Search

Background: Severe infections play an important role in the emergency department (ED) and early risk stratification is essential. We compared the prognostic value of APACHE II, SOFA, and MEDS scores, and the biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6)., Methods: We performed a prospective observational study. Patients aged 18 years or older with a severe infection, from whom blood cultures were taken, were included., Results: Two hundred and eleven patients were included. The 30-day mortality rate was 8.5%. All scores and biomarkers showed significant area under the curve (AUC) values of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for death within 30 days: 0.801 for APACHE II, 0.785 for MEDS, 0.708 for SOFA, 0.693 for CRP, 0.651 for PCT, and 0.716 for IL-6. For treatment in an ICU and need for mechanical ventilation, these parameters had significant AUC values, too. For renal replacement therapy, only APACHE II, SOFA, and PCT showed significant AUC values. According to the trend observed, the AUC values were highest for the APACHE II score., Conclusions: All investigated parameters have a predictive value in patients with an infection in the ED. According to the trend observed, the APACHE II score seems to have the best discriminative power. Use of the APACHE II score already at the time of admission to the ED may be useful for stratifying patients at risk for ICU treatment, thereby using the same score in the ED and the ICU.

Introduction: Sepsis in the early stage is a common disease in emergency medicine, and rapid diagnosis is essential. Our aim was to compare pathogen diagnosis using blood cultures (BC) and the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.Methods. At total of 211 patients admitted to the multidisciplinary emergency department of our university hospital between 2006 and 2009 with suspected severe infection from any origin were studied. Blood samples for BC (aerobic and anaerobic) and multiplex PCR were taken for identification of infectious microorganisms immediately after hospital admission. Results of the BC and PCR correlated with procalcitonin concentration (PCT) and clinical diagnosis of sepsis (≥2 positive SIRS criteria) as well as with severity of disease at admission and with clinical outcome measures., Results: Results of the BC were available in 200 patients (94.8%) and PCR were available in 119 patients (56.3%), respectively. In total, 87 BC (43.5%) were positive and identified 94 pathogens. In 45 positive PCRs, 47 pathogens (37.8%) were found. Identical results were obtained in 81.4%. In addition, BC identified 9 Gram-positive and 3 Gram-negative bacteria, while PCR added 5 Gram-negative pathogens. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were detected in blood cultures only (n=20, 21.3%), whereas PCR identified significantly more Gram-negative bacteria than BC. In patients with positive PCR results, the PCT level was significantly higher than in patients with negative PCR (15.0±23.3 vs. 8.8±32.8 ng/ml, p<0.001). This difference was not observed for BC (10.6±25.7 vs. 11.6±44.9 ng/ml, p=0.075). The APACHE II score correlated with PCR (19.2±9.1 vs. 15.8±8.9, p<0.05) and was also higher in positive BC (18.7±8.7 vs. 14.4±8.0, p<0.01). Positive PCR and BC were correlated with negative clinical outcomes (e.g., transfer to ICU, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, death)., Conclusion: In patients admitted with suspected severe infection, a high percentage of positive BC and PCR were observed. Positive findings in the PCR correlate with elevated levels of PCT and high APACHE II scores.

For elderly patients specific medical problems, such as the consequences of aging organs, comorbidities or geriatric syndromes must be considered in the intensive care treatment of acute diseases. Under these circumstances special instruments for geriatric assessment are particularly useful. Up to now geriatrics and intensive care medicine have made complementary contributions in the treatment of severely ill elderly patients. A closer interdisciplinary cooperation of the two disciplines could be of substantial beneficial value in the care of the sick and elderly to overcome the many open questions and pressing problems.