Search

Background: Patients with symptomatic umbilical, trocar, and/or epigastric hernias and concomitant rectus abdominis diastasis represent a growing clinical problem. The optimal management of this complex hernia situation is the subject of debate in the literature. This paper reports the early results of an innovative surgical technique aimed at managing this hernia situation., Methods: Endoscopic-assisted linea alba reconstruction (ELAR) with mesh augmentation is a surgical technique long known in the literature for its good outcome for incisional hernia repair (myofascial release, overlapping herniorrhaphy, Gibson's operation, shoelace repair, anterior rectus sheath repair, dynamic patch plasty) via a small access route. The early results for 140 patients are presented here., Results: Two patients (1.4%) developed postoperative complications requiring redo surgery. These were two cases of diffuse secondary bleeding without an identifiable bleeding source, in one patient with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension and in another patient receiving treatment with platelet aggregation inhibitors. All other complications were successively managed with conservative treatment. After 1 year, two of 30 patients reported occasional pain, including pain at rest in one patient., Conclusion: The ELAR technique with mesh augmentation is an innovative, minimally invasive surgical procedure for treatment of patients with a complex abdominal wall hernia comprising symptomatic umbilical, trocar, and/or epigastric hernias with concomitant rectus abdominis diastasis.

Background: In hernia surgery, mesh fixation with fibrin glue instead of tacks and sutures can demonstrably reduce postoperative morbidity without increasing recurrence rates. In some cases there are significant differences in the biomechanical properties, depending on the functional structure of the meshes. Furthermore, there are various fibrin glue products on the market and these are used for mesh fixation. This study compared the fixation strength of fibrin glues in combination with various meshes., Methods: Three different lightweight polypropylene meshes (TiMESH™ light, ULTRAPRO™, Optilene(®) LP) were tested. All meshes were fixed using 2 ml of each of the three different fibrin glues (TISSUCOL(®), QUIXIL(®), EVICEL(®)) and tested for their biomechanical stability. The defect in the muscle tissue used was 45 mm for a mesh size of 10 × 15 cm. Measurements were conducted using a standardized stamp penetration test, while aiming not to use a fixation strength of less than 32 N., Results: With TISSUCOL, the fixation of Optilene LP proved to be significantly better than that of TiMESH or ULTRAPRO (97.3 vs. 47.9 vs. 34.9 N, p < 0.001). With EVICEL, it was possible to also achieve good tissue fixation for the ULTRAPRO mesh, while the results obtained for Optilene and TiMESH were relatively poorer [114.7 vs. 92.4 N (p = 0.056), vs. 64.3 N (p < 0.001)]. With QUIXIL, satisfactory results were obtained only for Optilene LP (43.6 N)., Conclusion: This study showed that there were significant differences in the fixation strength of different polypropylene meshes in combination with various fibrin glues. Experiments demonstrated that for each mesh there is an optimum combination with a particular fibrin glue with respect to the fixation strength. It must now be verified whether these results can be extrapolated to clinical practice.

Introduction: In recent years, laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias has become increasingly established in routine clinical practice thanks to the myriad advantages it confers. Apart from the risk of intestinal damage following adhesiolysis, to date no information is available on the best way of preventing the formation of new adhesions in the vicinity of the implanted meshes. Numerous experimental investigations, mainly conducted on an open small-animal model, have demonstrated the advantages of coating meshes, inter alia with absorbable materials, compared with uncoated polypropylene meshes. In our established laparoscopic porcine model we set about investigating three of these meshes, which are already available on the market., Materials and Methods: In total, 18 domestic pigs underwent laparoscopic surgery and three different composite meshes were tested in each case on six animals (Dynamesh IPOM, Proceed, Parietene Composite). At 4 months, postmortem diagnostic laparoscopy was carried out, followed by full-wall excision of the specimens. Planimetric analysis was conducted to investigate the size of the entire surface area and the extent of adhesions. Histological investigations were performed on five sections for each specimen. These focused on the partial volumes of inflammatory cells, the proliferation marker Ki67, apoptotic index, inflammatory cell marker CD68 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) as a marker of the extracellular matrix., Results: A similar value of 14% was obtained for shrinkage of Dynamesh IPOM and Parietene Composite, while Proceed showed a 25% reduction in its surface area. Markedly lower values of 12.8% were obtained for Parietene Composite in respect of adhesions to the greater omentum, compared with 31.7% for Proceed and 33.2% for Dynamesh IPOM (p = 0.01). Overall, Parietene Composite performed best in the histological and immunhistochemistry tests., Conclusions: On the whole, all composite meshes showed evidence of good biocompatibility. However, none of the coatings was completely able to prevent adhesions. Coating of polypropylene meshes with collagen appears to confer significant advantages compared with other coatings.

Background: Intraperitoneal repair of incisional hernias using a mesh makes particular demands on the material used. In addition to good integration of the mesh on the parietal side, adhesions to the visceral peritoneum must be avoided. Large-pore, light-weight meshes induce fewer adhesions than heavy-weight polypropylene meshes. Although numerous adhesion-barrier substances for use in combination with a polypropylene mesh have been tested already, mostly in open small animal models, unequivocal benefits have been identified to date in only a few of the experiments., Methods: Using the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique, six pigs were implanted with either a lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh light) or TiMesh plus an adhesion-barrier film made of polylactide (SurgiWrap). After 3 months, the animals underwent a postmortem laparoscopy, and specimens were obtained for planimetric and histologic investigations., Results: No adhesions to intestinal structures were found in any of the animals. Adhesions between the greater omentum and the mesh did not differ significantly between the TiMesh (32%) and SurgiWrap (33.5%) groups. The shrinkage of the mesh's surface area was comparable between the two groups (18% vs. 21%). Histology showed pronounced inflammatory reaction and bridging of scar tissue between the filaments with the use of SurgiWrap versus TiMesh light without film. However, immunohistochemical investigations examining the partial volume of the inflammatory cells, the proliferation marker Ki67, and the apoptotic index at the interface of the filaments all failed to show any significant differences., Conclusion: To avoid adhesions, it is essential that the acute and chronic inflammatory reaction to the implanted material be as small as possible. This requirement is met specifically by the lightweight polypropylene mesh TiMesh light. The additional application of a slowly absorbable adhesion-barrier film made of polylactide (SurgiWrap) does not appear to confer any further benefit.