Search

Objectives: To assess the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) frequencies of centrifugal enhancement, spoke-wheel sign and central scar in focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) as a function of lesion size., Methods: Ninety-four FNHs were retrospectively reviewed to assess their largest diameter and enhancement pattern, including centrifugal enhancement from one central artery, spoke-wheel sign, diffuse or centripetal enhancement, central scar and late-phase washout., Results: Mean FNH-lesion size was 3.7 ± 2.1 cm. Only 43.6 % of FNHs had centrifugal enhancement, with a spoke-wheel pattern (23.4 %) or without (20.2 %), while 56.4 % showed diffuse or centripetal enhancement. Centrifugal enhancement was observed in 73.9 % of FNHs ≤3.1 cm and 14.6 % of FNHs >3.1 cm (P < 10(-4)). Size and frequency of centrifugal enhancement were negatively correlated (r = -0.57, P < 10(-4)). The spoke-wheel pattern was also seen more frequently in smaller (37 %) than in larger FNHs (10.4 %) (P < 10(-3)). Late-phase washout was described in 5.3 % of FNHs and was not size-dependent. Lesions with a central scar were larger than those without, respectively, 5.7 ± 1.7 and 3.6 ± 2.0 cm (P = 0.012)., Conclusions: Typical centrifugal enhancement yielding a confident FNH diagnosis is seen significantly more frequently when the lesion is ≤3.1 cm., Key Points: • CEUS yields confident diagnoses of FNHs ≤3.1 cm • The larger the FNH, the lower the diagnostic sensitivity of CEUS • Final diagnosis of FNHs >3.1 cm should be obtained with MRI not CEUS.

Objectives: To describe the early patterns of liver lesions successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoablation (CA) and their changes over time., Methods: Twenty-two RFA-treated and 17 CA-treated patients underwent CEUS from week 1 to year 3 post-ablation. Patterns, margins and volumes of RF-induced and cryolesions were evaluated and compared over time., Results: After contrast enhancement, shortly after ablation, undefined margins with persistent enhancing small vessels penetrating >2 mm into the treated zone were significantly more frequent after CA (67 %) than RFA (22 %) (P < 0.02). During the arterial phase, a thin, enhancing marginal rim was seen during week 1 (T1) in around 28 % of RF lesions, while 75 % of cryolesions had thick enhancing rims (P < 0.02). The mean RF-induced lesion volume, maximum at T1 (44.1 ± 37.5 ml), shrank slowly over time, remaining clearly visible at 1 year (8.3 ± 7.4 ml). Cryolesions shrank faster (P = 0.009), from an average of 16.6 ± 7.1 ml at T1 to 1.7 ± 1.3 ml 1-year post-ablation., Conclusion: RF-induced and cryolesions differ, particularly their margins and shrinkage rates. Knowing these differences allows avoidance of incomplete treatment or falsely diagnosed recurrence, especially after CA., Key Points: • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) provides new follow-up information following hepatic radiological inyervention. • CEUS provides good visualisation of vascular modifications after thermoablation. • RFA-induced lesions and cryoablated lesions differ. • Knowledge about RF and cryolesion patterns is essential for correct CEUS follow-up. • Cryolesions have thicker peripheral inflammatory reactions and shrink faster than RFA-induced lesions.