Search

Background: Axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is evolving but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care for patients with residual nodal disease. The results of the Alliance A011202 trial evaluating the oncologic safety of ALND omission in this cohort are pending but we hypothesize that ALND omission is already increasing., Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with cT1-3N1M0 breast cancer who underwent NAC and had residual nodal disease (ypN1mi-2) from 2012 to 2021. Temporal trends in omission of completion ALND were assessed annually. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify factors associated with ALND omission and overall survival (OS), respectively., Results: A total of 6101 patients were included; the majority presented with cT2 disease (57%), with 69% HER2+, 23% triple-negative, and 8% hormone receptor-positive/HER2-. Overall, 34% underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone. Rates of ALND were the lowest in the last 4 years of observation. After adjustment, treatment at community centers (vs. academic) and lower pathologic nodal burden were associated with omission of ALND. ALND omission was associated with a higher unadjusted OS (5-year OS: 86% SLNB alone vs. 84% ALND; log-rank p = 0.03), however this association was not maintained after adjustment., Conclusions: Despite the impending release of the Alliance A011202 results, omission of ALND in patients with residual nodal disease after NAC is increasing. This practice appears more prominent in community centers and in patients with a lower burden of residual nodal disease. No association with OS was noted., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Older breast cancer patients represent a heterogeneous population. Studies demonstrate that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission may be appropriate in some clinical scenarios, yet patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are often excluded from these studies. This study evaluated differences in treatment and survival for older patients with TNBC based on SLNB receipt and result., Methods: Patients 70 years old or older with a diagnosis of cT1-2/cN0/M0 TNBC (2010-2019) who underwent surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database. Logistic regression estimated the association of SLNB with therapy, and Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association of SLNB with overall survival (OS) after adjustment for select factors., Results: Of the 15,167 patients included in the study (median age, 77 years), 13.02% did not undergo SLNB, 5.14% had pN1 disease, 0.12% had pN2 disease, and 0.01% had pN3 disease. Most of the patients (83.9%) underwent surgery first, and 16.1% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of those who underwent surgery first and SLNB, 6.2% had pN+ disease. Receipt of SLNB was associated with a higher likelihood of chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-2.21), regardless of pN status. Compared with those who did not undergo a SLNB, a negative SLNB was significantly associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.63-0.75), although there was no difference for a positive SLNB (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.98-1.34). The patients receiving chemotherapy first showed no difference in survival based on SLNB receipt or result (p = 0.23)., Conclusions: Most older patients with TNBC do not have nodal involvement and do not receive chemotherapy. The receipt and results of SLNB may be associated with outcomes for some who undergo surgery first, but not for those who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) is the surgical removal of both breasts to reduce the risk of cancer. In this Society of Surgical Oncology position statement, we review the literature addressing the indications, outcomes, and risks of BRRM to update the society's 2017 statement. We held a virtual meeting to outline key topics and conducted a literature search using PubMed to identify relevant articles. After literature review, recommendations were made according to group consensus. Individuals with a high lifetime risk of breast cancer due to pathogenic variants in high penetrance breast cancer-predisposition genes, early chest or breast radiation exposure, or a compelling family history should be counseled on the option of BRRM. However, BRRM is not recommended for most patients with high-risk lesions and may be contraindicated in patients who have other competing cancers and/or a high risk of surgical complications. BRRM effectively reduces the risk of breast cancer development, although the survival benefit is unclear. For patients with low-to-moderate breast cancer risk, alternative management strategies should be encouraged, including lifestyle modifications, high-risk screening, and risk-reducing medications. Discussions of BRRM should cover: (1) breast-cancer risk estimates; (2) the procedure's degree of risk reduction and impact on survival; (3) surgical techniques, potential surgical complications and long-term sequelae; and (4) alternatives to surgery. Surgeons should encourage shared and informed decision making with patients who have an elevated lifetime risk of developing breast cancer., Competing Interests: Disclosure Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc. that is outside the scope of this work. Chantal Reyna has received an honoraria from Elucent Medical that is outside the scope of this work and the relationship has been terminated. Anna Weiss reports the following disclosures: advisory board/consulting fees from Merck and Myriad Laboratories, Inc.; honoraria from the Society of Breast Imaging, MJH Lifesciences, and Breast Cancer Foundation New Zealand; food and beverage from Endomag. Judy C. Boughey receives funding, paid to her institution, from Eli Lilly and SymBioSis, and sits on the Data Safety Monitoring Committee of Cairns Surgical. She has received honoraria from PER, PeerView, OncLive, EndoMag, and Up-To-Date. Andrea V. Barrio has received a speaking