Search

Presenting a phenomenological realism of religious experience, this chapter elucidates the function of the epoche in the phenomenology of religion. Some interpretations of the epoche preclude any commitments to realism. For instance, Husserl’s epoche is typically understood as a methodological device for “bracketing” any assertions about the real world. Drawing on the works of Emmanuel Levinas and the Dutch phenomenologist of religion Gerardus van der Leeuw, I outline a different interpretation of the epoche, one that affirms the reality of religious experience in terms of hospitable restraint that makes contact with the irreducible hiddenness or alterity of others. The epoche thus involves a tactful touch that leaves the other intact. Following Heidegger’s existential turn in phenomenology, van der Leeuw and Levinas seek to live the epoche so that it is not a mere methodological device but a prereflective and religious mode of being fundamental to all human endeavor. The dynamic of touching that makes contact while leaving the other intact also resonates with the speculative realism of thinkers like Jean-Luc Nancy and Graham Harman. In a phenomenological realism, the epoche can assist efforts to clarify the historical and material conditions that make up religious experience while also affirming the real existence of religious experience through hospitality to irreducible alterity.