Search

Introduction: Numerous publications have studied the regional anatomy of the carpal tunnel to define a "safe zone" to reduce the risk of perioperative neurovascular complications. This zone, located between the ulnar neurovascular bundle and the median nerve, is considered to be safe mainly because of the absence of vascular structures. This study aims to assess the presence of arterioles within this area using superb microvascular imaging (SMI)., Materials and Methods: The images from patients who underwent a bilateral routine wrist ultrasound with SMI, between January 28 and February 28, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists to evaluate the presence and location of arterioles in the safe zone. In addition, cadaveric wrists injected with intra-arterial red latex underwent dissection of the carpal tunnel., Results: The images from 27 patients (54 wrists) were reviewed. In the safe zone, arterioles were seen superficial to the retinaculum in 36 wrists (36/54; 66.7%) and deep to the retinaculum in 21 wrists (21/54; 38.9%). The arterioles located deep to the retinaculum were more frequently found close to the median nerve (21/54; 38.9%) than to the ulnar artery (9/54; 16.7%). In five cadaveric wrists, arterioles were detected superficial to the retinaculum in 3 wrists (3/5; 60%) and deep to the retinaculum in 2 wrists (2/5; 40%)., Conclusion: Arterioles can be seen in the safe zone both superficial and deep to the flexor retinaculum. Deep to the retinaculum, they are mainly observed in the proximal aspect of the carpal tunnel and more frequently close to the median nerve., Key Points: • Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) enables the visualization of arterioles within the "safe zone" of the carpal tunnel (visible both superficial and deep to the flexor retinaculum). • Arterioles were more frequently observed in the proximal aspect of the carpal tunnel. • Deep to the retinaculum, arterioles were more frequently seen in proximity to the median nerve.

It is not known whether there are any consistent non-serological differences between seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, and if any, whether they depend upon rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), or both. In a pilot study, we showed that the two forms could be differentiated using power-Doppler sonography (PDS), and that the difference is ACPA dependent. This extended study explored whether the previous findings could be confirmed. 103 patients 51 ACPA positive (ACPA +), 52 ACPA negative (ACPA -) with active wrist arthritis were examined using PDS. By means of a temporal image series, pulsatility was evaluated over a 3-5-s period, maximum and minimum perfusion signal were determined using a computer program counting the number of coloured pixels for each frame. Maxima (P max ) and minima (P min ) were determined, and the standardized peak-to-peak amplitude sA was calculated (sA = (P max  - P min )/P max ). This parameter was then compared for ACPA + and ACPA- patients. In addition, a multivariate regression was performed, to determine which factors influence sA. sA differed significantly between ACPA + and ACPA- patients [20% (13-26) vs. 41% (32-57), p < 0. 0001]. In the multivariate analysis, age (t = 2.5, p = 0.02) and ACPA status (t = - 4.8, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of sA. PDS perfusion patterns are different in seropositive and seronegative RA. The difference appears to be ACPA, not RF dependent. This suggests that the underlying pathophysiological process is different in ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA.

The utility of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) for evaluating hand joint lesions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission is unreported. This study aimed to compare SMI and power Doppler imaging (PDI) for the evaluation of hand joint lesions in these patients. Twenty-six patients with RA in clinical remission were enrolled. A total of 572 joints (52 wrist, 260 proximal interphalangeal, and 260 metacarpophalangeal joints) were detected by SMI and PDI. A semi-quantitative scale of 0-3 was used to compare the detection of synovial blood flow signal by SMI and PDI. Inter-observer agreement for the assessment of SMI and PDI scores was measured with kappa values. In the ten healthy volunteers, SMI and PDI signals were both scored 0. In the 26 RA patients, the remission rate via PDI was 65.4% but was only 42.3% via SMI. SMI also detected microvessel flow signal in seven patients diagnosed with clinical remission via PDI. Moreover, a total of 106 blood flow signals (18.5%) were detected by SMI, while 50 blood flow signals (8.7%) were detected by PDI. Compared with PDI, SMI increased 18.0% of power flow signals from Grade 0-1 and increased 13.7% of power flow signals from Grade 1-2. One joint classified as Grade 1 by PDI was classified as Grade 0 by SMI. Inter-observer agreement for PDI and SMI semi-quantitative scoring was moderate (kappa = 0.463). SMI seems more sensitive than PDI for detecting hand joint lesions in RA in clinical remission PDI, and could aid the achievement of true remission in RA patients.

In 90% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the joints of the hand are affected. Studies of grip strength training have not indicated a negative effect on disease activity after training. Introduction of ultrasound Doppler (USD) to measure increased blood flow induced by inflammation has made it possible to investigate the direct effect on blood supply in the synovium after training. In this case-control study, 24 patients with RA with USD activity in the wrist joint participated. The USD activity was measured by the color fraction (CF) (CF = colored pixels/total number of pixels in ROI). Twenty-four patients were assigned to an 8-week grip strength training program. At baseline and after 8 weeks of training, an USD examination of the wrist joint was performed. In the training group, we measured grip strength and pain in the wrist joint. Six patients withdrew from the training because of pain or change in medication. Eighteen patients served as control group. There was a modest, not significant, decrease in the CF in response to training (1.86%; P = 0.08). Grip strength increased 8.8% after training (P = 0.055). Pain in motion deceased after training (P = 0.04). No difference in the CF was seen between the training and control groups, neither at baseline nor at follow-up (P = 0.82 and P = 0.48). Patients withdrawing from training had a significantly higher CF than the other patients (P > 0.001). The results in this study might indicate that the flow in the synovium assessed by USD is not affected by grip strength training.

Intravenous regional administration of corticosteroid (IVRAS) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the hand has not been reported previously. The method is based on a modification of Bier's block, with substitution of corticosteroid for local anaesthetic. Twenty-two patients were assessed in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The technique was safe and effective in improving grip strength, with a group mean improvement of more than 50%. Because suppression of endogenous cortisol production 24 h after treatment was commensurate with the dose of methylprednisolone used (40 mg), we could not exclude that the response may have been due to systemic steroid. Further studies are required to define the real value of IVRAS as it may offer alternative treatment of the joints and tendons within the hand and wrist in some patients rather than more prolonged oral therapy or individual, multiple joint or sheath injections.