Search

An elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is the main finding in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and LV filling pressure is estimated with an algorithm in the recent American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guideline. In this study, we sought to determine the efficacy of LA global longitudinal strain to estimate elevated LV filling pressure. Seventy-one consecutive patients (mean age of 63.2  ±  9.75, 70% male) who underwent left ventricular catheterization were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 24 h before catheterization. The LV filling pressure was estimated using echo parameters based on the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm. LA GLS was measured using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in a four-chamber view (GE, Vivid E9 USA). Invasive LV pre-A pressure corresponding to the mean left atrial pressure (LAP) was used as a reference, and > 12 mm Hg was defined as elevated. Invasive LV filling pressure was defined as elevated in 41 (58%) and normal in 30 patients (42%). The LV filling pressure of 9 (13%) of 71 patients was defined as indeterminate based on the 2016 algorithm. Using the ROC method, 25.5% of LA reservoir strain (LASr) had a higher sensitivity (AUC = 0.79, specificity 77%, sensitivity 80%) in estimating LV filling pressure than the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm (AUC = 0.75, specificity 77%, sensitivity 70%). LASr, with higher sensitivity than 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm, may be used as a single parameter to estimate LV filling pressure and hence may add incremental value toHFpEF diagnosis., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Background: Dermal and myocardial injury results in a healing process, characterized by inflammation and fibrosis. We aimed to investigate association between proliferative scarring at the operation site and right ventricular (RV) pacing and sensing parameters, two clinical outcomes associated with impaired dermal and myocardial healing, respectively., Methods: We performed an observational retrospective study among regularly followed pacemaker (PM)/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)-implanted patients at our medical center. Patients, who had a first RV active fixation PM/ICD lead implantation procedure and a minimum follow-up of 1 year, were included in the study. Redo procedures, passive fixation RV leads, epicardial leads, generator replacement procedures, and patients using class I and III anti-arrhythmic drugs were excluded. Patients in the control group, matched by age, sex and implanted device and lead type, were randomly selected from the patient pool. Lead impedance, pacing threshold, and R wave measurements obtained at baseline and at 3rd, 6th, and 12th month were analyzed., Results: Baseline characteristics of study and control groups were similar. While baseline and follow-up lead impedance and R wave measurements along with baseline and 3rd-month pacing thresholds showed no significant difference between two groups, 6th- and 12th-month pacing thresholds revealed statistically significant increase in proliferative scar group compared to control group (0.87 vs 0.72 p = 0.003 and 0.87 vs 0.71 p = 0.003, respectively)., Conclusions: PM/ICD-implanted patients with proliferative scar on pocket wound may show increased RV pacing thresholds compared to patients with normal healing of pocket wound.