1. Comparative clinical and predictive value of lung perfusion blood volume CT, lung perfusion SPECT and catheter pulmonary angiography images in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension before and after balloon pulmonary angioplasty.
- Author
-
Koike H, Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Uetani M, Nakata T, and Maemura K
- Subjects
- Aged, Angiography methods, Blood Volume, Chronic Disease, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary physiopathology, Hypertension, Pulmonary therapy, Lung diagnostic imaging, Lung physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, Perfusion, Predictive Value of Tests, Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism physiopathology, Pulmonary Embolism therapy, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods, Angioplasty, Balloon methods, Hypertension, Pulmonary diagnostic imaging, Pulmonary Embolism diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Objectives: Lung perfusion blood volume (PBV) using dual-energy computed tomography has recently become an accepted technique for diagnosing pulmonary thromboembolism. We evaluated the correlation among lung PBV, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and catheter pulmonary angiography images in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) before and after balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA)., Methods: In total, 17 patients and 57 sessions were evaluated with the three modalities. Segmental lung perfusion and its improvement in lung PBV and SPECT were compared with catheter pulmonary angiography as the reference standard before and after BPA., Results: The sensitivity for detecting segmental perfusion defects using SPECT and lung PBV was 85% and 92%, the specificity was 99% and 99%, the accuracy was 92% and 95%, the positive predictive value was 99% and 99%, and the negative predictive value was 88% and 93%. The sensitivity for detecting segmental perfusion improvement using SPECT and lung PBV was 61% and 69%, the specificity was 75% and 83%, the accuracy was 62% and 70%, the positive predictive value was 97% and 98%, and the negative predictive value was 12% and 16%., Conclusions: Lung PBV is a useful technique for evaluation of segmental lung perfusion and its improvement in patients with CTEPH., Key Points: • BPA is a new treatment for patients with CTEPH. • Lung PBV images may be more sensitive for pulmonary blood flow. • The current work demonstrates that Lung PBV images are useful in evaluating patients with CTEPH. • The current work demonstrates that Lung PBV is useful in gauging the treatment effect of BPA.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF