Search

Purpose: Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a minimally-invasive technique used to treat renal tumors. A clinical pathway and prospective research protocol (AMBU-REIN) were specifically set up to establish and assess the routine use of day-case RPN., Methods: The AMBU-REIN study was conducted in the framework of the French research network on kidney cancer UroCCR (NCT03293563). We present our initial experience of patients treated using day-case RPN and released from our hospital on the same day, focusing on patient selection, safety and patient satisfaction using the EVAN-G validated questionnaire., Results: Between September 2016 and September 2019, 429 RPN were performed and 82 patients were consecutively selected for day-case RPN. Patients were managed using transperitoneal RPN with off-clamp tumorectomy for 66/82 cases. Mean tumor size was 2.7 ± 1.2 cm. There were no immediate severe postoperative complications; 7/82 patients were kept under observation overnight and discharged the following day. The follow-up at day 30 indicated postoperative complications, readmissions, and mortality rates of 1.2, 1.2, and 0%, respectively. Next-day patient satisfaction questionnaires indicated that patients were generally highly satisfied, with a mean ± standard deviation global score of 83.6 ± 10.3%. "Attention" was rated the highest overall (mean 94.8 ± 10.5%), while "pain management" scored the lowest (61.2 ± 20.5%)., Conclusions: This prospective case series is the first to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of day-case RPN. For selected patients and through a dedicated, nurse-led clinical pathway, it provided a high level of patient satisfaction. Expected benefits on healthcare cost savings warrant further investigation., (© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To evaluate renal function and to identify factors associated with renal dysfunction in the elective indications setting of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed operative data and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 519 patients treated by NSS in an elective indications setting between 1984 and 2006 in eight academic institutions. A GFR decrease under the thresholds of 60 or 45 ml/min at last follow-up was considered a significant renal dysfunction. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to assess multiple factors of renal function., Results: Median age, tumor size, preoperative, and final GFR were 59.5 years (27-84), 2.7 cm (0.9-11), 79 (45-137), and 69 ml/min (p < 0.0001), respectively, with a median follow-up of 23 months (1-416). Hilar clamping was performed in 375 procedures (72.3 %). Significant GFR decrease was observed in 89 patients (17.1 %). Median operating time, hilar clamping duration, and blood loss were 137 min (55-350), 22 min (0-90), and 150 ml (0-4150), respectively. At univariate analysis, age (p = 0.002), preoperative GFR (p = 0.001), pedicular clamping (p = 0.01), and ischemia time (p = 0.0001) were associated with renal dysfunction. Age (p = 0.004; HR 1.2), pedicular clamping (p = 0.04; HR 1.3), and ischemia time (p = 0.0001; HR 1.8) remained independent risk factors for renal function deterioration in multivariate analysis., Conclusion: Non- or time-limited clamping techniques are associated with preservation of renal function in the elective indications setting of NSS.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of selective arterial embolization (SAE) of angiomyolipomas based on the percentage volume reduction after embolization and to identify predictive factors of volume decrease., Methods: Patients receiving prophylactic SAE of renal angiomyolipomas were included retrospectively over 3 years. The volume change after SAE and haemorrhagic or surgical events were recorded. Initial tumour volume, percentage tumour fat content, mean tumour density, embolic agent used, number of angiomyolipomas and tuberous sclerosis disease were evaluated as predictive factors of volume decrease., Results: A total of 19 patients with 39 angiomyolipomas were included with median follow-up of 28 months (interquartile range 21-37 months). All treatments were technically successful (92% primary and 8% secondary). No distal bleeding or any increase in size or surgical nephrectomy after SAE was recorded. Mean volume reduction was 72% (±24%). Volumes before SAE (R(2) = 0.276; p = 0.001), percentage fat content (R(2) = 0.612; p < 0.0001) and mean angiomyolipoma density (R(2) = 0.536; p < 0.0001) were identified as predictive factors of volume decrease. In multivariate regression, only percentage fat content influenced volume decreases., Conclusions: SAE is an efficient treatment for angiomyolipoma devascularisation and volume reduction. A significant reduction of volume is modulated by the initial volume and tissue composition of the tumour., Key Points: • Selective arterial embolization is effective for angiomyolipoma devascularisation and volume reduction • Volume reduction depends of initial volume and tissue composition of the tumour • Selective arterial embolization is a low radiation treatment.

Purpose: With the emergence of targeted therapies, the indications of cytoreductive nephrectomy have to be redefined. This review article presents the evidence data guiding our current indications of surgery in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of targeted therapies., Methods: A nonsystematic review of the electronic databases PubMed and MEDLINE from 1980 to 2012 was performed and limited to English language., Results: Two studies based on immunotherapy (EORTC 30947 and SWOG 8949) were at the origins of the recommendations on initial nephrectomy for patients with mRCC. Since the introduction of angiogenesis inhibitors, there is still no high-level evidence from prospective studies assessing the indication of surgery for mRCC. However, surgery still has its importance in the management of primary tumors and metastasis with the objective of an optimal balance between morbidity, quality of life, and survival. The treatment sequence between surgery and targeted therapies is still to be established and two randomized prospective studies were then specifically designed and are currently recruiting., Conclusions: Preliminary evidence data from retrospective series seem to be in favor of a benefit of surgery for patients with good and intermediate prognosis. However, patients' inclusions in current prospective studies are highly recommended to clearly precise nephrectomy's indications.

Objectives: To evaluate survival and outcomes after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of malignant renal tumours in high-risk patients with long-term follow-up., Methods: Between 2002 and 2009, 62 patients (71 tumours), with a median age of 73.5 years (20-87), consecutively treated with RFA under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance for malignant renal tumours were retrospectively selected and prospectively followed until 2012, including 25 patients (40.3 %) with solitary kidney and 7 cystic cancers. Maximal tumour diameters were between 8 and 46 mm (median: 23 mm)., Results: Radiofrequency ablation was technically possible for all patients. Mean follow-up was 38.8 months (range: 18-78 months). Primary and secondary technique effectiveness was 95.2 % and 98.4 % per patient respectively. The rates of local tumour progression and metastatic evolution were 3.2 % and 9.7 % per patient and were associated with tumour size >4 cm (P = 0.005). The disease-free survival rates were 88.3 % and 61.9 % at 3 and 5 years. No significant difference in glomerular filtration rates before and after the procedure was observed (P = 0.107). The major complications rate was 5.9 % per session with an increased risk in the case of central locations (P = 0.006)., Conclusions: Percutaneous renal RFA appears to be safe and effective with useful nephron-sparing results., Key Points: • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-tolerated technique according to mid-term results. • RFA for malignant renal tumours preserved renal function in high-risk patients. • Mid-term efficacy of RFA was close to that of formal conservative surgery. • Tumour size and central location limit the efficacy and safety of RFA.