Search

The overflow of studies in the recent literature on COVID-19 often gives provisional or contradictory results and therefore deserves pauses of reflection and reconsideration. In fact, knowledges of pathophysiology of this new disease are still in development and hence originate discussions and interpretations. Regarding the role of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, these mechanisms should be considered as crucial especially in severe cases. It is proposed to consider two distinct phenotypes of thrombotic manifestations: the current "thromboembolic type" also occurring in other kinds of sepsis, and the diffuse micro-thrombotic type, prevailing in the lungs but sometimes extending to other organs. Both types can induce severe disease and are potentially lethal. The micro-thrombotic pattern, more specific for COVID-19, results from a massive activation of coagulation strictly coupled with a hyper-intense inflammatory and immune reaction. This results in widespread occlusive thrombotic micro-angiopathy with destruction of alveoli and obstructive neoangiogenesis. The involvement of fibrinolysis, often neglected, confers a double faceted process of activation/inhibition, finally conducive to a fibrinolytic shutdown that reinforces persistence of micro-thrombi. Considering these peculiar mechanisms, it seems evident that both prophylactic and therapeutic effects of current anti-thrombotic drugs cannot be taken for granted and need therefore new specific and rigorous controlled trials.

The relation between philosophy and biomedicine has been reassessed and rethought in the last few years: on the one hand, philosophy of science has paid increasing attention to actual modes of biomedical research and clinical practice; on the other, classes in philosophy, and more generally, in the humanities, have started entering medical curricula. However, the role of philosophy in medical education is not yet unanimously recognized, with situations differing significantly in various national and international contexts. In line with the tradition in Italy and other countries of reflecting on clinical methodology and with the recent initiatives at the crossroads between medicine and philosophy, this contribution aims to argue for the mutual relevance of medicine and philosophy in educational processes, and to suggest some possible forms of implementation of their interactions.

Three new oral anticoagulant agents were tested versus warfarin in separate, large phase III randomized clinical trials for prevention of any stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is at 110 mg bid non-inferior and at 150 mg bid superior to warfarin; rivaroxaban, a factor X inhibitor, is also non-inferior, and apixaban, also a factor X inhibitor, is superior to warfarin on the same efficacy end point. Statistical analysis of subgroups does not suggest, for any of the tested drugs, major differences in relation to different risk levels and history of previous stroke/TIA. This re-appraisal of data was undertaken in search for possible additional information, by considering the absolute differences in efficacy and safety events versus warfarin and the corresponding efficiency and number needed to treat, also with regard to secondary versus primary prevention. By this approach, it appears that for all drugs, equivalence or advantage versus warfarin on the efficacy end point is largely driven by a reduction in hemorrhagic rather than ischemic strokes. Dabigatran shows a balanced effect on ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, and apixaban is most effective in sparing intracranial bleeding versus warfarin. In secondary prevention, better efficiency is shown by dabigatran 150 and apixaban, versus rivaroxaban, despite the higher proportion of post-stroke/TIA patients (55 %) in the ROCKET AF trial of rivaroxaban seemed to favor better results of this drug in secondary prevention. These and other results of our approach should not be directly translated into clinical practice. They may supply useful suggestions to be subsequently tested in specific trials, although head-to-head comparative studies of the three drugs remain unlikely.

The acute and chronic effects on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis of a new molecular weight dermatan sulphate (Desmin 370) have been investigated in a double blind, placebo-controlled cross over study in 12 healthy volunteers. The compound (100 and 200 mg) was injected IM and the expected heparin cofactor II potentiating effect, reflecting dermatan sulphate activity, peaked after 2 h and was still detectable after 9 h. Surprisingly for this type of compound, a substantial increase in anti-Xa activity also appeared and lasted up to 12 h in the absence of a significant change in aPTT. The bovine-thrombin time was not changed, while human-thrombin times were slightly, albeit non-significantly, prolonged. The activity of t-PA was increased 6h after the higher dose, but the overall pattern of fibrinolytic activities did not suggest any important change after drug treatment in comparison to placebo. No residual or cumulative effect on any of the investigated parameters was detectable 24 h after the injection on the 4th and 8th days during repeated daily administration. Parallel in vitro and in vivo investigations showed that the unexpected anti-Xa effect was not attributable to contamination by traces of low molecular weight heparin. Desmin 370, a low molecular weight dermatan sulphate that potentiates heparin cofactor II and also inhibits Factor Xa, deserves clinical evaluation as an antithrombotic agent.

Defibrotide is a polynucleotide extracted from mammalian lung, which shows antithrombotic and anti-ischaemic activity in animals, probably related to stimulation of fibrinolysis and/or enhancement of prostacyclin production. The effect of a single infusion of defibrotide on fibrinolysis and the levels of certain prostanoids in man has been investigated in a cross-over double-blind placebo-controlled study. Evaluation of changes in fibrinolysis was difficult because of the spontaneous activation observed after placebo. However, the fast-acting plasminogen activator inhibitor was decreased only at end of the defibrotide infusion, suggesting a moderate profibrinolytic effect superimposed on the spontaneous activation. There was a marked and prolonged elevation of the plasma level of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha, the stable metabolite of prostacyclin. In collagen stimulated whole blood, both 6-keto-PGF1 alpha and prostaglandin E2 production were also greatly increased, with no consistent indication of inhibition of thromboxane B2. It is suggested that defibrotide stimulates prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2 production by leucocytes or via platelet/leukocyte interactions. The effects observed here should be useful in guiding subsequent clinical trials.