honorarium from Novartis. Jennifer K. Plichta serves on a committee for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. She has received grant funding from Earlier.org that is outside the scope of this work, and has received honoraria from the National Consortium of Breast Centers. Marie Catherine Lee is a paid consultant for Elucent Medical and Provepharm. Puneet Singh, Doreen M. Agnese, Miral Amin, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Erin E. Burke, David N. Danforth Jr, Frederick M. Dirbas, Firas Eladoumikdachi, Olga Kantor, Shicha Kumar, Cindy Matsen, Toan T. Nguyen, Tolga Ozmen, Ko Un Park, Shayna L. Showalter, Toncred Styblo, Nicholas Tranakas, Ashley Woodfin, and Christine Laronga have no conflicts of interest to declare that may be relevant to the contents of this work., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have worse survival compared with stage III non-IBC matched cohorts; however, the prognostic significance of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) in the setting of IBC is not well described. We evaluated overall survival (OS) between IBC patients and non-IBC patients who achieved pCR., Methods: Adult females diagnosed in 2010-2018 with clinical prognostic stage III unilateral invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database. Unadjusted OS from surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare groups. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of study groups with OS after adjustment for available covariates., Results: The study included 38,390 patients; n = 4600 (12.0%) IBC and n = 33,790 (88.0%) non-IBC. Overall pCR rates were lower for IBC compared with non-IBC (20.7% vs. 23.3%; p < 0.001). Among those achieving pCR, 5-year mortality was higher for IBC patients (16.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.9-19.1%) versus non-IBC patients (9.1%, 95% CI 8.4-9.8%; log-rank p < 0.001). Among all patients achieving pCR, IBC remained associated with worse OS compared with non-IBC (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.19-1.85; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: We found a lower pCR rate and worse OS in IBC patients compared with non-IBC stage III patients. Despite effective systemic therapies, achieving a pCR for IBC patients may not carry the same prognostic impact compared with non-IBC stage III patients., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: The utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in older patients remains controversial. Advancements in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy have revolutionized disease response rates and prognosis, supporting efforts to re-evaluate the utility of SLNB. We aimed to assess the differences in treatment and overall survival (OS) in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer based on SLNB., Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (2010-2020), patients ≥ 70 years of age diagnosed with cT1-2/cN0/M0, HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Logistic regression assessed associations with SLNB, systemic therapy, and radiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with OS. Analyses were stratified by treatment sequence, i.e. upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgery., Results: Of the 17,609 patients included, 94% underwent upfront surgery (n = 16,492) and the remaining underwent NAT (n = 1117). Those who underwent SLNB were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, irrespective of nodal status {upfront surgery/systemic therapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-3.67); upfront surgery/radiation (OR 3.97, 95% CI 3.03-5.21); NAT/radiation (OR 5.69, 95% CI 1.83-17.69)}. The breast pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was highest among the hormone receptor (HR)-negative/HER2-positive subtype (50.0%), of which none were found to be ypN+. Comorbidity burden was associated with significantly lower rates of adjuvant systemic therapy and worse OS., Conclusions: Patients who underwent SLNB, regardless of pN status, were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. Nodal positivity is exceedingly rare for patients with a breast pCR following NAT, especially among the HR-negative/HER2-positive subtype. It is reasonable to consider omission of SLNB in select subgroups of older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Multiple studies have demonstrated a link between obesity and breast cancer; however, the potential association between obesity and atypical high-risk breast lesions has not been well characterized. We sought to evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with breast atypia based on a woman's body mass index (BMI)., Methods: We retrospectively identified adult women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), and/or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at a single institution from 2008 to 2017. BMI groups were defined as a BMI 18.5 to < 30 or BMI ≥ 30 (obese). Adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the association of BMI group with the odds of (1) upstage to cancer after atypia on needle biopsy, and (2) subsequent diagnosis of breast cancer., Results: Breast atypia was identified in 503 patients (most advanced atypia: 74.8% ADH, 4.6% ALH, 20.7% LCIS), and 41% of these patients were classified as obese. After adjustment, BMI group was not associated with upstage to breast cancer at surgical excision following needle biopsy (p = 0.16) or development of a subsequent breast cancer (p = 0.08). For those upstaged to breast cancer at the time of surgical excision, or those who developed a subsequent malignancy, tumor subtype, grade and stage were not associated with BMI group (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: In a large cohort of patients diagnosed with atypical breast histology, the risk of upstaging and/or subsequent progression to a breast malignancy was not associated with BMI. Factors other than obesity may influence breast cancer risk., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)