Search

Conventional measures of radiologist efficiency, such as the relative value unit, fail to account for variations in the complexity and difficulty of a given study. For lumbar spine MRI (LMRI), an ideal performance metric should account for the global severity of lumbar degenerative disease (LSDD) which may influence reporting time (RT), thereby affecting clinical productivity. This study aims to derive a global LSDD metric and estimate its effect on RT. A 10-year archive of LMRI reports comprising 13,388 exams was reviewed. Objective reporting timestamps were used to calculate RT. A natural language processing (NLP) tool was used to extract radiologist-assigned stenosis severity using a 6-point scale (0 = “normal” to 5 = “severe”) at each lumbar level. The composite severity score (CSS) was calculated as the sum of each of 18 stenosis grades. The predictive values of CSS, sex, age, radiologist identity, and referring service on RT were examined with multiple regression models. The NLP tool accurately classified LSDD in 94.8% of cases in a validation set. The CSS increased with patient age and differed between men and women. In a univariable model, CSS was a significant predictor of mean RT (R2 = 0.38, p p R2 = 0.83, p 25, R2 = 0.15, p = 0.05). Individual radiologist study volume was negatively correlated with mean RT (Pearson’s R = − 0.35, p

MRI is considered the gold standard in soft tissue diagnostic of the lumbar spine. Number of protocols and modalities are used – from one hand 2D sagittal, 2D angulated axial, 2D consecutive axial and 3D image types; from the other hand different sequences and contrasts are used: T1w, T2w; fat suppression, water suppression etc. Images of different modalities are not always aligned. Resolutions and field of view also vary. SNR is also different for different MRI equipment. So the goal should be to create an algorithm that covers great variety of imaging techniques.

We describe a method to automatically detect and label the vertebrae in human lumbar spine MRI scans. Our contribution is to show that marrying two strong algorithms (the DPM object detector of Felzenszwalb et al. [1], and inference using dynamic programming on chains) together with appropriate modelling, results in a simple, computationally cheap procedure, that achieves state-of-the-art performance. The training of the algorithm is principled, and heuristics are not required. The method is evaluated quantitatively on a dataset of 371 MRI scans, and it is shown that the method copes with pathologies such as scoliosis, joined vertebrae, deformed vertebrae and disks, and imaging artifacts. We also demonstrate that the same method is applicable (without retraining) to CT scans.