Results: The androgen receptor (AR) signal transduction pathway remains a focus of scientific interest. Androgen synthesis inhibitors and AR degraders are promising new approaches to overcome resistance mediated by AR mutations or splice variants. Inhibition of key switch sites of alternative signaling pathways such as AKT or CDK4/6 provide additional treatment options, including combinational strategies through a tight linkage with the AR signaling pathway. A better understanding of tumor microenvironment and immune response is required for novel immunotherapeutic strategies using bispecific T‑cell engagers (BiTEs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells., Conclusion: New treatment strategies give hope that we will be able to intervene even more effectively in the course of disease of advanced prostate cancer in the future. However, a major challenge, especially for the implementation of targeted treatment approaches, is likely to be the heterogeneity of tumor progression not only inter- but also intrapersonally., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Guidelines can only give treatment recommendations for defined patient groups if high quality and meaningful evidence is available. However, patients included in clinical trials for the treatment of metastatic and/or locally advanced bladder cancer (mUC) are generally not representative for the spectrum of patients encountered in daily clinical practice. In particular, patients with different systemic pretreatments, variable prestudy responses or variable time to tumor progression are not sufficiently considered in trials and guideline recommendations. Accordingly, recommendations for the treatment of mUC patients with previous perioperative systemic therapy are lacking. To provide some guidance for daily uro-oncological practice despite the limited evidence, we sought to develop expert opinion-based treatment recommendations. These recommendations focus on palliative first-line therapy of mUC. Both perioperative pretreatment with classical cisplatin-based systemic therapy and/or immunotherapy, as well as the time to tumor recurrence have been considered., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)